IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0236083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a gamification and flipped-classroom program used in teacher training: Perception of learning and outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Cosme J Gómez-Carrasco
  • José Monteagudo-Fernández
  • Juan R Moreno-Vera
  • Marta Sainz-Gómez

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the arrival of new methodological horizons in teacher training. Technological resources and mobile connections play a major role in these studies. At the same time, there is a focus on play to increase commitment and motivation. It is in this context that gamification and flipped-classroom strategies have arisen. This paper presents the results of a training program with future Primary Education teachers using gamification and flipped-classroom strategies and techniques. The aim was that teachers in training acquire competences in proposing innovative teaching units. The learning achieved through the program was evaluated by collecting perceptions via a questionnaire and using an observation scale of the didactic units designed. The program was implemented in four classroom groups (N = 210) at the University of Murcia (Spain). Descriptive statistics are shown; mean tests (t of Student and ANOVA of one factor); non-parametric tests (U-Mann Whitney test); and Pearson correlations between subscales. The data show a very positive assessment of the learning achieved and the strategies applied in the training program. The learning outcomes were satisfactory, although lower than perceived. Some differences between class groups and gender are discussed, and some weaknesses of the program are pointed out.

Suggested Citation

  • Cosme J Gómez-Carrasco & José Monteagudo-Fernández & Juan R Moreno-Vera & Marta Sainz-Gómez, 2020. "Evaluation of a gamification and flipped-classroom program used in teacher training: Perception of learning and outcome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236083
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236083
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236083&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0236083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byung-Do Kim & Mengze Shi & Kannan Srinivasan, 2001. "Reward Programs and Tacit Collusion," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 99-120, June.
    2. Sandi Findlay-Thompson & Peter Mombourquette, 2014. "Evaluation Of A Flipped Classroom In An Undergraduate Business Course," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(1), pages 63-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Dorotic, Matilda & Verhoef, Peter C. & Fok, Dennis & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2014. "Reward redemption effects in a loyalty program when customers choose how much and when to redeem," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 339-355.
    3. Kang, Jun & Alejandro, Thomas Brashear & Groza, Mark D., 2015. "Customer–company identification and the effectiveness of loyalty programs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 464-471.
    4. Kutsal Dogan & Ernan Haruvy & Ram Rao, 2010. "Who should practice price discrimination using rebates in an asymmetric duopoly?," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 61-90, March.
    5. Dr. Sikhangezile Nkomo & Dr Leah Makonye, 2023. "Assessing Early Childhood Development Teachers’ Perceptions on the Use of the Flipped Classroom Method in the Teaching and Learning Process in Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(6), pages 1637-1655, June.
    6. Steven M. Shugan, 2005. "Brand Loyalty Programs: Are They Shams?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 185-193.
    7. Alessandro Acquisti & Hal R. Varian, 2005. "Conditioning Prices on Purchase History," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 367-381, May.
    8. Yingxiao Li & Jianheng Zhou, 2023. "Modeling the relationship between fairness concern and customer loyalty in dual distribution channel," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Iva Slivar & Tea Golja, 2015. "Boosting Corporate Social Responsibility in Tourist Destinations through Loyalty Programs and Stakeholder Collaboration," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(4), pages 122-133.
    10. Gandomi, Amir & Zolfaghari, Saeed, 2018. "To tier or not to tier: An analysis of multitier loyalty programs׳ optimality conditions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-36.
    11. Bies, Suzanne M.T.A. & Bronnenberg, Bart J. & Gijsbrechts, Els, 2021. "How push messaging impacts consumer spending and reward redemption in store-loyalty programs," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 877-899.
    12. Bies, Suzanne, 2022. "Examining the effectiveness of activation techniques on consumer behavior in temporary loyalty programs," Other publications TiSEM ade86df3-4846-4318-938f-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Julian Villanueva & Pradeep Bhardwaj & Sridhar Balasubramanian & Yuxin Chen, 2007. "Customer relationship management in competitive environments: The positive implications of a short-term focus," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 99-129, June.
    14. Jayendra S. Gokhale, 2021. "Implementing the Flipped Classroom in an Undergraduate Corporate Finance Course," International Journal of Contemporary Education, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 13-23, April.
    15. Bakhtiari, Ali & Murthi, B.P.S. & Steffes, Erin, 2013. "Evaluating the Effect of Affinity Card Programs on Customer Profitability Using Propensity Score Matching," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 83-97.
    16. Kivetz, Ran & Simonson, Itamar, 2003. "The Role of Effort Advantage in Consumer Response to Loyalty Programs: The Idiosyncratic Fit Heuristic," Research Papers 1738r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    17. Amir Gandomi & Amirhossein Bazargan & Saeed Zolfaghari, 2019. "Designing competitive loyalty programs: a stochastic game-theoretic model to guide the choice of reward structure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 280(1), pages 267-298, September.
    18. Nastasoiu, Alina & Vandenbosch, Mark, 2019. "Competing with loyalty: How to design successful customer loyalty reward programs," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 207-214.
    19. Liang Guo, 2023. "Overage Charge or Loyalty Discount: When Should Extra Consumptions Be Penalized or Rewarded?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 614-633, May.
    20. Jiwoong Shin & K. Sudhir, 2010. "A Customer Management Dilemma: When Is It Profitable to Reward One's Own Customers?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 671-689, 07-08.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.