IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i2p201-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimal path set importance in complex systems

Author

Listed:
  • Sudhanshu Aggarwal

Abstract

To find the best mode for system design in reliability optimization, risk engineers around the world use the importance measure as a basic tool. This paper introduces a new importance measure taking into account minimal path sets of the system. It helps to optimize the system designs that occur in many situations. For instance, this importance measure can be used (a) in identifying important components of any complex system and (b) solving constrained redundancy optimization problems. This is illustrated by providing two heuristic algorithms. In the first algorithm, this measure is used to find important components of any complex system ensuring improved system reliability. The second algorithm is used to solve a constrained redundancy optimization problem for any general coherent system giving (near) optimal solutions in 1-neighborhood. The results show that the new importance measure is easily applicable, unlike the classical ones. Hence, it serves as a very useful tool in measuring the important component(s) and solving constrained redundancy optimization problems of complex systems. Thus, it can be considered as a good alternative to the existing importance measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Sudhanshu Aggarwal, 2021. "Minimal path set importance in complex systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 201-208, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:2:p:201-208
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20962668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20962668
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20962668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2011. "Importance measures in risk-informed decision making: Ranking, optimisation and configuration control," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1426-1436.
    2. Michele Compare & Michele Bellora & Enrico Zio, 2017. "Aggregation of importance measures for decision making in reliability engineering," Post-Print hal-01652234, HAL.
    3. Aliee, Hananeh & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2017. "On the Boolean extension of the Birnbaum importance to non-coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 191-200.
    4. Borgonovo, E., 2007. "Differential, criticality and Birnbaum importance measures: An application to basic event, groups and SSCs in event trees and binary decision diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(10), pages 1458-1467.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu, Yuqiang & Yuan, Tao & Zhu, Xiaoyan, 2019. "Importance-measure based methods for component reassignment problem of degrading components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Wu, Shaomin & Chen, Yi & Wu, Qingtai & Wang, Zhonglai, 2016. "Linking component importance to optimisation of preventive maintenance policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 26-32.
    3. Aliee, Hananeh & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2017. "On the Boolean extension of the Birnbaum importance to non-coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 191-200.
    4. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Sedlacek, Peter & Kvassay, Miroslav & Rabcan, Jan, 2021. "Logical differential calculus for calculation of Birnbaum importance of non-coherent system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Xianzhen Huang & Frank PA Coolen, 2018. "Reliability sensitivity analysis of coherent systems based on survival signature," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 627-634, December.
    6. Dui, Hongyan & Wu, Shaomin & Zhao, Jiangbin, 2021. "Some extensions of the component maintenance priority," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Xiaoyan Zhu & Way Kuo, 2014. "Importance measures in reliability and mathematical programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 241-267, January.
    8. Rogerson, Ellen C. & Lambert, James H., 2012. "Prioritizing risks via several expert perspectives with application to runway safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 22-34.
    9. Lyu, Dong & Si, Shubin, 2021. "Importance measure for K-out-of-n: G systems under dynamic random load considering strength degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2016. "Importances of components and events in non-coherent systems and risk models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-122.
    11. Darwish, Molham & Almouahed, Shaban & de Lamotte, Florent, 2017. "The integration of expert-defined importance factors to enrich Bayesian Fault Tree Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 81-90.
    12. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Chen, Zhiqiang & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2021. "Remaining-useful-lifetime and system-remaining-profit based importance measures for decisions on preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    13. Shumin Li & Shubin Si & Liudong Xing & Shudong Sun, 2014. "Integrated importance of multi-state fault tree based on multi-state multi-valued decision diagram," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(2), pages 200-208, April.
    14. Emanuele Borgonovo & Alessandra Cillo & Curtis L. Smith, 2018. "On the Relationship between Safety and Decision Significance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(8), pages 1541-1558, August.
    15. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    16. Lu, Zhenzhou & Xinyao Li,, 2018. "Failure-mode importance measures in structural system with multiple failure modes and its estimation using copulaAuthor-Name: He, Liangli," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 53-59.
    17. Dui, Hongyan & Si, Shubin & Wu, Shaomin & Yam, Richard C.M., 2017. "An importance measure for multistate systems with external factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 49-57.
    18. Mo, Yuchang & Xing, Liudong & Cui, Lirong & Si, Shubin, 2017. "MDD-based performability analysis of multi-state linear consecutive-k-out-of-n: F systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 124-131.
    19. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2008. "Epistemic Uncertainty in the Ranking and Categorization of Probabilistic Safety Assessment Model Elements: Issues and Findings," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 983-1001, August.
    20. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2010. "Ideas and developments in importance measures and fault-tree techniques for reliability and risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 99-107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:2:p:201-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.