IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p9983-d887124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smokers’ Engagement Behavior on Facebook: Verbalizing and Visual Expressing the Smoking Cessation Process

Author

Listed:
  • Jezdancher Watti

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Máté Millner

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Kata Siklósi

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Hedvig Kiss

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Oguz Kelemen

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Dávid Pócs

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary)

Abstract

The “processes of change” and “motivational language” are common in smoker Facebook users’ comments under smoking cessation support contents. Smokers can combine this verbalization of the smoking cessation process with visual expression when they use comments and Facebook reactions at the same time. The aim of this study was to understand the relationship between processes of change, motivational language, and the Facebook reaction buttons. A total of 821 smokers’ comments were analyzed in the current study ( n = 821), which responded to image-based smoking cessation support contents. The processes of change and the motivational language used in the investigated comments were identified. These linguistic categories were compared with the usage of reaction buttons. The Facebook users who used the “Haha” reaction button wrote a significantly higher proportion of sustain talk than those who used the “Like” or “Love” reaction buttons. The Facebook users who combined the comment and “Love” reaction wrote significantly more change talk than those who did not utilize these buttons. We suggest that the “Haha” reaction may be a negative indicator, the “Like” reaction may be a neutral indicator, and the “Love” reaction may be a positive engagement indicator in terms of the smoking cessation process during Facebook-based interventions. These results may highlight how to evaluate Facebook reactions relating to smoking cessation support contents.

Suggested Citation

  • Jezdancher Watti & Máté Millner & Kata Siklósi & Hedvig Kiss & Oguz Kelemen & Dávid Pócs, 2022. "Smokers’ Engagement Behavior on Facebook: Verbalizing and Visual Expressing the Smoking Cessation Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9983-:d:887124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9983/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9983/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2008. "What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(6), pages 938-955, April.
    2. Fabio Jiménez-Zazo & Cristina Romero-Blanco & Nuria Castro-Lemus & Alberto Dorado-Suárez & Susana Aznar, 2020. "Transtheoretical Model for Physical Activity in Older Adults: Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Borawska & Konrad Biercewicz & Mariusz Borawski & Jaroslaw Duda, 2021. "The Impact of Advertisements Placement in the Computer Game on the Effectiveness of Social Campaign Messages," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 515-537.
    2. Daniel Steele & Edda Bild & Cynthia Tarlao & Catherine Guastavino, 2019. "Soundtracking the Public Space: Outcomes of the Musikiosk Soundscape Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-38, May.
    3. Mariani, Marcello M. & Hashemi, Novin & Wirtz, Jochen, 2023. "Artificial intelligence empowered conversational agents: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Fabio Jiménez-Zazo & Cristina Romero-Blanco & Esther Cabanillas & Asier Mañas & José A. Casajús & Narcís Gusi & Eva Gesteiro & Marcela González-Gross & José-Gerardo Villa-Vicente & Luis Espino-Toron &, 2022. "Differences among Sociodemographic Variables, Physical Fitness Levels, and Body Composition with Adherence to Regular Physical Activity in Older Adults from the EXERNET Multicenter Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Hana Ko, 2021. "Daily Time Use by Activity of Community-Dwelling Older Koreans: Focus on Health Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Nripesh Trivedi & Daniel Adomako Asamoah & Derek Doran, 2018. "Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 239-257, April.
    7. Julia Troll & Ivo Blohm & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Why Incorporating a Platform-Intermediary can Increase Crowdsourcees’ Engagement," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 433-450, August.
    8. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Adina Palea, 2021. "An Appraisal of Communication Practices Demonstrated by Romanian District Public Health Authorities at the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Afi Fouad El & Ouiddad Smail, 2021. "Consumer engagement in value co-creation within virtual video game communities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(4), pages 370-386, December.
    10. Luca Longo, 2018. "Experienced mental workload, perception of usability, their interaction and impact on task performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-36, August.
    11. Zixing Shen & Michael J. Pritchard, 2022. "Cognitive engagement on social media: A study of the effects of visual cueing in educational videos," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1253-1267, September.
    12. Shahbaznezhad, Hamidreza & Dolan, Rebecca & Rashidirad, Mona, 2021. "The Role of Social Media Content Format and Platform in Users' Engagement Behavior," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 47-65.
    13. Fang, Jiaming & Zhao, Zhirong & Wen, Chao & Wang, Ruping, 2017. "Design and performance attributes driving mobile travel application engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 269-283.
    14. Maria Isabel Cardona & Marina Weißenborn & Isabel Zöllinger & Eric Sven Kroeber & Alexander Bauer & Melanie Luppa & Alexander Pabst & David Czock & Hans-Helmut König & Birgitt Wiese & Jochen Gensichen, 2022. "Physical Activity Determinants in Older German Adults at Increased Dementia Risk with Multimorbidity: Baseline Results of the AgeWell.de Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Lin Shi & Katharine J. Mach & Sangwon Suh & Adam Brandt, 2022. "Functionality‐based life cycle assessment framework: An information and communication technologies (ICT) product case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 782-800, June.
    16. Wenrui Wang, 2023. "The Ways that Digital Technologies Inform Visitor's Engagement with Cultural Heritage Sites: Informal Learning in the Digital Era ," GATR Journals gjbssr628, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    17. Caitríona Ní Shé & Eabhnat Ní Fhloinn & Ciarán Mac an Bhaird, 2023. "Student Engagement with Technology-Enhanced Resources in Mathematics in Higher Education: A Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-34, February.
    18. Heather L. O'Brien, 2017. "Antecedents and learning outcomes of online news engagement," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2809-2820, December.
    19. Hwang, Angel Hsing-Chi & Oh, Jeeyun, 2020. "Interacting with background music engages E-Customers more: The impact of interactive music on consumer perception and behavioral intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Bitrián, Paula & Buil, Isabel & Catalán, Sara, 2021. "Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 170-185.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9983-:d:887124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.