IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i6p1074-1085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-dependent reliability analysis of wind turbines considering load-sharing using fault tree analysis and Markov chains

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Li
  • Frank PA Coolen

Abstract

Due to the high failure rates and the high cost of operation and maintenance of wind turbines, not only manufacturers but also service providers try many ways to improve the reliability of some critical components and subsystems. In reality, redundancy design is commonly used to improve the reliability of critical components and subsystems. The load dependencies and failure dependencies among redundancy components and subsystems are crucial to the reliability assessment of wind turbines. However, the redundancy components are treated as a parallel system, and the load correlations among them are ignored in much literature, which may lead to the wrong system’s reliability and much higher costs. For this reason, this article explores the influences of load-sharing on system reliability. The whole system’s reliability is quantitatively evaluated using fault tree analysis and the Markov-chain method. Following this, the optimisation of the redundancy allocation problem considering the load-sharing is conducted to maximise the system reliability and reduce the total cost of the system subjecting to the available system cost and space. The results produced by this methodology can show a realistic reliability assessment of the entire wind turbine from a quantitative point of view. The realistic reliability assessment can help to design a cost-effective and more reliable system and significantly reduce the cost of wind turbines.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Li & Frank PA Coolen, 2019. "Time-dependent reliability analysis of wind turbines considering load-sharing using fault tree analysis and Markov chains," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1074-1085, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:6:p:1074-1085
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X19859690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X19859690
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X19859690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Xianzhen & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2019. "A heuristic survival signature based approach for reliability-redundancy allocation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 511-517.
    2. Huang, Xianzhen & Jin, Sujun & He, Xuefeng & He, David, 2019. "Reliability analysis of coherent systems subject to internal failures and external shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 75-83.
    3. Abouei Ardakan, Mostafa & Zeinal Hamadani, Ali, 2014. "Reliability optimization of series–parallel systems with mixed redundancy strategy in subsystems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 132-139.
    4. Zhiyu Jiang & Weifei Hu & Wenbin Dong & Zhen Gao & Zhengru Ren, 2017. "Structural Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Márquez, Fausto Pedro García & Pérez, Jesús María Pinar & Marugán, Alberto Pliego & Papaelias, Mayorkinos, 2016. "Identification of critical components of wind turbines using FTA over the time," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 869-883.
    6. Li, Zhaojun & Liao, Haitao & Coit, David W., 2009. "A two-stage approach for multi-objective decision making with applications to system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1585-1592.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hanxiao & Sun, Muxia & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Reliability–redundancy allocation problem in multi-state flow network: Minimal cut-based approximation scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Zhang, Enze & Chen, Qingwei, 2016. "Multi-objective reliability redundancy allocation in an interval environment using particle swarm optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 83-92.
    3. Hsieh, Tsung-Jung, 2021. "Component mixing with a cold standby strategy for the redundancy allocation problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Han, Zhong & Tian, Liting & Cheng, Lin, 2021. "A deducing-based reliability optimization for electrical equipment with constant failure rate components duration their mission profile," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Laihao Ma & Xiaoxue Ma & Jingwen Zhang & Qing Yang & Kai Wei, 2021. "Identifying the Weaker Function Links in the Hazardous Chemicals Road Transportation System in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Ardakan, Mostafa Abouei & Talkhabi, Sajjad & Juybari, Mohammad N., 2022. "Optimal activation order vs. redundancy strategies in reliability optimization problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    7. Zaretalab, Arash & Sharifi, Mani & Guilani, Pedram Pourkarim & Taghipour, Sharareh & Niaki, Seyed Taghi Akhavan, 2022. "A multi-objective model for optimizing the redundancy allocation, component supplier selection, and reliable activities for multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Ling, Chunyan & Yang, Lechang & Feng, Kaixuan & Kuo, Way, 2023. "Survival signature based robust redundancy allocation under imprecise probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    9. Bon-Yong Koo & Dae-Yi Jung, 2019. "A Comparative Study on Primary Bearing Rating Life of a 5-MW Two-Blade Wind Turbine System Based on Two Different Control Domains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Abdossaber Peiravi & Mahdi Karbasian & Mostafa Abouei Ardakan, 2018. "K-mixed strategy: A new redundancy strategy for reliability problems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 38-51, February.
    11. Xu, Qinqin & Zhu, Yuanguo, 2022. "Reliability modeling of uncertain random fractional differential systems with competitive failures," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    12. Chatwattanasiri, Nida & Coit, David W. & Wattanapongsakorn, Naruemon, 2016. "System redundancy optimization with uncertain stress-based component reliability: Minimization of regret," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 73-83.
    13. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & D’Urso, Diego & Famoso, Fabio & Brusca, Sebastian & Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio & Catterson, Victoria M., 2018. "On the use of dynamic reliability for an accurate modelling of renewable power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 605-621.
    14. Peiravi, Abdossaber & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Zanjani, Masoumeh Kazemi, 2022. "Universal redundancy strategy for system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    15. Gholinezhad, Hadi & Zeinal Hamadani, Ali, 2017. "A new model for the redundancy allocation problem with component mixing and mixed redundancy strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 66-73.
    16. Yuchang Mo & Liudong Xing, 2013. "An enhanced decision diagram-based method for common-cause failure analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(5), pages 557-566, October.
    17. Kuo, Ching-Chang & Ke, Jau-Chuan, 2016. "Comparative analysis of standby systems with unreliable server and switching failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 74-82.
    18. Mellal, Mohamed Arezki & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "System reliability-redundancy optimization with cold-standby strategy by an enhanced nest cuckoo optimization algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    19. Liu, Zhitao & Tan, CherMing & Leng, Feng, 2015. "A reliability-based design concept for lithium-ion battery pack in electric vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 169-177.
    20. Ceferino, Luis & Lin, Ning & Xi, Dazhi, 2023. "Bayesian updating of solar panel fragility curves and implications of higher panel strength for solar generation resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:6:p:1074-1085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.