Protecting Farmers and Workers in Socialist Market Transitions: Mass Attitudes Toward Imports in Asia
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1177/21582440221099296
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Mayda, Anna Maria & Rodrik, Dani, 2005.
"Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 1393-1430, August.
- Anna Maria Mayda & Dani Rodrik, 2001. "Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?," NBER Working Papers 8461, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Anna Maria Mayda (Georgetown University) and Dani Rodrik (Harvard University), 2005. "Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?," Working Papers gueconwpa~05-05-11, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.
- Rodrik, Dani & Mayda, Anna Maria, 2001. "Why are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?," CEPR Discussion Papers 2960, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Mansfield, Edward D. & Mutz, Diana C., 2009. "Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 425-457, July.
- Hal Hill & Jayant Menon, 2014.
"Cambodia: Rapid Growth in an Open, Post-conflict Economy,"
The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(12), pages 1649-1668, December.
- Hal Hill & Jayant Menon, 2014. "Cambodia: Rapid Growth in an Open, Post-Conflict Economy," Departmental Working Papers 2014-12, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
- Scheve, Kenneth F. & Slaughter, Matthew J., 2001. "What determines individual trade-policy preferences?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 267-292, August.
- Dani Rodrik, 1998.
"Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(5), pages 997-1032, October.
- Rodrik, Dani, 1996. "Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?," CEPR Discussion Papers 1388, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Dani Rodrik, 1996. "Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?," NBER Working Papers 5537, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Richard Williams, 2006. "Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 6(1), pages 58-82, March.
- Petrik Runst, 2014. "Popular Attitudes Toward Market Economic Principles and Institutional Reform in Transition Economies," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 83-115, March.
- Hays, Jude C. & Ehrlich, Sean D. & Peinhardt, Clint, 2005. "Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(2), pages 473-494, April.
- Naoi, Megumi & Kume, Ikuo, 2011. "Explaining Mass Support for Agricultural Protectionism: Evidence from a Survey Experiment During the Global Recession," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(4), pages 771-795, October.
- Adserà, Alícia & Boix, Carles, 2002. "Trade, Democracy, and the Size of the Public Sector: The Political Underpinnings of Openness," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(2), pages 229-262, April.
- Hetherington, Marc J., 1998. "The Political Relevance of Political Trust," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 92(4), pages 791-808, December.
- Bruce A., Blonigen, 2011. "Revisiting the evidence on trade policy preferences," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 129-135, September.
- James R. Kluegel & David S. Mason, 2004. "Fairness matters: social justice and political legitimacy in post‐communist Europe," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(6), pages 813-834.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Jäkel, Ina C. & Smolka, Marcel, 2017. "Trade policy preferences and factor abundance," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-19.
- Rickard, Stephanie, 2022. "Economic geography, politics, and the world trade regime," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113857, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Philipp Harms & Nils D. Steiner, 2023. "Attitudes towards Globalization: A Survey," Working Papers 2305, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
- Schaffer, Lena Maria & Spilker, Gabriele, 2013. "Adding Another Level: Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies," Papers 551, World Trade Institute.
- Gabriel Felbermayr & Toshihiro Okubo, 2022.
"Individual preferences on trade liberalization: evidence from a Japanese household survey,"
Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(1), pages 305-330, February.
- Gabriel Felbermayr & Toshihiro Okubo, 2020. "Individual Preferences on Trade Liberalization: Evidence from a Japanese Household Survey," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2020-010, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
- Eiichi Tomiura & Banri Ito & Hiroshi Mukunoki & Ryuhei Wakasugi, 2016. "Individual Characteristics, Behavioral Biases, and Trade Policy Preferences: Evidence from a Survey in Japan," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 1081-1095, November.
- Federico Podestà, 2016. "Do Big Governments Promote Trade Liberalization? A Long-Term Analysis of 18 OECD Countries, 1975-2000," FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers 2016-02, Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies (IRVAPP), Bruno Kessler Foundation.
- Ito, Banri & Tanaka, Ayumu & Jinji, Naoto, 2023.
"Why do people oppose foreign acquisitions? Evidence from Japanese individual-level data,"
Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
- ITO Banri & TANAKA Ayumu & JINJI Naoto, 2022. "Why Do People Oppose Foreign Acquisitions? Evidence from Japanese Individual-Level Data," Discussion papers 22002, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
- Aleksandra Sojka & Jorge Diaz-Lanchas & Federico Steinberg, 2019.
"The Politicization of Transatlantic Trade in Europe: Explaining Inconsistent Preferences Regarding Free Trade and the TTIP,"
JRC Working Papers on Territorial Modelling and Analysis
2019-09, Joint Research Centre.
