IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/iimkoz/v12y2023i1p50-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do the Preceding Self-service Technologies Influence Mobile Banking Adoption?

Author

Listed:
  • Wajeeha Aslam
  • Iviane Ramos de Luna
  • Muhammad Asim
  • Kashif Farhat

Abstract

The study aims to identify the role of preceding self-service technologies (SSTs) in the adoption of mobile banking (m-banking). More specifically, the study examines the impact of attitude (AT), perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) of online banking (o-banking) and ATM in the adoption of m-banking. By using the non-probability purposive sampling technique, the data was gathered through a structured questionnaire from the non-users of m-banking. The partial least square-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique was employed on 257 useful responses to assess the hypotheses. The findings provided evidence that the AT towards ATMs and o-banking significantly affects the AT towards m-banking (ATMB). Moreover, the PEOU of ATM and o-banking significantly affects the PEOU of m-banking. However, in the case of PU, only the usefulness of o-banking affects the usefulness of m-banking. The results also reveal that the AT, PEOU and PU of m-banking affect the intention to adopt m-banking (IMB). The study benefits the banking industry as it provides insights on how banks can use their preceding SSTs in developing a consumer’s intention to use m-banking. This is one of the early studies that considers the effect of PEOU and PU of previous SSTs on the adoption of m-banking. The multi-channel perspective, that is, ATMs and o-banking in the adoption of m-banking, also offers additional valuable insights and contributes to the literature of technology adoption. In the past, studies have not focused on the spillover effects of preceding SSTs. However, mature channels could be used in boosting a new channel.

