IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241261130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Digital Green Strategic Orientation On Digital Green Innovation Performance: From the Perspective of Digital Green Business Model Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Shi Yin
  • Yuanyuan Yu
  • Nan Zhang

Abstract

Digital technology is gradually penetrating into all kinds of business of green innovation and green development. However, China’s industrial Internet technology foundation is weak. Scholars’ researches on the impact of digital green strategic orientation (DGSO) on digital green innovation performance (DGIP) and the intermediary role of digital green business model innovation (DGBMI) is relatively backward. Therefore, it is particularly important to divide the dimensions of DGSO from the perspective of DGBMI to describe the mechanism of DGIP. In this study, multiple regression approach was used to test the effect of DGSO on DGIP. The mediating role of DGBMI was explored through 562 questionnaires. In addition, the study divides the DGSO into three dimensions: green market orientation (GMO), digital green technology orientation (DGTO), and government orientation. DGBMI is divided into two dimensions: efficiency type and integration type. The results are as follows. (1) GMO, DGTO and government orientation all have positive effects on the improvement of DGIP. (2) GMO has a greater impact on integration DGBMI (IDGBMI). The influence of DGTO on efficient DGBMI (EDGBMI) is more significant. (3) Government orientation has a positive impact on EDGBMI. The influence of DGSO on DGIP can be realized through the intermediary role of EDGBMI and IDGBMI. The essence of this research is to help enterprises understand the characteristics of internal and external environment and make digital-green strategy-oriented choices to improve their DGIP. This study has a certain theoretical contribution to elucidating the influence of DGSO on DGIP and the mediating role of DGBMI. This study also provides a practical basis for enterprises’ digital green innovation practice based on their own environmental optimization and matching of DGSO to improve competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi Yin & Yuanyuan Yu & Nan Zhang, 2024. "The Effect of Digital Green Strategic Orientation On Digital Green Innovation Performance: From the Perspective of Digital Green Business Model Innovation," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241261130
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241261130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241261130
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241261130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kashif Abbass & Halima Begum & A. S. A. Ferdous Alam & Abd Hair Awang & Mohammed Khalifa Abdelsalam & Ibrahim Mohammed Massoud Egdair & Ratnaria Wahid, 2022. "Fresh Insight through a Keynesian Theory Approach to Investigate the Economic Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "Digital green value co-creation behavior, digital green network embedding and digital green innovation performance: moderating effects of digital green network fragmentation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Ilias O. Pappas & Patrick Mikalef & Michail N. Giannakos & John Krogstie & George Lekakos, 2018. "Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 479-491, August.
    4. Md. Ahashan Habib & Yukun Bao & Aboobucker Ilmudeen, 2020. "The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and green supply chain management practices on sustainable firm performance," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1743616-174, January.
    5. N. Venkatraman, 1989. "Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 942-962, August.
    6. Kashif Abbass & Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi & Abdul Basit & Tehmina Fiaz Qazi & Huaming Song & Halima Begum, 2021. "Uncovering Effects of Hot Potatoes in Banking System: Arresting Die-Hard Issues," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    7. Remedios Hernández-Linares & Franz W. Kellermanns & María Concepción López-Fernández, 2021. "Dynamic capabilities and SME performance: The moderating effect of market orientation," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 162-195, January.
    8. Tsui-Yii Shih, 2018. "Determinants of Enterprises Radical Innovation and Performance: Insights into Strategic Orientation of Cultural and Creative Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Peterson, Robert A, 1994. "A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(2), pages 381-391, September.
    10. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2008. "The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Ardito, Lorenzo & Raby, Simon & Albino, Vito & Bertoldi, Bernardo, 2021. "The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 44-56.
    12. Lv, Chengchao & Shao, Changhua & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2021. "Green technology innovation and financial development: Do environmental regulation and innovation output matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Tommy Clausen & Einar Rasmussen, 2013. "Parallel business models and the innovativeness of research-based spin-off ventures," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(6), pages 836-849, December.
