IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v232y2018i6p627-634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability sensitivity analysis of coherent systems based on survival signature

Author

Listed:
  • Xianzhen Huang
  • Frank PA Coolen

Abstract

The reliability sensitivity can be used to rank distribution parameters of system components concerning their impacts on the system’s reliability. Such information is essential to purposes such as component prioritization, reliability improvement, and risk reduction of a system. In this article, we present an efficient method for reliability sensitivity analysis of coherent systems using survival signature. The survival signature is applied to calculate the reliability of coherent systems. The reliability importance of components is derived analytically to evaluate the relative importance of the component with respect to the overall reliability of the system. The closed-form formula for the reliability sensitivity of the system with respect to component’s distribution parameters is derived from the derivative of lifetime distribution of a component to further investigate the impacts of the distribution parameters on the system’s reliability. The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed approaches are demonstrated with two numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianzhen Huang & Frank PA Coolen, 2018. "Reliability sensitivity analysis of coherent systems based on survival signature," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 627-634, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:6:p:627-634
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18754974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18754974
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18754974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2017. "Value of Information," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Sensitivity Analysis, chapter 0, pages 93-100, Springer.
    2. Reed, Sean, 2017. "An efficient algorithm for exact computation of system and survival signatures using binary decision diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 257-267.
    3. Lisnianski, Anatoly & Frenkel, Ilia & Khvatskin, Lev, 2015. "On Birnbaum importance assessment for aging multi-state system under minimal repair by using the Lz-transform method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 258-266.
    4. Dui, Hongyan & Si, Shubin & Yam, Richard C.M., 2017. "A cost-based integrated importance measure of system components for preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 98-104.
    5. Feng, Geng & Patelli, Edoardo & Beer, Michael & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2016. "Imprecise system reliability and component importance based on survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 116-125.
    6. Francisco J. Samaniego, 2007. "System Signatures and their Applications in Engineering Reliability," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-71797-5, December.
    7. Aven, T. & Nøkland, T.E., 2010. "On the use of uncertainty importance measures in reliability and risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 127-133.
    8. Natvig, Bent & Eide, Kristina A. & Gåsemyr, Jørund & Huseby, Arne B. & Isaksen, Stefan L., 2009. "Simulation based analysis and an application to an offshore oil and gas production system of the Natvig measures of component importance in repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1629-1638.
    9. Michele Compare & Michele Bellora & Enrico Zio, 2017. "Aggregation of importance measures for decision making in reliability engineering," Post-Print hal-01652234, HAL.
    10. Vaurio, Jussi K., 2016. "Importances of components and events in non-coherent systems and risk models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-122.
    11. Aliee, Hananeh & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2017. "On the Boolean extension of the Birnbaum importance to non-coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 191-200.
    12. Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2016. "The structure function for system reliability as predictive (imprecise) probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 180-187.
    13. Dutuit, Yves & Rauzy, Antoine, 2015. "On the extension of Importance Measures to complex components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 161-168.
    14. Emanuele Borgonovo & Alessandra Cillo, 2017. "Deciding with Thresholds: Importance Measures and Value of Information," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1828-1848, October.
    15. Kvassay, Miroslav & Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly, 2017. "Importance analysis of multi-state systems based on tools of logical differential calculus," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 302-316.
    16. Wu, Shaomin & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2013. "A cost-based importance measure for system components: An extension of the Birnbaum importance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 189-195.
    17. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Aliee, Hananeh & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2016. "A new time-independent reliability importance measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 427-442.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Xianzhen & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2019. "A heuristic survival signature based approach for reliability-redundancy allocation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 511-517.
    2. Huang, Xianzhen & Jin, Sujun & He, Xuefeng & He, David, 2019. "Reliability analysis of coherent systems subject to internal failures and external shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 75-83.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Chen, Zhiqiang & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2021. "Remaining-useful-lifetime and system-remaining-profit based importance measures for decisions on preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Dui, Hongyan & Wu, Shaomin & Zhao, Jiangbin, 2021. "Some extensions of the component maintenance priority," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2018. "Marginal and joint reliability importance based on survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 118-128.
    4. Salomon, Julian & Winnewisser, Niklas & Wei, Pengfei & Broggi, Matteo & Beer, Michael, 2021. "Efficient reliability analysis of complex systems in consideration of imprecision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Patelli, Edoardo & Feng, Geng & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2017. "Simulation methods for system reliability using the survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 327-337.
    6. Coolen-Maturi, Tahani & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy, 2021. "The joint survival signature of coherent systems with shared components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    7. Hindolo George-Williams & Geng Feng & Frank PA Coolen & Michael Beer & Edoardo Patelli, 2019. "Extending the survival signature paradigm to complex systems with non-repairable dependent failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 505-519, August.
    8. Lyu, Dong & Si, Shubin, 2021. "Importance measure for K-out-of-n: G systems under dynamic random load considering strength degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    10. Dui, Hongyan & Li, Shumin & Xing, Liudong & Liu, Hanlin, 2019. "System performance-based joint importance analysis guided maintenance for repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 162-175.
    11. Dui, Hongyan & Si, Shubin & Wu, Shaomin & Yam, Richard C.M., 2017. "An importance measure for multistate systems with external factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 49-57.
    12. Aliee, Hananeh & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2017. "On the Boolean extension of the Birnbaum importance to non-coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 191-200.
    13. Roy Cerqueti, 2022. "A new concept of reliability system and applications in finance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 45-64, May.
    14. Zhao, Jiangbin & Si, Shubin & Cai, Zhiqiang & Guo, Peng & Zhu, Wenjin, 2020. "Mission success probability optimization for phased-mission systems with repairable component modules," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Vaisman, Radislav & Sun, Yuting, 2021. "Reliability and importance measure analysis of networks with shared risk link groups," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    16. Sedlacek, Peter & Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kvassay, Miroslav, 2021. "Critical state of non-coherent multi-state system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    17. Serkan Eryilmaz & Frank P.A. Coolen & Tahani Coolen‐Maturi, 2018. "Mean residual life of coherent systems consisting of multiple types of dependent components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 86-97, February.
    18. Lyu, Dong & Si, Shubin, 2020. "Dynamic importance measure for the K-out-of-n: G system under repeated random load," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Dui, Hongyan & Si, Shubin & Yam, Richard C.M., 2017. "A cost-based integrated importance measure of system components for preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 98-104.
    20. Do, Phuc & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2020. "Conditional reliability-based importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:6:p:627-634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.