IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v5y2015i2p2158244015581650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of Information System Project Success Model

Author

Listed:
  • A’ang Subiyakto
  • Abd. Rahman Ahlan
  • Syopiansyah Jaya Putra
  • Mira Kartiwi

Abstract

This article illustrates how influential arguments were used to validate an information system (IS) project success model using the inductive-qualitative method rather than continual hypothesis testing. The purpose of the study was to explore the validity and feasibility of the model using a focus group study (FGS) to respond that many IS scholars were under more and more pressure in their research model validations. Most of them claimed that the quantitative validation was only the method to validate their models. Although they may have performed the qualitative validation, only a few of them realized that they have applied this method. This article will be valuable, especially to prove, describe, and illuminate the context and condition where the model validation had been performed qualitatively before the scholar carried out quantitatively the validation. The results represent the four model validation points regarding the modeling process, methodological aspect, and resource availability of the research and its implementation recommendations. A good reference point for IS scholars whose goal to validate their model feasibilities, especially using the qualitative validation method.

Suggested Citation

  • A’ang Subiyakto & Abd. Rahman Ahlan & Syopiansyah Jaya Putra & Mira Kartiwi, 2015. "Validation of Information System Project Success Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:2158244015581650
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244015581650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015581650
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244015581650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beringer, Claus & Jonas, Daniel & Kock, Alexander, 2013. "Behavior of Internal Stakeholders in Project Portfolio Management and Its Impact on Success," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63318, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Nils Urbach & Stefan Smolnik & Gerold Riempp, 2009. "The State of Research on Information Systems Success," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(4), pages 315-325, August.
    3. Allen S. Lee, 1991. "Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 342-365, November.
    4. Beringer, Claus & Jonas, Daniel & Kock, Alexander, 2013. "Behavior of Internal Stakeholders in Project Portfolio Management and Its Impact on Success," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63280, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Salgado & Ana C. L. Vieira & Anália Torres & Mónica D. Oliveira, 2020. "Selecting Indicators to Monitor and Assess Environmental Health in a Portuguese Urban Setting: A Participatory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grama-Vigouroux, Simona & Saidi, Sana & Berthinier-Poncet, Anne & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Madanamoothoo, Allane, 2020. "From closed to open: A comparative stakeholder approach for developing open innovation activities in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 230-244.
    2. Aga, Deribe Assefa, 2016. "Factors affecting the success of development projects : A behavioral perspective," Other publications TiSEM 867ae95e-d53d-4a68-ad46-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Soltani, Elham, 2020. "Business and project strategy alignment: ICT project success in Iran," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Mariusz Hofman & Seweryn Spalek & Grzegorz Grela, 2017. "Shedding New Light on Project Portfolio Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Alessandra Montenegro & Marina Dobrota & Marija Todorovic & Teodora Slavinski & Vladimir Obradovic, 2021. "Impact of Construction Project Managers’ Emotional Intelligence on Project Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Mohammad Bilal Shaukat & Khawaja Fawad Latif & Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje, 2022. "Revisiting the relationship between sustainable project management and project success: The moderating role of stakeholder engagement and team building," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 58-75, February.
    7. Tian, Yuanyuan & Bai, Libiao & Wei, Lan & Zheng, Kanyin & Zhou, Xinyu, 2022. "Modeling for project portfolio benefit prediction via a GA-BP neural network," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    8. Eunice Kabahinda & Rogers Mwesigwa, 2023. "Trust Mediates the Relationship Between Stakeholder Behavior and Stakeholder Management of Public Private Partnership Projects in Uganda," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 245-263, March.
    9. Hermano, Víctor & Martín-Cruz, Natalia, 2016. "The role of top management involvement in firms performing projects: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3447-3458.
    10. Foroogh Ghasemi & Mohammad Hossein Mahmoudi Sari & Vahidreza Yousefi & Reza Falsafi & Jolanta Tamošaitienė, 2018. "Project Portfolio Risk Identification and Analysis, Considering Project Risk Interactions and Using Bayesian Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Milis Nilgun Caibula & Constantin Militaru, 2021. "Stakeholders Influence on the Closing Phase of Projects," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1Sup1), pages 136-148, April.
    12. Tuan M. Ha & Ockie J. H. Bosch & Nam C. Nguyen, 2016. "Practical Contributions of the Systems-Based Evolutionary Learning Laboratory to Knowledge and Stakeholder Management," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 261-275, June.
    13. Ivy Hawah Taana, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework on The Successful Adoption of Project Management Methodologies in Ghana," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 10(1), pages 409-422, August.
    14. Arvin Sahaym & Joseph Vithayathil & Suprateek Sarker & Saonee Sarker & Niels Bjørn-Andersen, 2023. "Value Destruction in Information Technology Ecosystems: A Mixed-Method Investigation with Interpretive Case Study and Analytical Modeling," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 508-531, June.
    15. Xuequn Wang & Leonard M. Jessup, 2014. "A Review and Synthesis of Entrepreneurship Research: Towards an Integrative Model of Dependent Variables," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 23(2), pages 163-199, September.
    16. Joerg Becker & Bjoern Niehaves & Karsten Klose, 2005. "A Framework for Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-1.
    17. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    18. Jansen, E. Pieter, 2002. "The use of performance information case studies in local social services departments," Research Report 02A19, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    19. Allen S. Lee & Richard L. Baskerville, 2003. "Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 221-243, September.
    20. Bradley C. Wheeler, 2002. "NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 125-146, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:2158244015581650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.