IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i3p21582440221126511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowdfunding Platforms as a Substitute Financing Source for Young Saudi Entrepreneurs: Empirical Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Saleh Alshebami

Abstract

This study investigated the factors determining the behavioral intention of young Saudi entrepreneurs to use crowdfunding to finance their small enterprises. The capacity of behavioral intention to predict the use behavior of crowdfunding platforms was also assessed. Partial least squares-based structural equation modeling method (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze responses collected from 270 young Saudi entrepreneurs (qualified students) attending the Community College of Abqaiq in Saudi Arabia, which is affiliated with King Faisal University. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) with extensions of three constructs was employed. The findings revealed that performance expectancy, social influence, perceived trust and perceived risks predicted the behavioral intention of young Saudi entrepreneurs to use crowdfunding platforms to finance their small enterprises, whereas effort expectancy, facilitating conditions and trialability had no significant predictive effect on the same behavioral intention. It was further reported that behavioral intention could also predict the use behavior of young Saudi entrepreneurs on crowdfunding platforms. The overall results indicated that the model explained 55.4% of the variance in behavioral intention and 38.3% of the variance in use behavior of young Saudi entrepreneurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Saleh Alshebami, 2022. "Crowdfunding Platforms as a Substitute Financing Source for Young Saudi Entrepreneurs: Empirical Evidence," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221126511
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221126511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221126511
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221126511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil Lee & Ross Brown, 2017. "Innovation, SMEs and the liability of distance: the demand and supply of bank funding in UK peripheral regions," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 233-260.
    2. Ali Saleh Alshebami, 2021. "The Influence of Psychological Capital on Employees’ Innovative Behavior: Mediating Role of Employees’ Innovative Intention and Employees’ Job Satisfaction," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    3. Cumming, Douglas J. & Johan, Sofia A. & Zhang, Yelin, 2019. "The role of due diligence in crowdfunding platforms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Franklin Allen & Xian Gu & Julapa Jagtiani, 2021. "A Survey of Fintech Research and Policy Discussion," Review of Corporate Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(3-4), pages 259-339, July.
    5. Heba Gazzaz, 2019. "Crowdfunding in Saudi Arabia: A Case Study of the Manafa Platform," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(11), pages 1-72, November.
    6. Hemer, Joachim, 2011. "A snapshot on crowdfunding," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R2/2011, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    7. Younghwan Moon & Junseok Hwang, 2018. "Crowdfunding as an Alternative Means for Funding Sustainable Appropriate Technology: Acceptance Determinants of Backers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    9. Susana Bernardino & J. Freitas Santos, 2020. "Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study on Knowledge, Benefits and Barriers Perceived by Young Potential Entrepreneurs," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Berger, Allen N. & Black, Lamont K., 2011. "Bank size, lending technologies, and small business finance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 724-735, March.
    12. Paschen, Jeannette, 2017. "Choose wisely: Crowdfunding through the stages of the startup life cycle," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 179-188.
    13. Camille Lacan & Pierre Desmet, 2017. "Does the crowdfunding platform matter? Risks of negative attitudes in two-sided markets," Post-Print hal-02132606, HAL.
    14. Oliveira, Tiago & Faria, Miguel & Thomas, Manoj Abraham & Popovič, Aleš, 2014. "Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 689-703.
    15. Grewal, Dhruv & Gotlieb, Jerry & Marmorstein, Howard, 1994. "The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 145-153, June.
    16. Jerry Coakley & Aristogenis Lazos, 2021. "New Developments in Equity Crowdfunding: A Review," Review of Corporate Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(3-4), pages 341-405, July.
    17. Piotr Pazowski & Witold Czudec, 2014. "Economic Prospects and Conditions of Crowdfunding," Human Capital without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for Quality of Life; Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2014,, ToKnowPress.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yapeng Li, 2022. "What Attracts College Students to Start a Business in Rural Areas?—A Qualitative Comparative Analysis from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Thi Mai Anh Nguyen & Thi Hue Nguyen & Hieu Hoc Le, 2022. "Online Shopping in Relationship with Perception, Attitude, and Subjective Norm during COVID-19 Outbreak: The Case of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Florentina Kurniasari & Elissa Dwi Lestari & Hendy Tannady, 2023. "Pursuing Long-Term Business Performance: Investigating the Effects of Financial and Technological Factors on Digital Adoption to Leverage SME Performance and Business Sustainability—Evidence from Indo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Ali Saleh Alshebami & Abdullah Hamoud Ali Seraj & Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Abdullah Sultan Al Shammre & Salem Handhal Al Marri & Abdalwali Lutfi & Mostafa Aboulnour Salem & Ashraf Mahrous Nour Zaher, 2023. "Improving Social Performance through Innovative Small Green Businesses: Knowledge Sharing and Green Entrepreneurial Intention as Antecedents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Jing Sun & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Dasong Deng & Darina Saxunova & Ahsanuddin Haider & Mohammed Arshad Khan, 2022. "The Significance of Urban Rail Transit Systems in Mitigating Air Pollution Effects: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-10, October.
