IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v5y1999i3p320-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: the implications for labour

Author

Listed:
  • Tony Edwards

    (Industrial Relations Research Unit. University of Warwick, UK.)

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a rapid growth in mergers and acquisitions between companies based in different countries. Estimates suggest that the value of cross-border mergers and acquisitions amounted to $342 billion in 1997, a fourfold increase in six years, For employees and their representatives three distinct effects of this international merger activity can be identified: first, a general ‘acquisition’ effect which is common to all mergers, not just those that are cross-border in nature; second, a ‘multinational’ effect in which mergers increase the extent to which the acquired operations are subject to international competition; and, third, a ‘nationality’ effect which arises from differences by country in the way that firms are governed and financed. The nationality effect is the subject of this paper. It is argued that takeovers by Anglo-Saxon multinationals pose significant challenges to employees and their representatives, primarily because the system of corporate governance in Anglo-Saxon countries pressurises management into a ‘cost-minimisation’ approach to managing labour. This Anglo-Saxon aspect of the nationality effect is likely to be widespread, mainly because most international acquisitions are undertaken by Anglo-Saxon multinationals but also because the purchase of firms in Britain and America is a key mechanism through which European multinationals are undergoing a process of ‘Anglo-Saxonisation’.

Suggested Citation

  • Tony Edwards, 1999. "Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: the implications for labour," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 5(3), pages 320-343, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:5:y:1999:i:3:p:320-343
    DOI: 10.1177/102425899900500305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/102425899900500305
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/102425899900500305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter J. Buckley & Peter Enderwick, 1985. "The Industrial Relations Practices of Foreign-owned Firms in Britain," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-06819-7, December.
    2. Phillip M Rosenzweig & Nitin Nohria, 1994. "Influences on Human Resource Management Practices in Multinational Corporations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 25(2), pages 229-251, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khilji, Shaista E. & Wang, Xiaoyun, 2007. "New evidence in an old debate: Investigating the relationship between HR satisfaction and turnover," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 377-395, June.
    2. Hisako Matsuo, 2012. "Transfer of Japanese Human Resource Management to US Subsidiaries: Resource Dependence Theory and Institutionalism," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(6), pages 34-46, November.
    3. Tony Edwards & Paul Marginson & Anthony Ferner, 2013. "Multinational Companies in Cross-National Context: Integration, Differentiation, and the Interactions between MNCS and Nation States," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 66(3), pages 547-587, May.
    4. Gamble, Jos, 2006. "Introducing Western-style HRM practices to China: Shopfloor perceptions in a British multinational," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 328-343, December.
    5. Yulin Fang & Guo‐Liang Frank Jiang & Shige Makino & Paul W. Beamish, 2010. "Multinational Firm Knowledge, Use of Expatriates, and Foreign Subsidiary Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 27-54, January.
    6. Eduardo Ortas & Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez & Igor Álvarez, 2019. "National institutions, stakeholder engagement, and firms' environmental, social, and governance performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 598-611, May.
    7. Lazarova, Mila & Peretz, Hilla & Fried, Yitzhak, 2017. "Locals know best? Subsidiary HR autonomy and subsidiary performance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 83-96.
    8. Schuler, Randall S., 2000. "The internationalization of human resource management," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 239-260.
    9. Patel, Parth & Bhanugopan, Ramudu & Sinha, Paresha & Prikshat, Verma & Boyle, Brendan, 2024. "Home country and firm-specific advantage influences on HRM replication versus adaptation in EMNEs operating in advanced economies: A qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Peltokorpi, Vesa, 2015. "Foreign subsidiary top manager nationality and language policy: The moderating effects of subsidiary age and size," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 739-748.
    11. Ignacio Cretini & Marcelo Delfini & Alejandra Quadrana, 2021. "Determinantes de la autonomía local en la gestión del trabajo en empresas multinacionales. El caso de las subsidiarias argentinas," Ensayos de Economía 19346, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    12. Fey, Carl & Björkman, Ingmar, 2000. "The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on MNC Subsidiary Performance in Russia," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2000:6, Stockholm School of Economics.
    13. Johannes Meuer & Marlies Kluike & Uschi Backes-Gellner & Kerstin Pull, 2018. "Using expatriates for adapting subsidiaries' employment modes to different market economies: a comparative analysis of US subsidiaries in Germany, the UK and Switzerland," Working Papers 372, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    14. Byung Il Park & Sungjin J. Hong & Shufeng Simon Xiao, 2022. "Institutional pressure and MNC compliance to prevent bribery: empirical examinations in South Korea and China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 623-656, September.
    15. Zheying Wu & Robert Salomon, 2016. "Does imitation reduce the liability of foreignness? Linking distance, isomorphism, and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(12), pages 2441-2462, December.
    16. Rickley, Marketa & Karim, Samina, 2018. "Managing institutional distance: Examining how firm-specific advantages impact foreign subsidiary CEO staffing," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 740-751.
    17. Yeheskel, Orly & Newburry, William & Zeira, Yoram, 2004. "Significant differences in the pre- and post-incorporation stages of equity international joint ventures (IJVs) and international acquisitions (IAs), and their impacts on effectiveness," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 613-636, October.
    18. Luo, Yadong & Tan, J. Justin, 1998. "A comparison of multinational and domestic firms in an emerging market: A strategic choice perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 21-40, July.
    19. Jie Shen, 2007. "Approaches to International Industrial Relations in Chinese Multinational Corporations," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 18(4), pages 410-426.
    20. McWha-Hermann, Ishbel & Jandric, Jakov & Cook-Lundgren, Emily & Carr, Stuart C., 2022. "Toward fairer global reward: Lessons from international non-governmental organizations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:5:y:1999:i:3:p:320-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.