IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231209891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Assessment and Learning Outcome Evaluation of Interior Architecture Students Using Flipped Versus Traditional Classroom Education Models

Author

Listed:
  • Gurkan Ozenen

Abstract

The aim of this present study is to determine the self-evaluation of learning outcomes of students using flipped classroom versus traditional learning education models in the senior year (fourth year) interior architecture students. This research was conducted for one full semester of senior year interior architecture graduate students, which takes 14-weeks of a time period each lasted 6 hr of a week which makes a total of 84 hr for a semester. Two different education models were used for a one-semester course for a total number of 112 students. The students were all informed about flipped and traditional educational models prior to the class selection. The groups were designated by the students’ education model choice. Class A was 57 students who attended to the flipped classroom model and Class B were 55 students who attended to the traditional lecture-based education Both courses have the same credit. The GPA scores of flipped classroom attendees were found to be higher than the traditional class GPA score rates. The student evaluation forms were determined to be better in the flipped classroom. The change of students to using flipped classroom from the traditional method leads to a student-centered education instead of teacher-centered education.

Suggested Citation

  • Gurkan Ozenen, 2023. "Self-Assessment and Learning Outcome Evaluation of Interior Architecture Students Using Flipped Versus Traditional Classroom Education Models," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231209891
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231209891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231209891
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231209891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandi Findlay-Thompson & Peter Mombourquette, 2014. "Evaluation Of A Flipped Classroom In An Undergraduate Business Course," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(1), pages 63-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dr. Sikhangezile Nkomo & Dr Leah Makonye, 2023. "Assessing Early Childhood Development Teachers’ Perceptions on the Use of the Flipped Classroom Method in the Teaching and Learning Process in Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(6), pages 1637-1655, June.
    2. Jayendra S. Gokhale, 2021. "Implementing the Flipped Classroom in an Undergraduate Corporate Finance Course," International Journal of Contemporary Education, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 13-23, April.
    3. Zan Li & Wenrui Jiang, 2022. "Research on the Teaching Reform of Inorganic Chemistry Based on SPOC and FCM during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Parisa Abedi* & Ehsan Namaziandost & Samira Akbari, 2019. "The Impact of Flipped Classroom Instruction on Iranian Upper-Intermediate EFL Learners' Writing Skill," English Literature and Language Review, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(9), pages 164-172, 09-2019.
    5. Jamie Eng & Kenneth Leong & Janis K. Zaima, 2018. "Using An Active Learning Approach To Close The Loop," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8.
    6. Pei-Wen Huang & Yan-Ling Hwang & Kuo-Shu Huang, 2023. "The Investigation on College Students' English Writing Achievements and Perceptions towards a Flipped Instructional Model," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(5), pages 1-65, May.
    7. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Patricia Bachiller & Guillermo Badía, 2020. "The Flip Teaching as Tool to Improving Students’ Sustainable Learning Performance in a Financial Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    9. Todd Broker & Victor Raj & Simone Silva, 2018. "Flipping the Econ Class: Reconsidered," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(2), pages 1-21, Fall.
    10. Suhkyung Shin & Kyungbin Kwon & Jiyoon Jung, 2022. "Collaborative Learning in the Flipped University Classroom: Identifying Team Process Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    11. Dzakpasu Prince Edem & Cynthia Adjartey, 2020. "Flipped Learning Model and Pre-Service Teachers’ Computer Literacy Performance in Ghanaian Colleges of Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(1), pages 30-36, January.
    12. Cosme J Gómez-Carrasco & José Monteagudo-Fernández & Juan R Moreno-Vera & Marta Sainz-Gómez, 2020. "Evaluation of a gamification and flipped-classroom program used in teacher training: Perception of learning and outcome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Cosme J. Gómez-Carrasco & Pedro Miralles-Martinez & Olaia Fontal & Alex Ibañez-Etxeberria, 2020. "Cultural Heritage and Methodological Approaches—An Analysis through Initial Training of History Teachers (Spain–England)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231209891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.