IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v18y2012i4p461-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A case study of temporary work agencies in the Norwegian construction sector

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Mette ØdegÃ¥rd

    (Fafo, Institute for Labour and Social Research, Oslo, Norway)

  • Øyvind Berge

    (Fafo, Institute for Labour and Social Research, Oslo, Norway)

  • Kristin Alsos

    (Fafo, Institute for Labour and Social Research, Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

The temporary work agency sector in Norway is diverse and growing. Since the EU enlargements of 2004 and 2007, it has also experienced a large influx of workers from the new EU Member States, especially in construction. This has led to more informal and undeclared business activities in the hiring industry. In this article we show some of the consequences of this development. We also discuss the impact of various national regulations in this sector and whether new EU regulation, namely the EU Directive on temporary agency work, might improve the situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Mette ØdegÃ¥rd & Øyvind Berge & Kristin Alsos, 2012. "A case study of temporary work agencies in the Norwegian construction sector," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 18(4), pages 461-470, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:18:y:2012:i:4:p:461-470
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258912458875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258912458875
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258912458875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christelle Havard & Brigitte Rorive & André Sobczak, 2009. "Client, employer and employee: Mapping a complex triangulation," Post-Print hal-00771101, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pichault, Francois & Fatien Diochon, Pauline & Nizet, Jean, 2020. "Autonomy of independent professionals: A political process perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 623-633.
    2. Lorenzo Frangi & Tingting Zhang & Rupa Banerjee, 2021. "Constructing Inequalities: Tenure Trajectories of Immigrant Workers and Union Strategies in the Milan Construction Sector," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 474-502, June.
    3. Kleopatra Petroutsatou & Ilias Ladopoulos & Konstantina Tsakelidou, 2022. "Scientometric Analysis and AHP for Hierarchizing Criteria Affecting Construction Equipment Operators’ Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Virginie Xhauflair & Benjamin Huybrechts & François Pichault, 2018. "How Can New Players Establish Themselves in Highly Institutionalized Labour Markets? A Belgian Case Study in the Area of Project†Based Work," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 370-394, June.
    5. Bas A. S. Koene & François Pichault, 2021. "Embedded Fixers, Pragmatic Experimenters, Dedicated Activists: Evaluating Third‐Party Labour Market Actors’ Initiatives for Skilled Project‐Based Workers in the Gig Economy," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 444-473, June.
    6. Helfen, Markus & Wirth, Carsten, 2020. "Management von Arbeit in pluralen Netzwerkorganisationen: Trends, Deutungen und Handlungsoptionen," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 185, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:18:y:2012:i:4:p:461-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.