IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v222y2008i1p39-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of significant transitions in the influencing factors of human reliability

Author

Listed:
  • M Konstandinidou
  • Z Nivolianitou
  • C Kiranoudis
  • N Markatos

Abstract

This paper describes sensitivity analysis of a previously developed model for the estimation of the probability of human erroneous actions in specific industrial and working contexts. The model has been built using the fuzzy logic theory. The fuzzy model developed includes nine input parameters according to the CREAM (cognitive reliability and error analysis method) methodology. The model has been used in order to detect the critical transitions in the optimization of human reliability, for corresponding changes in each of the nine input parameters. Changes in the working context have been evaluated through their relevant reduction to the action failure probability of the human operator. The results of the fuzzy model, after the defuzzification process, are human error probabilities in the form of crisp numbers, which can eventually be used in probabilistic assessments and cost—benefit analyses in order to compare the parameters’ adjustment cost with the impact this adjustment has on the performance and reliability of the human operator.

Suggested Citation

  • M Konstandinidou & Z Nivolianitou & C Kiranoudis & N Markatos, 2008. "Evaluation of significant transitions in the influencing factors of human reliability," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(1), pages 39-45, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:222:y:2008:i:1:p:39-45
    DOI: 10.1243/1748006XJRR68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1243/1748006XJRR68
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1243/1748006XJRR68?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstandinidou, Myrto & Nivolianitou, Zoe & Kiranoudis, Chris & Markatos, Nikolaos, 2006. "A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(6), pages 706-716.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monferini, A. & Konstandinidou, M. & Nivolianitou, Z. & Weber, S. & Kontogiannis, T. & Kafka, P. & Kay, A.M. & Leva, M.C. & Demichela, M., 2013. "A compound methodology to assess the impact of human and organizational factors impact on the risk level of hazardous industrial plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 280-289.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Bing & Yip, Tsz Leung & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Marzio Marseguerra & Enrico Zio & Massimo Librizzi, 2007. "Human Reliability Analysis by Fuzzy “CREAM”," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 137-154, February.
    3. Donghun Lee & Hyungju Kim & Kwiyeon Koo & Sooyeon Kwon, 2024. "Human Reliability Analysis for Fishing Vessels in Korea Using Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-26, April.
    4. Felipe Aguirre & Mohamed Sallak & Walter Schön & Fabien Belmonte, 2013. "Application of evidential networks in quantitative analysis of railway accidents," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(4), pages 368-384, August.
    5. Di Pasquale, Valentina & Miranda, Salvatore & Iannone, Raffaele & Riemma, Stefano, 2015. "A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 17-32.
    6. Luca Podofillini & Vinh Dang & Enrico Zio & Piero Baraldi & Massimo Librizzi, 2010. "Using Expert Models in Human Reliability Analysis—A Dependence Assessment Method Based on Fuzzy Logic," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(8), pages 1277-1297, August.
    7. Martin Folch-Calvo & Francisco Brocal-Fernández & Cristina González-Gaya & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2020. "Analysis and Characterization of Risk Methodologies Applied to Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-35, September.
    8. Shuen‐Tai Ung & Wei‐Min Shen, 2011. "A Novel Human Error Probability Assessment Using Fuzzy Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 745-757, May.
    9. He, Ye & Kuai, Nian-Sheng & Deng, Li-Min & He, Xiong-Yuan, 2021. "A method for assessing Human Error Probability through physiological and psychological factors tests based on CREAM and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Su, Xiaoyan & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Xu, Peida & Deng, Yong, 2014. "Inclusion of task dependence in human reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 41-55.
    11. Monferini, A. & Konstandinidou, M. & Nivolianitou, Z. & Weber, S. & Kontogiannis, T. & Kafka, P. & Kay, A.M. & Leva, M.C. & Demichela, M., 2013. "A compound methodology to assess the impact of human and organizational factors impact on the risk level of hazardous industrial plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 280-289.
    12. Bedford, Tim & Bayley, Clare & Revie, Matthew, 2013. "Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of Human Reliability Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 100-110.
    13. Nan, Cen & Eusgeld, Irene & Kröger, Wolfgang, 2013. "Analyzing vulnerabilities between SCADA system and SUC due to interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 76-93.
    14. Kim, Do-Hoon, 2020. "Human factors influencing the ship operator's perceived risk in the last moment of collision encounter," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Fu, Chao & Yang, Jian-Bo & Yang, Shan-Lin, 2015. "A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 886-893.
    16. Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Akyuz, Emre & Arslan, Ozcan, 2022. "An extended HEART Dempster–Shafer evidence theory approach to assess human reliability for the gas freeing process on chemical tankers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    17. Carole Duval & Geoffrey Fallet-Fidry & Benoît Iung & Philippe Weber & Eric Levrat, 2012. "A Bayesian network-based integrated risk analysis approach for industrial systems: application to heat sink system and prospects development," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(5), pages 488-507, October.
    18. Wang, Lijing & Wang, Yanlong & Chen, Yingchun & Pan, Xing & Zhang, Wenjin & Zhu, Yanzhi, 2020. "Methodology for assessing dependencies between factors influencing airline pilot performance reliability: A case of taxiing tasks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. Kim, Yochan & Park, Jinkyun & Jung, Wondea, 2017. "A classification scheme of erroneous behaviors for human error probability estimations based on simulator data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-13.
    20. Oguz, Elif & Kubicek, Martin & Clelland, David, 2018. "Failure modes and criticality analysis of the preliminary design phase of the Mars Desert Research Station considering human factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 247-254.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:222:y:2008:i:1:p:39-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.