IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v51y2020i2p258-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pacing in Serious Games: Exploring the Effects of Presentation Speed on Cognitive Load, Engagement and Learning Gains

Author

Listed:
  • Dominik Petko
  • Regina Schmid
  • Andrea Cantieni

Abstract

Background. To determine the optimal speed of computer-paced serious games, the interplay of cognitive load variables and game engagement variables can serve as combined criteria. Intervention. In order to test the effects of higher or lower game speeds on different types of cognitive load and engagement , the FRESH FOOD RUNNER game was developed, which teaches the harvest seasons of different fruits and vegetables. Method. In this study, N=58 6 th grade primary school students are randomly assigned to play the serious game FRESH FOOD RUNNER at different speeds. Pre-and post-tests are used to assess learning gains, in combination with rating scales for different types of cognitive load and game engagement. Results. Results show that highest learning gains and lowest levels of extraneous cognitive load are prevalent at medium speed settings, which are neither too fast nor too slow. A similar pattern is apparent for student ratings of game engagement. Discussion and Conclusion. In consequence, learning gains, cognitive load and engagement variables can be regarded as suitable criteria to determine the optimal speed of serious games.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominik Petko & Regina Schmid & Andrea Cantieni, 2020. "Pacing in Serious Games: Exploring the Effects of Presentation Speed on Cognitive Load, Engagement and Learning Gains," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(2), pages 258-279, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:51:y:2020:i:2:p:258-279
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878120902502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878120902502
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878120902502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2008. "What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(6), pages 938-955, April.
    2. Nina Imlig-Iten & Dominik Petko, 2018. "Comparing Serious Games and Educational Simulations: Effects on Enjoyment, Deep Thinking, Interest and Cognitive Learning Gains," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(4), pages 401-422, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marieke de Wijse-van Heeswijk, 2021. "Ethics and the Simulation Facilitator: Taking your Professional Role Seriously," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(3), pages 312-332, June.
    2. J. Tuomas Harviainen, 2020. "Real, Half-Real, Irreal, Unreal," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(2), pages 111-113, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vien-Thong Nguyen & Philip Hallinger & Parinya Showanasai, 2024. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Leading Change for Sustainability in Schools Simulation: A Research and Development Project," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 55(1), pages 51-81, February.
    2. Mariani, Marcello M. & Hashemi, Novin & Wirtz, Jochen, 2023. "Artificial intelligence empowered conversational agents: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Adina Palea, 2021. "An Appraisal of Communication Practices Demonstrated by Romanian District Public Health Authorities at the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Afi Fouad El & Ouiddad Smail, 2021. "Consumer engagement in value co-creation within virtual video game communities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(4), pages 370-386, December.
    5. Luca Longo, 2018. "Experienced mental workload, perception of usability, their interaction and impact on task performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-36, August.
    6. Shahbaznezhad, Hamidreza & Dolan, Rebecca & Rashidirad, Mona, 2021. "The Role of Social Media Content Format and Platform in Users' Engagement Behavior," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 47-65.
    7. Jezdancher Watti & Máté Millner & Kata Siklósi & Hedvig Kiss & Oguz Kelemen & Dávid Pócs, 2022. "Smokers’ Engagement Behavior on Facebook: Verbalizing and Visual Expressing the Smoking Cessation Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Hwang, Angel Hsing-Chi & Oh, Jeeyun, 2020. "Interacting with background music engages E-Customers more: The impact of interactive music on consumer perception and behavioral intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Leclercq, Thomas & Poncin, Ingrid & Hammedi, Wafa, 2020. "Opening the black box of gameful experience: Implications for gamification process design," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. Peters, Twan & Işık, Öykü & Tona, Olgerta & Popovič, Aleš, 2016. "How system quality influences mobile BI use: The mediating role of engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 773-783.
    11. Carolina Herrando & Julio Jiménez-Martínez & María José Martín-De Hoyos, 2017. "Passion at first sight: how to engage users in social commerce contexts," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 701-720, December.
    12. Li, Manning & Mao, Jiye, 2015. "Hedonic or utilitarian? Exploring the impact of communication style alignment on user's perception of virtual health advisory services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 229-243.
    13. Nripesh Trivedi & Daniel Adomako Asamoah & Derek Doran, 0. "Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    14. Ayla Schwarz & Greet Cardon & Sebastien Chastin & Jeroen Stragier & Lieven De Marez & Consortium SmartLife & Ann DeSmet, 2021. "Does Dynamic Tailoring of A Narrative-Driven Exergame Result in Higher User Engagement among Adolescents? Results from A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Park, JungKun & Hong, EunPyo & Ahn, Jiseon & Hyun, Hyowon, 2023. "Role of multidimensional customer brand engagement on customer behavior for online grocery shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. Pagani, Margherita & Malacarne, Giovanni, 2017. "Experiential Engagement and Active vs. Passive Behavior in Mobile Location-based Social Networks: The Moderating Role of Privacy," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 133-148.
    17. Muna Alharbi & Lisa Kuhn & Julia Morphet, 2021. "Nursing students' engagement with social media as an extracurricular activity: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 44-55, January.
    18. Yezheng Li & Pinyi Yao & Syuhaily Osman & Norzalina Zainudin & Mohamad Fazli Sabri, 2022. "A Thematic Review on Using Food Delivery Services during the Pandemic: Insights for the Post-COVID-19 Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Omar Besbes & Yonatan Gur & Assaf Zeevi, 2016. "Optimization in Online Content Recommendation Services: Beyond Click-Through Rates," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 15-33, February.
    20. Tulia Maria Casvean & Vasile Hodorogea & Ioan Emanuel Casvean, 2021. "The Experience Created by the Social and Cultural Context Constructed by Video Games: A Digitization of Life and Death," Journal for Social Media Inquiry, Editura Lumen, vol. 3(1), pages 19-31, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:51:y:2020:i:2:p:258-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.