    14. Manman Wang & Shuai Lian & Shi Yin & Hengmin Dong, 2020. "A Three-Player Game Model for Promoting the Diffusion of Green Technology in Manufacturing Enterprises from the Perspective of Supply and Demand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Abbass, Kashif & Sharif, Arshian & Song, Huaming & Ali, Malik Tayyab & Khan, Farina & Amin, Nabila, 2022. "Do geopolitical oil price risk, global macroeconomic fundamentals relate Islamic and conventional stock market? Empirical evidence from QARDL approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2007. "Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 181-199, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imran M. Ilyas & Nadine Kammerlander & Roxana Turturea & Marc van Essen, 2024. "When Business Model Innovation Creates Value for Companies: A Meta‐Analysis on Institutional Contingencies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1825-1883, July.
    2. Bouwman, Harry & de Reuver, Mark & Nikou, Shahrokh, 2017. "The impact of Digitalization on Business Models: How IT Artefacts, Social Media, and Big Data Force Firms to Innovate Their Business Model," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168475, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Zheng, Leven J. & Xiong, Chang & Chen, Xihui & Li, Chung-Sheng, 2021. "Product innovation in entrepreneurial firms: How business model design influences disruptive and adoptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Bouwman, Harry & Nikou, Shahrokh & de Reuver, Mark, 2019. "Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9).
    5. Linlin Zheng & Yashi Dong & Jineng Chen & Yuyi Li & Wenzhuo Li & Miaolian Su, 2022. "Impact of Crisis on Sustainable Business Model Innovation—The Role of Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    6. Sena, Vania & Nocker, Manuela, 2021. "AI and Business Models: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 14(4), pages 324-397, May.
    7. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    8. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    9. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Wissal Affes & Habib Affes, 2022. "Business Model and Firm Performance in Tunisian Firms: a Mediated Moderation Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2822-2839, December.
    11. Chengde Zheng & Xiaofeng Yu & Qiming Jin, 2017. "How user relationships affect user perceived value propositions of enterprises on social commerce platforms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1261-1271, December.
    12. Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen & Wencke Gwozdz & Kerli Kant Hvass, 2018. "Exploring the Relationship Between Business Model Innovation, Corporate Sustainability, and Organisational Values within the Fashion Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 267-284, May.
    13. Breunig, Karl Joachim & Kvålshaugen, Ragnhild & Hydle, Katja Maria, 2014. "Knowing your boundaries: Integration opportunities in international professional service firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 502-511.
    14. Shuting Chen & Dengke Yu, 2024. "What Drives Business Model Innovation? Exploring the Role of Knowledge Management Capability in Chinese Top-Ranking Innovative Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6390-6424, June.
    15. Xuerong Li & Han Qiao & Shouyang Wang, 2017. "Exploring evolution and emerging trends in business model study: a co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 869-887, May.
    16. Gian Luca Casali & Mirko Perano & Andrea Moretta Tartaglione & Roxanne Zolin, 2018. "How Business Idea Fit Affects Sustainability and Creates Opportunities for Value Co-Creation in Nascent Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Barneto, Pascal & Ouvrard, Stéphane, 2015. "Is the firm's business model related to segment reporting?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 122-137.
    18. Dehkordi, Rashid & Ahokangas, Petri & Evers, Natasha & Sorvisto, Mika, 2024. "Business model design for Electric Commercial Vehicles (ECVs): An ecosystemic perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. Zhang, Yimeng & Ma, Xinyu & Pang, Jianing & Xing, Hailong & Wang, Jian, 2023. "The impact of digital transformation of manufacturing on corporate performance — The mediating effect of business model innovation and the moderating effect of innovation capability," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Liu, Ailan & Dai, Sijia & Wang, Zhixuan, 2023. "Environmental protection tax on enterprise environmental, social and governance performance: A multi-perspective analysis based on financing constraints," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241261130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.