IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i3p21582440221108165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Faculty Members’ Attitudes and Practices: How They Responded to Forced Adoption of Distance Education?

Author

Listed:
  • Merfat Ayesh Alsubaie
  • Layla Nasser Alzarah
  • Fatmah Abdulrahman Alhemly

Abstract

In 2020, the world faced a sudden change and general disruption that included all aspects of life because of the corona virus (COVID-19) pandemic. It has made the whole world adopt general and comprehensive emergency measures that have affected every sector, including health, business, and especially education. In order to continue the education process, educators have responded by adopting distance education. This paper explored the attitudes, practices, and emotions of faculty members in a college of education toward the forced adoption and educational transformation to distance education during the corona pandemic. A coding approach was used to analyze 20 reflective articles, which revealed main themes related to difficulties and challenges. The findings highlight skills and experiences that were gained. Hence, the findings promote that faculty members understand professional practices and behaviors in using distance education as an emergency solution for supporting the education process.

Suggested Citation

  • Merfat Ayesh Alsubaie & Layla Nasser Alzarah & Fatmah Abdulrahman Alhemly, 2022. "Faculty Members’ Attitudes and Practices: How They Responded to Forced Adoption of Distance Education?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221108165
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221108165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221108165
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221108165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lytras, Miltiadis D. & Visvizi, Anna & Chopdar, Prasanta Kr & Sarirete, Akila & Alhalabi, Wadee, 2021. "Information Management in Smart Cities: Turning end users’ views into multi-item scale development, validation, and policy-making recommendations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    2. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    3. Meuter, Matthew L. & Ostrom, Amy L. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Roundtree, Robert, 2003. "The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 899-906, November.
    4. Ha, Sejin & Stoel, Leslie, 2009. "Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 565-571, May.
    5. Luca Mora & Roberto Bolici & Mark Deakin, 2017. "The First Two Decades of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 3-27, January.
    6. Christoph Augner & Gerhard Hacker, 2012. "Associations between problematic mobile phone use and psychological parameters in young adults," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(2), pages 437-441, April.
    7. Weiqing Wang & Kunliang Xu & Hongli Niu & Xiangrong Miao, 2020. "Emotion Recognition of Students Based on Facial Expressions in Online Education Based on the Perspective of Computer Simulation," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-9, September.
    8. Anna Wnuk & Tomasz Oleksy & Dominika Maison, 2020. "The acceptance of Covid-19 tracking technologies: The role of perceived threat, lack of control, and ideological beliefs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Hasnan Baber, 2020. "Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcome and Satisfaction in Online Learning during the Pandemic of COVID19," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 7(3), pages 285-292.
    10. Al Lily, Abdulrahman Essa & Ismail, Abdelrahim Fathy & Abunasser, Fathi Mohammed & Alhajhoj Alqahtani, Rafdan Hassan, 2020. "Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garaus, Marion & Wolfsteiner, Elisabeth & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Shoppers' acceptance and perceptions of electronic shelf labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3687-3692.
    2. Julian M. Müller, 2019. "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing—A Study across Europe, China, and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Roberto P. Q. Falcao & J. B. Ferreira & Murilo Carrazedo Marques da Costa Filho, 2019. "The influence of ubiquitous connectivity, trust, personality and generational effects on mobile tourism purchases," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 483-514, December.
    4. Iaia, Lea & Leonelli, Simona & Masciarelli, Francesca & Christofi, Michael & Cooper, Sir Cary, 2022. "The malevolent side of masstige consumers’ behavior: The role of dark triad and technology propensity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 954-966.
    5. Kerstin Pezoldt & Jana Schliewe, 2012. "Akzeptanz von Self-Service-Technologien: State of the Art," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 205-253, March.
    6. Hye Jin Sung & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2020. "Untact: Customer’s Acceptance Intention toward Robot Barista in Coffee Shop," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Wang, Weihua & Zhang, Yuting & Zhao, Junjie, 2023. "Technological or social? Influencing factors and mechanisms of the psychological digital divide in rural Chinese elderly," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Tony Woodall & Julie Rosborough & John Harvey, 2018. "Proposal, project, practice, pause: Developing a framework for evaluating smart domestic product engagement," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(1), pages 58-74, June.
    9. Bravo-Adasme, Natalia & Cataldo, Alejandro, 2022. "Understanding techno-distress and its influence on educational communities: A two-wave study with multiple data samples," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Wajeeha Aslam & Iviane Ramos de Luna & Muhammad Asim & Kashif Farhat, 2023. "Do the Preceding Self-service Technologies Influence Mobile Banking Adoption?," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(1), pages 50-66, January.
    11. Saeideh Sharifi fard & Ezhar Tamam & Md Salleh Hj Hassan & Moniza Waheed & Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, 2016. "Factors affecting Malaysian university students’ purchase intention in social networking sites," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1182612-118, December.
    12. Liang Xiao & Linyong Luo & Tongping Ke, 2024. "The influence of eWOM information structures on consumers’ purchase intentions," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1713-1735, September.
    13. Filimonau, Viachaslau & Högström, Michaela, 2017. "The attitudes of UK tourists to the use of biofuels in civil aviation: An exploratory study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 84-94.
    14. Talukder, Md. Shamim & Sorwar, Golam & Bao, Yukun & Ahmed, Jashim Uddin & Palash, Md. Abu Saeed, 2020. "Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. René Riedl & Harald Kindermann & Andreas Auinger & Andrija Javor, 2012. "Technostress from a Neurobiological Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(2), pages 61-69, April.
    16. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Martins, José & Costa, Catarina & Oliveira, Tiago & Gonçalves, Ramiro & Branco, Frederico, 2019. "How smartphone advertising influences consumers' purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 378-387.
    18. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    19. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    20. Woo Jin Lee & Inho Hwang, 2021. "Sustainable Information Security Behavior Management: An Empirical Approach for the Causes of Employees’ Voice Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221108165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.