IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v47y2018i2p277-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Informant Models for Measuring Group-level Variables in Small Groups

Author

Listed:
  • René Algesheimer
  • Richard P. Bagozzi
  • Utpal M. Dholakia

Abstract

We offer a new conceptualization and measurement models for constructs at the group-level of analysis in small group research. The conceptualization starts with classical notions of group behavior proposed by Tönnies, Simmel, and Weber and then draws upon plural subject theory by philosophers Gilbert and Tuomela to frame a new perspective applicable to many forms of small group behavior. In the proposed measurement model, a collective property is operationalized as shared interpersonal action that explicitly allows us to control for systematic (method) error and random error. Group members act as key informants of group properties and processes and are treated as methods in a multitrait multimethod setting to validate our models. The models are applied to data of 277 three-person groups to develop and illustrate new procedures for ascertaining variation in measures due to hypothesized construct(s), method error, and random error. Implications and guidelines for small group research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • René Algesheimer & Richard P. Bagozzi & Utpal M. Dholakia, 2018. "Key Informant Models for Measuring Group-level Variables in Small Groups," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 47(2), pages 277-313, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:47:y:2018:i:2:p:277-313
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124115613782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124115613782
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124115613782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steffi Pohl & Rolf Steyer & Katrin Kraus, 2008. "Modelling method effects as individual causal effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(1), pages 41-63, January.
    2. Bagozzi, Richard P & Yi, Youjae, 1991. "Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 426-439, March.
    3. Geyskens, I. & Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. & Scheer, L.K. & Kumar, N., 1996. "The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment : A trans-Atlantic study," Other publications TiSEM ef7c8d6c-963d-4ee7-8576-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Bagozzi, Richard P, 2000. "On the Concept of Intentional Social Action in Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 388-396, December.
    5. John C. Henderson & Soonchul Lee, 1992. "Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 757-777, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & T. Ramayah & Nalini Suppiah & Osama Alfarraj & Nasser Alalwan, 2020. "Modeling Blog Usage From a Developing Country Perspective Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    2. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Zur, Andrew & Leckie, Civilai & Webster, Cynthia M., 2012. "Cognitive and affective trust between Australian exporters and their overseas buyers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 73-79.
    4. Jody Hoffer Gittell, 2001. "Supervisory Span, Relational Coordination and Flight Departure Performance: A Reassessment of Postbureaucracy Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 468-483, August.
    5. Muhammad Shaukat Malik, Sabah Younus, 2019. "Determinants of Tax-Compliance Behaviour Explored by Slippery Slope Framework and Theory of Planned Behaviour: An Evidence from Small Business Owner," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 33-47, October.
    6. Bart A. De Jong & Katinka M. Bijlsma-Frankema & Laura B. Cardinal, 2014. "Stronger Than the Sum of Its Parts? The Performance Implications of Peer Control Combinations in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1703-1721, December.
    7. repec:idn:jimfjn:v:4:y:2018:i:2h:p:1-14 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Juan Oliveros Fontaine & Cristina del Campo & Elena Urquía-Grande, 2024. "What Are Investors Most Interested in about Sustainability? An Approach from the Scientific Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-23, April.
    9. P. Van Kenhove & K. De Wulf & D. Van Den Poelt, 2003. "Does Attitudinal Commitment to Stores Always Lead to Behavioral Loyalty? The Moderating Effect of Age," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 03/168, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    10. imen ABDENNADHER & Karim TRABELSI & Tarek ABDELLATIF, 2017. "Les influences des déterminants de la qualité relationnelle des banques islamiques sur l’engagement de leurs clients," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 8(1), June.
    11. Haberstroh, Martin & Wolf, Joachim, 2005. "Individuelle Autonomie in Projektteams," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 585, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    12. Schulze, Birgit & Wocken, Christian & Spiller, Achim, 2008. "(Dis)loyalty in the German dairy industry: a supplier relationship management view ; empirical evidence and management implications," DARE Discussion Papers 0806, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    13. Pierre Volle & Ahmed Anis Charfi, 2011. "Valeur perçue et comportements en ligne en état d'immersion : le rôle modérateur de l'implication et de l'expertise," Post-Print halshs-00638649, HAL.
    14. Bin Guo & Shasha Zhou, 2017. "What makes population perception of review helpfulness: an information processing perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 585-608, December.
    15. repec:dgr:rugsom:03g23 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Mitev, Ariel & Bauer, András & Gáti, Mirkó, 2019. "A személyes értékesítők hálózatépítési tevékenysége [Networking activities of salespersons]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 95-113.
    17. Oznur Ozkan Tektas, 2017. "Perceived justice and post-recovery satisfaction in banking service failures: Do commitment types matter?," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(4), pages 851-870, December.
    18. Sergio Da Silva & Barbara Espirito Santo & Felipe Sigrist & Raul Matsushita, 2022. "Reciprocity vs. Commitment in Bank Marketing Strategies," International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, Conscientia Beam, vol. 9(3), pages 84-92.
    19. Hye-Jin Jeon, 2020. "The Mechanism of Empathy and Relationship Commitment Through Emojis: Path to Perspective Taking, Inner Imitation, Emotional Empathy, and Relationship Commitment," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    20. Nasser Hamidi & Tahmineh Torabi Rad & Alireza Jahany, 2012. "Evaluation Of Factors Influencing Tendency Towards E- Banking In Bank Customers," Far East Journal of Marketing and Management, Far East Research Centre, vol. 2(3), pages 25-42, August.
    21. Yuan, Yang & Feng, Bo & Lai, Fujun & Collins, Brian J., 2018. "The role of trust, commitment, and learning orientation on logistic service effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 37-50.
    22. Eisenbeiss, Maik & Blechschmidt, Boris & Backhaus, Klaus & Freund, Philipp Alexander, 2012. "“The (Real) World Is Not Enough:” Motivational Drivers and User Behavior in Virtual Worlds," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 4-20.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:47:y:2018:i:2:p:277-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.