IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v234y2020i1p151-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel deep capsule neural network for remaining useful life estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Ruiz-Tagle Palazuelos
  • Enrique López Droguett
  • Rodrigo Pascual

Abstract

With the availability of cheaper multi-sensor systems, one has access to massive and multi-dimensional sensor data for fault diagnostics and prognostics. However, from a time, engineering and computational perspective, it is often cost prohibitive to manually extract useful features and to label all the data. To address these challenges, deep learning techniques have been used in the recent years. Within these, convolutional neural networks have shown remarkable performance in fault diagnostics and prognostics. However, this model present limitations from a prognostics and health management perspective: to improve its feature extraction generalization capabilities and reduce computation time, ill-based pooling operations are employed, which require sub-sampling of the data, thus loosing potentially valuable information regarding an asset’s degradation process. Capsule neural networks have been recently proposed to address these problems with strong results in computer vision–related classification tasks. This has motivated us to extend capsule neural networks for fault prognostics and, in particular, remaining useful life estimation. The proposed model, architecture and algorithm are tested and compared to other state-of-the art deep learning models on the benchmark Commercial Modular Aero Propulsion System Simulation turbofans data set. The results indicate that the proposed capsule neural networks are a promising approach for remaining useful life prognostics from multi-dimensional sensor data.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Ruiz-Tagle Palazuelos & Enrique López Droguett & Rodrigo Pascual, 2020. "A novel deep capsule neural network for remaining useful life estimation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(1), pages 151-167, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:234:y:2020:i:1:p:151-167
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X19866546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X19866546
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X19866546?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fink, Olga & Zio, Enrico & Weidmann, Ulrich, 2014. "Predicting component reliability and level of degradation with complex-valued neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 198-206.
    2. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Zio, Enrico & Lins, Isis Didier & Droguett, Enrique, 2011. "Failure and reliability prediction by support vector machines regression of time series data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1527-1534.
    3. Li, Xiang & Ding, Qian & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2018. "Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Satoru Kondo & Takashi Yoshida & Kenichi Ohki, 2016. "Mixed functional microarchitectures for orientation selectivity in the mouse primary visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moradi, Ramin & Groth, Katrina M., 2020. "Modernizing risk assessment: A systematic integration of PRA and PHM techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. de Pater, Ingeborg & Reijns, Arthur & Mitici, Mihaela, 2022. "Alarm-based predictive maintenance scheduling for aircraft engines with imperfect Remaining Useful Life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Rabcan, Jan, 2023. "A new method for analysis of Multi-State systems based on Multi-valued decision diagram under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Arias Chao, Manuel & Kulkarni, Chetan & Goebel, Kai & Fink, Olga, 2022. "Fusing physics-based and deep learning models for prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Zhang, Wei & Li, Xiang & Ma, Hui & Luo, Zhong & Li, Xu, 2021. "Transfer learning using deep representation regularization in remaining useful life prediction across operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    3. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    4. Li, Zhanhang & Zhou, Jian & Nassif, Hani & Coit, David & Bae, Jinwoo, 2023. "Fusing physics-inferred information from stochastic model with machine learning approaches for degradation prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    5. Lin, Yan-Hui & Chang, Liang & Guan, Lu-Xin, 2024. "Enhanced stochastic recurrent hybrid model for RUL Predictions via Semi-supervised learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    6. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    7. Roy, Atin & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2022. "Reliability analysis of structures by a three-stage sequential sampling based adaptive support vector regression model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yifan & Shao, Haonan & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "A novel dual attention mechanism combined with knowledge for remaining useful life prediction based on gated recurrent units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    9. Han Chin Wang & Amy M. LeMessurier & Daniel E. Feldman, 2022. "Tuning instability of non-columnar neurons in the salt-and-pepper whisker map in somatosensory cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yao & Hu, Zhenchao & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine enabled by fusing knowledge and deep learning models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    11. Li, Xiang & Ding, Qian & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2018. "Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-11.
    12. Zhuang, Jichao & Jia, Minping & Ding, Yifei & Ding, Peng, 2021. "Temporal convolution-based transferable cross-domain adaptation approach for remaining useful life estimation under variable failure behaviors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    13. Khaled Akkad & David He, 2023. "A dynamic mode decomposition based deep learning technique for prognostics," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2207-2224, June.
    14. Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2022. "Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Ma, Rui & Yang, Tao & Breaz, Elena & Li, Zhongliang & Briois, Pascal & Gao, Fei, 2018. "Data-driven proton exchange membrane fuel cell degradation predication through deep learning method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 102-115.
    16. Fu, Song & Lin, Lin & Wang, Yue & Guo, Feng & Zhao, Minghang & Zhong, Baihong & Zhong, Shisheng, 2024. "MCA-DTCN: A novel dual-task temporal convolutional network with multi-channel attention for first prediction time detection and remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Xiaojia Wang & Ting Huang & Keyu Zhu & Xibin Zhao, 2022. "LSTM-Based Broad Learning System for Remaining Useful Life Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Khatibinia, Mohsen & Javad Fadaee, Mohammad & Salajegheh, Javad & Salajegheh, Eysa, 2013. "Seismic reliability assessment of RC structures including soil–structure interaction using wavelet weighted least squares support vector machine," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 22-33.
    19. Feiyue Deng & Yan Bi & Yongqiang Liu & Shaopu Yang, 2021. "Deep-Learning-Based Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on a Multi-Scale Dilated Convolution Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Yang Liu & Naiwei Lu & Xinfeng Yin & Mohammad Noori, 2016. "An adaptive support vector regression method for structural system reliability assessment and its application to a cable-stayed bridge," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(2), pages 204-219, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:234:y:2020:i:1:p:151-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.