Suggested Citation

  • Wajeeha Aslam & Iviane Ramos de Luna & Muhammad Asim & Kashif Farhat, 2023. "Do the Preceding Self-service Technologies Influence Mobile Banking Adoption?," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(1), pages 50-66, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:50-66
    DOI: 10.1177/22779752211073552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22779752211073552
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22779752211073552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Woosnam, Kyle M. & Draper, Jason & Jiang, Jingxian (Kelly) & Aleshinloye, Kayode D. & Erul, Emrullah, 2018. "Applying self-perception theory to explain residents' attitudes about tourism development through travel histories," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 357-368.
    2. Merhi, Mohamed & Hone, Kate & Tarhini, Ali, 2019. "A cross-cultural study of the intention to use mobile banking between Lebanese and British consumers: Extending UTAUT2 with security, privacy and trust," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. repec:eme:mrn000:01409170610645402 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ha, Sejin & Stoel, Leslie, 2009. "Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 565-571, May.
    5. Wajeeha Aslam & Ayesha Tariq & Imtiaz Arif, 2019. "The Effect of ATM Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty: An Empirical Analysis," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1155-1178, October.
    6. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    7. Arif, Imtiaz & Aslam, Wajeeha & Hwang, Yujong, 2020. "Barriers in adoption of internet banking: A structural equation modeling - Neural network approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    9. Alireza Pooya & Mehran Abed Khorasani & Simin Gholamian Ghouzhdi, 2020. "Investigating the effect of perceived quality of self-service banking on customer satisfaction," International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 263-280, January.
    10. Katherine J. Stewart, 2003. "Trust Transfer on the World Wide Web," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 5-17, February.
    11. Ho, Jonathan C. & Wu, Chorng-Guang & Lee, Chung-Shing & Pham, Thanh-Thao T., 2020. "Factors affecting the behavioral intention to adopt mobile banking: An international comparison," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Meuter, Matthew L. & Ostrom, Amy L. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Roundtree, Robert, 2003. "The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 899-906, November.
    13. Muk, Alexander & Chung, Christina, 2015. "Applying the technology acceptance model in a two-country study of SMS advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 1-6.
    14. Kieran Mathieson, 1991. "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 173-191, September.
    15. Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Rana, Nripendra P., 2017. "Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 99-110.
    16. Malaquias, Rodrigo Fernandes & Silva, Altieres Frances, 2020. "Understanding the use of mobile banking in rural areas of Brazil," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    17. Wajeeha Aslam & Marija Ham & Imtiaz Arif, 2017. "Consumer Behavioral Intentions towards Mobile Payment Services: An Empirical Analysis in Pakistan," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(2), pages 161-176.
    18. Lin, Hsiu-Fen, 2011. "An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: The effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 252-260.
    19. Sung S. Kim & Naresh K. Malhotra, 2005. "A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 741-755, May.
    20. James Agyei & Shaorong Sun & Eugene Abrokwah & Emmanuel Kofi Penney & Richmond Ofori-Boafo, 2020. "Mobile Banking Adoption: Examining the Role of Personality Traits," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    21. Mohammad Hamdi Al Khasawneh & Rand Irshaidat, 2017. "Empirical validation of the decomposed theory of planned behaviour model within the mobile banking adoption context," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 58-76.
    22. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    23. Sujeet Kumar Sharma, 2019. "Integrating cognitive antecedents into TAM to explain mobile banking behavioral intention: A SEM-neural network modeling," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 815-827, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raghavendra Prasanna Kumar & Arindam Banerjee & Zahran Al-Salti & S. Ananda, 2024. "Technology acceptance model and customer engagement: mediating role of customer satisfaction," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1062-1076, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashraf Hilal & Concepción Varela-Neira, 2022. "Understanding Consumer Adoption of Mobile Banking: Extending the UTAUT2 Model with Proactive Personality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Garaus, Marion & Wolfsteiner, Elisabeth & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Shoppers' acceptance and perceptions of electronic shelf labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3687-3692.
    3. Simarpreet Kaur & Sangeeta Arora, 2023. "Understanding customers’ usage behavior towards online banking services: an integrated risk–benefit framework," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 74-98, March.
    4. Jadil, Yassine & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model in the mobile banking literature: The moderating role of sample size and culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 354-372.
    5. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    6. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    7. Müller-Seitz, Gordon & Dautzenberg, Kirsti & Creusen, Utho & Stromereder, Christine, 2009. "Customer acceptance of RFID technology: Evidence from the German electronic retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 31-39.
    8. Yoon, Jeewhan & Vonortas, Nicholas S. & Han, SungWon, 2020. "Do-It-Yourself laboratories and attitude toward use: The effects of self-efficacy and the perception of security and privacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Donglin Han & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Hao Wu & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Modelling Tourists’ Acceptance of Hotel Experience-Enhancement Smart Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Kerstin Pezoldt & Jana Schliewe, 2012. "Akzeptanz von Self-Service-Technologien: State of the Art," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 205-253, March.
    11. Elodie Attié & Lars Meyer-Waarden, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Post-Print hal-04065165, HAL.
    12. Mohammed Afzal & Mohd. Shamim Ansari & Naseem Ahmad & Mohammad Shahid & Mohd. Shoeb, 2024. "Cyberfraud, usage intention, and cybersecurity awareness among e-banking users in India: an integrated model approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 1503-1523, December.
    13. Nan Zhang & Xunhua Guo & Guoqing Chen, 2011. "Why adoption and use behavior of IT/IS cannot last?—two studies in China," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 381-395, July.
    14. Nguyen Thi Tuyet Mai & Takahashi Yoshi & Nham Phong Tuan, 2013. "Technology acceptance model and the paths to online customer loyalty in an emerging market," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 25(2), pages 231-248.
    15. Nedra, Bahri-Ammari & Hadhri, Walid & Mezrani, Mariem, 2019. "Determinants of customers' intentions to use hedonic networks: The case of Instagram," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 21-32.
    16. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    17. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:1018-1046 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Zeleke Siraye Asnakew, 2020. "Customers’ Continuance Intention to Use Mobile Banking: Development and Testing of an Integrated Model," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 123-146, April.
    19. Julian M. Müller, 2019. "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing—A Study across Europe, China, and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    21. Baier, Daniel & Stüber, Eva, 2010. "Acceptance of recommendations to buy in online retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 173-180.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:50-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.