IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v19y2013i2p267-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precarious work in the retail sector in Estonia, Poland and Slovenia: trade union responses in a time of economic crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Mrozowicki

    (Institute of Sociology, University of Wrocław)

  • Triin Roosalu

    (Institute of International and Social Studies, Tallinn University)

  • Tatiana Bajuk SenÄ ar

    (Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute of Slovenian Ethnology)

Abstract

This article explores the different trade union responses to the growth of precarious work in the retail sector in Estonia, Poland and Slovenia in the context of the global economic crisis. The empirical research is based on interviews with trade union leaders and case studies of large multinational hypermarket chains. The analysis of sector-level union responses suggests the crisis has not deeply changed their path-dependent character. The most effective union tactics, involving political mobilization and sector-level collective bargaining aimed at halting the growth of precarious work, were observed in Slovenia’s neocorporatist system of industrial relations. By contrast, company-level collective bargaining and mobilization were more advanced in the two neoliberal systems, Estonia and Poland. In all three countries, the most important innovations were union-led campaigns aimed at increasing public awareness about precarious work.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Mrozowicki & Triin Roosalu & Tatiana Bajuk SenÄ ar, 2013. "Precarious work in the retail sector in Estonia, Poland and Slovenia: trade union responses in a time of economic crisis," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(2), pages 267-278, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:19:y:2013:i:2:p:267-278
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258913480601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258913480601
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258913480601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vera Glassner & Maarten Keune & Paul Marginson, 2011. "Collective bargaining in a time of crisis: developments in the private sector in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(3), pages 303-322, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aurora Trif & Imre G Szabó, 2023. "Where to find power resources under a hostile government? The prospects for trade union revitalization after the loss of institutional resources in Hungary and Romania," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(1), pages 25-42, March.
    2. Johanna K Schenner & Paola Cavanna & Natalia Ollus, 2019. "Asylum-seekers and the ‘hyper-precarity trap’ in Austria, Finland and Italy," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 25(1), pages 81-99, February.
    3. Vera Glassner, 2013. "Central and eastern European industrial relations in the crisis: national divergence and path-dependent change," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(2), pages 155-169, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jørgen Svalund & Heidi Kervinen, 2013. "Trade union power during labour adjustments – comparison of company-level cases," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(4), pages 489-505, November.
    2. Paul Marginson & Christian Welz, 2015. "European wage-setting mechanisms under pressure: negotiated and unilateral change and the EU’s economic governance regime," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(4), pages 429-450, November.
    3. Maarten Keune, 2015. "The effects of the EU’s assault on collective bargaining: less governance capacity and more inequality," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(4), pages 477-483, November.
    4. Martí López‐Andreu, 2019. "Employment Institutions under Liberalization Pressures: Analysing the Effects of Regulatory Change on Collective Bargaining in Spain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 57(2), pages 328-349, June.
    5. Paul Marginson & Maarten Keune & Dorothee Bohle, 2014. "Negotiating the effects of uncertainty? The governance capacity of collective bargaining under pressure," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(1), pages 37-51, February.
    6. Vera Glassner, 2013. "Central and eastern European industrial relations in the crisis: national divergence and path-dependent change," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(2), pages 155-169, May.
    7. Łukasz Pisarczyk, 2023. "Towards rebuilding collective bargaining? Poland in the face of contemporary challenges and changing European social policy," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 186-200, March.
    8. Maarten Keune, 2021. "Inequality between capital and labour and among wage-earners: the role of collective bargaining and trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(1), pages 29-46, February.
    9. Monika Martišková & Marta Kahancová & Jakub Kostolný, 2021. "Negotiating wage (in)equality: changing union strategies in high-wage and low-wage sectors in Czechia and Slovakia," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(1), pages 75-96, February.
    10. Magdalena Bernaciak, 2015. "All roads lead to decentralization? Collective bargaining trends and prospects in Central and Eastern Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 21(3), pages 373-381, August.
    11. Aleksandra Gregorič & Marc Steffen Rapp, 2019. "Board‐Level Employee Representation (BLER) and Firms’ Responses to Crisis," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 376-422, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:19:y:2013:i:2:p:267-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.