    6. Yoshiaki Nose & Chie Hosomi, 2023. "What makes equity crowdfunding successful in Japan? Testing the signaling and lack of financial literacy hypotheses," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 19(4), pages 146-183.
    7. Arwa Mohammed Asiri & Sabah Abdullah Al-Somali & Rozan Omar Maghrabi, 2024. "The Integration of Sustainable Technology and Big Data Analytics in Saudi Arabian SMEs: A Path to Improved Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincenzo Butticè & Silvio Vismara, 2022. "Inclusive digital finance: the industry of equity crowdfunding," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1224-1241, August.
    2. Douglas Cumming & Lars Hornuf & Moein Karami & Denis Schweizer, 2023. "Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1103-1128, February.
    3. Silvio Vismara, 2022. "Expanding corporate finance perspectives to equity crowdfunding," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1629-1639, December.
    4. Etienne Schraven & Elco van Burg & Marco van Gelderen & Enno Masurel, 2020. "Predictions of Crowdfunding Campaign Success: The Influence of First Impressions on Accuracy and Positivity," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Carolin Bock & Sven Siebeneicher & Jens Rockel, 2022. "The “C” in crowdfunding is for co-financing: exploring participative co-financing, a complement of novel and traditional bank financing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(9), pages 1559-1602, November.
    6. Peter Konhäusner & Marius Thielmann & Veronica Câmpian & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2021. "Crowdfunding for Independent Print Media: E-Commerce, Marketing, and Business Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Alsagr, Naif & Cumming, Douglas J. & Davis, Justin G. & Sewaid, Ahmed, 2023. "Geopolitical risk and crowdfunding performance," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    8. Andrea Rey-Martí & Antonia Mohedano-Suanes & Virginia Simón-Moya, 2019. "Crowdfunding and Social Entrepreneurship: Spotlight on Intermediaries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Bollaert, Helen & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Schwienbacher, Armin, 2021. "Fintech and access to finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Bi, Sheng & Liu, Zhiying & Usman, Khalid, 2017. "The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 10-18.
    11. Tran Thi Thanh Tu & Dinh Phuong Anh & Tang Thi Ha Thu, 2018. "Exploring Factors Influencing the Success of Crowdfunding Campaigns of Startups in Vietnam," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Raouf Jaziri & Mohammad Miralam, 2019. "Modelling the crowdfunding technology adoption among novice entrepreneurs: an extended tam model," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 2159-2179, June.
    13. Tuo Gladys & Yi Feng & Sarpong Solomon & Wang Wenxin, 2020. "The Second Round Resource Acquisition of Entrepreneurial Crowdfunded Ventures: The Relevance of Campaign and Project Implementation Performance Outcomes," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    15. Xin Tang & Haibing Lu & Wei Huang & Shulin Liu, 2023. "Investment decisions and pricing strategies of crowdfunding players: In a two-sided crowdfunding market," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1209-1240, June.
    16. Douglas Cumming & Robert S. Reardon, 2023. "COVID-19 and entrepreneurial processes in US equity crowdfunding," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(5), pages 2326-2349, September.
    17. Swati Gupta & Sahil Raj & Sanjay Gupta & Ajay Sharma, 2023. "Prioritising crowdfunding benefits: a fuzzy-AHP approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 379-403, February.
    18. Elisa Ughetto & Marc Cowling & Neil Lee, 2019. "Regional and spatial issues in the financing of small and medium-sized enterprises and new ventures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 617-619, May.
    19. Joseph P. Hughes & Julapa Jagtiani & Choon-Geol Moon, 2022. "Consumer lending efficiency: commercial banks versus a fintech lender," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-39, December.
    20. Junjuan Du, 2023. "Rational or Impulsive? Early Backers’ Investment Behavior in Agri-Food Crowdfunding from 4P–4C Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221126511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.