IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241260998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanisms That Promote and Support Family Preservation for Children at the Edge of Care: A Realist Synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Redgate
  • Deborah Smart
  • Simon Barrett
  • Carrie Barron
  • Samantha Burns
  • Hilda Frost
  • William McGovern
  • Vikki Peart
  • Emma Adams
  • Hayley Alderson
  • Eileen Kaner
  • Ruth McGovern

Abstract

Children in care of the state are amongst the most disadvantaged in society. They have often experienced adverse childhood experiences leading to their care entry including abuse and neglect. Longitudinal data suggests problems children in care of the state experience within adolescence persist into adulthood, showing “a continuing legacy of adversity.†Emerging literature shows that edge of care interventions can bring about benefits. These interventions support families to meet their child’s needs and prevent, or reduce, the likelihood of children going into care. However, it is not clear how or why these interventions work. It is important to develop this understanding to inform the development of effective, theory-informed practice to benefit this population. We reviewed and synthesised published literature to expose mechanisms by which interventions may promote and support family preservation for children at the edge of care. Our synthesis uses a realist approach to examine mechanisms by which interventions, in various contexts, can promote and support family preservation for children at the edge of care. Previous work by the team shaped the initial search strategy and in line with RAMESES realist review guidelines, no restrictions were placed on the types of study to be included in the synthesis. From 7,530 potentially relevant references identified, 61 papers were included in final extraction. Extracted data was themed, prior to developing narrative and formulating programme theories. Effective edge of care service operation seemed to be based on four core programme theories pertaining to the need for family skills training, home-based delivery, dedicated worker, and rapid response to need.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Redgate & Deborah Smart & Simon Barrett & Carrie Barron & Samantha Burns & Hilda Frost & William McGovern & Vikki Peart & Emma Adams & Hayley Alderson & Eileen Kaner & Ruth McGovern, 2024. "Mechanisms That Promote and Support Family Preservation for Children at the Edge of Care: A Realist Synthesis," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241260998
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241260998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241260998
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241260998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dagenais, Christian & Brière, Frédéric N. & Gratton, Geneviève & Dupont, Didier, 2009. "Brief and intensive family support program to prevent emergency placements: Lessons learned from a process evaluation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 594-600, May.
    2. Berry, Marianne, 1991. "The assessment of imminence of risk of placement: Lessons from a family preservation program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 239-256.
    3. Jeanne Gubbels & Claudia E. van der Put & Mark Assink, 2019. "The Effectiveness of Parent Training Programs for Child Maltreatment and Their Components: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-31, July.
    4. Marcenko, Maureen O. & Spence, Michael & Samost, Linda, 1996. "Outcomes of a home visitation trial for pregnant and postpartum women at-risk for child placement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 243-259.
    5. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    6. Forsythe, Peter, 1992. "Homebuilders and family preservation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(1-2), pages 37-47.
    7. Cameron, Claire & Hollingworth, Katie & Schoon, Ingrid & van Santen, Eric & Schröer, Wolfgang & Ristikari, Tiina & Heino, Tarja & Pekkarinen, Elina, 2018. "Care leavers in early adulthood: How do they fare in Britain, Finland and Germany?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 163-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bagdasaryan, Sofya, 2005. "Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question of effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 615-635, June.
    2. Simon, James David & D'Andrade, Amy & Hsu, Hsun-Ta, 2021. "The intersection of child welfare services and public assistance: An analysis of dual-system involvement and successful family preservation completion on a maltreatment re-report," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Keegan Eamon, Mary & Kopels, Sandra, 2004. "`For reasons of poverty': court challenges to child welfare practices and mandated programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(9), pages 821-836, September.
    4. Power, Luke & Hardy, Mark, 2024. "Predictors of care leavers’ health outcomes: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Artamonova, Alyona & Guerreiro, Maria das Dores & Höjer, Ingrid, 2020. "Time and context shaping the transition from out-of-home care to adulthood in Portugal," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Chambers, Ruth M. & Crutchfield, Rashida M. & Goddu Harper, Stephanie G. & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2018. "Family reunification in child welfare practice: A pilot study of parent and staff experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 221-231.
    7. Toivonen, Katri & Salokekkilä, Pirkko & Puustelli, Anne & Häggman-Laitila, Arja, 2020. "Somatic and mental symptoms, medical treatments and service use in aftercare – Document analysis of Finnish care leavers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    8. Hagleitner, Wolfgang & Sting, Stephan & Maran, Thomas, 2022. "Socio-economic status and living situation of care leavers in Austria," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Roberts, Louise & Rees, Alyson & Mannay, Dawn & Bayfield, Hannah & Corliss, Cindy & Diaz, Clive & Vaughan, Rachael, 2021. "Corporate parenting in a pandemic: Considering the delivery and receipt of support to care leavers in Wales during Covid-19," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Sacker, Amanda & Lacey, Rebecca E. & Maughan, Barbara & Murray, Emily T., 2022. "Out-of-home care in childhood and socio-economic functioning in adulthood: ONS Longitudinal study 1971–2011," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Maher, Erin J. & Marcynyszyn, Lyscha A. & Corwin, Tyler W. & Hodnett, Rhenda, 2011. "Dosage matters: The relationship between participation in the Nurturing Parenting Program for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers and subsequent child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1426-1434, August.
    12. Dolbin-MacNab, Megan L. & Smith, Gregory C. & Hayslip, Bert, 2022. "The role of social services in reunified custodial grandfamilies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. Economidis, George & Farnbach, Sara & Eades, Anne-Marie & Falster, Kathleen & Shakeshaft, Anthony, 2023. "Enablers and barriers to the implementation of Multisystemic Therapy for Child Abuse and Neglect (MST-CAN) into the routine delivery of child protection services in New South Wales, Australia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Dagenais, Christian & Begin, Jean & Bouchard, Camil & Fortin, Daniel, 2004. "Impact of intensive family support programs: a synthesis of evaluation studies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 249-263, March.
    15. Itzhaki-Braun, Yael & Sulimani-Aidan, Yafit, 2022. "Determination of life satisfaction among young women care leavers from the Ultraorthodox Jewish community," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    16. Jedwab, Merav & Chatterjee, Anusha & Shaw, Terry V., 2018. "Caseworkers' insights and experiences with successful reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 56-63.
    17. Ko Ling Chan, 2019. "Child Victimization in the Context of Family Violence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-5, September.
    18. Cash, Scottye J., 2001. "Risk assessment in child welfare: the art and science," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(11), pages 811-830, November.
    19. Lietz, Cynthia A., 2009. "Examining families' perceptions of intensive in-home services: A mixed methods study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1337-1345, December.
    20. Isabel Garces-Davila & Ashley Stewart-Tufescu & Janice Linton & Julie-Anne McCarthy & Sonya Gill & Aleksandra Ciochon Newton & Samantha Salmon & Tamara Taillieu & Tracie O. Afifi, 2024. "Parenting Interventions to Prevent and Reduce Physical Punishment: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-33, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241260998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.