- Aleksandra Sojka & Jorge Díaz-Lanchas & Frederico Steinberg, 2020. "'The politicisation of transatlantic trade in Europe: Explaining inconsistent preferences regarding free trade and the TTIP," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 151, European Institute, LSE.
- Ida Bastiaens & Evgeny Postnikov, 2020. "Social standards in trade agreements and free trade preferences: An empirical investigation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 793-816, October.
- Nils D. Steiner & Philipp Harms, 2020. "Local Trade Shocks and the Nationalist Backlash in Political Attitudes: Panel Data Evidence from Great Britain," Working Papers 2014, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
- Ina Jäkel & Marcel Smolka, 2013.
"Individual Attitudes Towards Trade: Stolper-Samuelson Revisited,"
Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 731-761, September.
- Jäkel, Ina C. & Smolka, Marcel, 2011. "Individual attitudes towards trade: Stolper-Samuelson revisited," University of Tübingen Working Papers in Business and Economics 11, University of Tuebingen, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, School of Business and Economics.
- Anna Maria Mayda & Kevin H. O'Rourke & Richard Sinnott, 2007.
"Risk, Government and Globalization: International Survey Evidence,"
NBER Working Papers
13037, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- O'Rourke, Kevin & Mayda, Anna Maria & Sinnott, Richard, 2007. "Risk, Government and Globalization: International Survey Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 6354, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Anna Maria Mayda & Kevin H. O'Rourke & Richard Sinnott, 2007. "Risk, Government and Globalization: International Survey Evidence," Trinity Economics Papers tep0507, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
- Anna Maria Mayda & Kevin H. O'Rourke, 2007. "Risk, Government andd Globalization: International Survey Evidence," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp218, IIIS.
- Ehrlich Sean D, 2010. "Who Supports Compensation? Individual Preferences for Trade-Related Unemployment Insurance," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, April.
- Nils D Steiner, 2018. "Attitudes towards the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership in the European Union: The treaty partner heuristic and issue attention," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(2), pages 255-277, June.
- Rodríguez Chatruc, Marisol & Stein, Ernesto H. & Vlaicu, Razvan, 2019. "Trade Attitudes in Latin America: Evidence from a Multi-Country Survey Experiment," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9603, Inter-American Development Bank.
- Harms, Philipp & Steiner, Nils, 2019. "The China Shock and the Nationalist Backlash against Globalization: Attitudinal Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203506, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Rodríguez Chatruc, Marisol & Stein, Ernesto & Vlaicu, Razvan, 2021. "How issue framing shapes trade attitudes: Evidence from a multi-country survey experiment," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
- Lan, Xiaohuan & Li, Ben, 2011. "Nationalism and international trade: theory and evidence," MPRA Paper 36412, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 03 Feb 2012.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Max F. Steinhardt & Maurizio Zanardi, 2020.
"The political economy of trade and migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress,"
Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 250-278, July.
- Zanardi, Maurizio & Facchini, Giovanni & Conconi, Paola & Steinhardt, Max, 2012. "The political economy of trade and migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress," CEPR Discussion Papers 9270, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Steinhardt, Max & Conconi, Paola & Facchini, Giovanni & Zanardi, Maurizio, 2013. "The political economy of trade and migration:Evidence from the U.S. Congress," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79961, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Maurizio Zanardi, 2020. "The Political Economy of Trade and Migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/318670, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Conconi, Paola & Facchini, Giovanni & Steinhardt, Max F. & Zanardi, Maurizio, 2018. "The political economy of trade and migration: evidence from the U.S. Congress," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91685, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Max F. Steinhardt & Maurizio Zanardi, 2018. "The political economy of trade and migration: evidence from the US Congress," CEP Discussion Papers dp1564, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Max F. Steinhardt & Maurizio Zanardi, 2012. "The political economy of trade and migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress," Norface Discussion Paper Series 2012031, Norface Research Programme on Migration, Department of Economics, University College London.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Max F. Steinhardt & Maurizio Zanardi, 2012. "The Political Economy of Trade and Migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress," Development Working Papers 346, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano, revised 13 Nov 2012.
- Conconi, Paola & Facchini, Giovanni & Steinhardt, Max Friedrich & Zanardi, Maurizio, 2012. "The political economy of trade and migration: Evidence from the US Congress," HWWI Research Papers 136, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
More about this item
Keywords
imports; trade preferences; protectionism; collectivism; political trust;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221099296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.