IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v28y2022i1p83-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crisis corporatism 2.0? The role of social dialogue in the pandemic crisis in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Guglielmo Meardi

    (Scuola Normale Superiore, Florence, Italy)

  • Arianna Tassinari

    (Max-Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

The literature on corporatism sees exogenous threats as opportunities for establishing interclass alliances. This article asks if this has been the case with the COVID-19 pandemic, looking at whether social dialogue practices and functions have changed in the three largest EU countries compared with the ‘crisis corporatism’ and ‘austerity corporatism’ that accompanied the Great Financial Crisis of 2008–2009 and the eurozone crisis of 2010–2012. It concludes that continuity prevails in terms of the forms and limitations of concerted solutions, which remain country-specific. However, a crisis focused on health issues has entailed a shift in the agenda from labour costs to production issues, providing trade unions with discursive resources opening up opportunities to move from the concession bargaining of previous decades to more assertive roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Guglielmo Meardi & Arianna Tassinari, 2022. "Crisis corporatism 2.0? The role of social dialogue in the pandemic crisis in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 83-100, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:83-100
    DOI: 10.1177/10242589221089785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10242589221089785
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10242589221089785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coulter, Steve, 2020. "All in it together? The unlikely rebirth of Covid Corporatism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106496, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Bernhard Ebbinghaus & Lukas Lehner, 2022. "Cui bono – business or labour? Job retention policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 47-64, February.
    3. Guglielmo Meardi & Melanie Simms & Duncan Adam, 2021. "Trade unions and precariat in Europe: Representative claims," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(1), pages 41-58, March.
    4. Hyman, Richard., 2010. "Social dialogue and industrial relations during the economic crisis : innovative practices or business as usual?," ILO Working Papers 994545023402676, International Labour Organization.
    5. Cornel Ban & Dorothee Bohle & Marek Naczyk, 2022. "A perfect storm: COVID-19 and the reorganisation of the German meat industry," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 101-118, February.
    6. repec:ilo:ilowps:454502 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Lucio Baccaro, 2014. "Similar structures, different outcomes: corporatism's resilience and transformation (1974–2005)," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 207-233, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seghezzi, Francesco & Serrani, Lavinia & Negri, Stefania & Virgili, Valeria, 2023. "DEFEN-CE: Social Dialogue in Defence of Vulnerable GroupsinPost-COVID-19 LabourMarkets. Report on Italy and Spain," SocArXiv v3zt7, Center for Open Science.
    2. Angelo Salento & Nicola Costalunga, 2023. "Sindacato, partecipazione, economia fondamentale," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 15-33.
    3. Thomas Klikauer, 2023. "Book Review: Re-Union – How Bold Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(1), pages 157-160, February.
    4. Bernhard Ebbinghaus & Lukas Lehner, 2022. "Cui bono – business or labour? Job retention policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 47-64, February.
    5. Emmanuele Pavolini & David Luque Balbona & Ana M. Guillén, 2022. "Reconciliation policies in COVID times: what role for trade unions in Spain and Italy?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 65-82, February.
    6. David Natali, 2022. "COVID-19 and the opportunity to change the neoliberal agenda: evidence from socio-employment policy responses across Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 15-30, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Pochet, 2022. "From one crisis to another: changes in the governance of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 119-133, February.
    2. William K. Roche & Paul Teague, 2015. "Antecedents of concession bargaining in the Great Recession: evidence from Ireland," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5-6), pages 434-445, November.
    3. Magdalena Bernaciak, 2013. "Social dialogue revival or ‘PR corporatism’? Negotiating anti-crisis measures in Poland and Bulgaria1," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(2), pages 239-251, May.
    4. Beck, Donizete & Ferasso, Marcos, 2023. "How can Stakeholder Capitalism contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? A Cross-network Literature Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    5. Thomas Amossé & Philippe Askenazy & Martin Chevalier & Christine Erhel & Héloïse Petit & Antoine Rebérioux, 2016. "Industrial Relations and Firms’ Reactions to the Recession: A Comparative Micro-Econometric Analysis of France and Great Britain [Relations sociales et ajustements à la crise : une analyse micro-st," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-02172455, HAL.
    6. Giorgio Cutuli & Alessio Tomelleri, 2023. "Returns to digital skills use, temporary employment, and trade unions in European labour markets," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(4), pages 393-413, December.
    7. Bernhard Ebbinghaus & Lukas Lehner, 2022. "Cui bono – business or labour? Job retention policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 47-64, February.
    8. Agar Brugiavini & Raluca Elena Buia & Irene Simonetti, 2024. "The evolution of (post) pandemic labour market outcomes of older workers in Europe," Working Papers 2024: 10, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    9. Richard Bärnthaler & Andreas Novy & Lea Arzberger & Astrid Krisch & Hans Volmary, 2024. "The power to transform structures: power complexes and the challenges for realising a wellbeing economy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Tom Hunt & Heather Connolly, 2023. "Covid‐19 and the work of trade unions: Adaptation, transition and renewal," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 150-166, March.
    11. Sergio CANALDA CRIADO, 2022. "Social partner participation in the management of the COVID‐19 crisis: Tripartite social dialogue in Italy, Portugal and Spain," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(1), pages 149-167, March.
    12. Toon Van Overbeke, 2023. "Conflict or cooperation? Exploring the relationship between cooperative institutions and robotisation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 550-573, September.
    13. William K. Roche & Paul Teague, 2014. "Do Recessions Transform Work and Employment? Evidence from Ireland," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(2), pages 261-285, June.
    14. Paolo Borghi & Annalisa Murgia & Mathilde Mondon-Navazo & Petr Mezihorak, 2021. "Mind the gap between discourses and practices: Platform workers’ representation in France and Italy," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(4), pages 425-443, December.
    15. Dongwoo Park, 2023. "Lopsided inclusion: The impact of multi‐employer bargaining and class‐based unionism on non‐regular employment in South Korea," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(1), pages 110-132, March.
    16. Hancké, Bob & Van Overbeke, Toon & Voss, Dustin, 2022. "Crisis and complementarities: a comparative political economy of economic policies after COVID-19," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111059, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Colin Crouch, 2022. "Reflections on the COVID moment and life beyond neoliberalism," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 31-45, February.
    18. Ana, Daniela & Voicu, Ștefan, 2023. "After Arbeitsschutzkontrollgesetz. Strikes and organic intellectuals in the German meat industry," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 93-113.
    19. Thomas AMOSSÉ & Philippe ASKENAZY & Martin CHEVALIER & Christine ERHEL & Héloïse PETIT & Antoine REBÉRIOUX, 2019. "Industrial relations and adjustments to the crisis: A comparative micro‐statistical analysis of France and Great Britain," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(3), pages 463-487, September.
    20. Francesco Bagnardi & Valentina Petrović, 2020. "Post-socialist labour and the dual logic of collective action: workers’ unrest and trade union strategy in Fiat Automobiles Serbia," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(4), pages 415-430, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:83-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.