IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v178y2018icp247-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure modes and criticality analysis of the preliminary design phase of the Mars Desert Research Station considering human factors

Author

Listed:
  • Oguz, Elif
  • Kubicek, Martin
  • Clelland, David

Abstract

This work presents an extension to the traditional FMECA (Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis) method to include the effects of human factors concerning accessibility/repairability, probability of contact and degree of contact. The authors refer to this extension to the traditional FMECA as the Human Design Approach (HDA). All data used in this study was collected during the stay of two of the authors at the Mars Desert Research Station (MDRS) in the Utah desert, USA. The MDRS is a laboratory for carrying out research in order to understand and investigate the difficulties of how to live and work on another planet. The results show that following the HDA can enhance the safety and reliability of the MDRS. There is still a significant amount of research required concerning reliability analysis of the space habitat in terms of the selection of optimum designs, the modification of systems, as well as access, inspection and maintenance strategies, human factors and environmental impacts. This preliminary study will assist the design engineers with the selection of an optimum configuration for space habitats and can be extended to any case where humans can influence function of an environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Oguz, Elif & Kubicek, Martin & Clelland, David, 2018. "Failure modes and criticality analysis of the preliminary design phase of the Mars Desert Research Station considering human factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 247-254.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:178:y:2018:i:c:p:247-254
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.06.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017314461
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2018.06.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstandinidou, Myrto & Nivolianitou, Zoe & Kiranoudis, Chris & Markatos, Nikolaos, 2006. "A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(6), pages 706-716.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Wencheng & Kou, Xingyi & Zhang, Yue & Mi, Rongwei & Yin, Dezhi & Xiao, Wei & Liu, Zhanru, 2021. "Operational failure analysis of high-speed electric multiple units: A Bayesian network-K2 algorithm-expectation maximization approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Bing & Yip, Tsz Leung & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Akyuz, Emre & Arslan, Ozcan, 2022. "An extended HEART Dempster–Shafer evidence theory approach to assess human reliability for the gas freeing process on chemical tankers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Marzio Marseguerra & Enrico Zio & Massimo Librizzi, 2007. "Human Reliability Analysis by Fuzzy “CREAM”," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 137-154, February.
    4. Donghun Lee & Hyungju Kim & Kwiyeon Koo & Sooyeon Kwon, 2024. "Human Reliability Analysis for Fishing Vessels in Korea Using Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Felipe Aguirre & Mohamed Sallak & Walter Schön & Fabien Belmonte, 2013. "Application of evidential networks in quantitative analysis of railway accidents," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(4), pages 368-384, August.
    6. Carole Duval & Geoffrey Fallet-Fidry & Benoît Iung & Philippe Weber & Eric Levrat, 2012. "A Bayesian network-based integrated risk analysis approach for industrial systems: application to heat sink system and prospects development," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(5), pages 488-507, October.
    7. Wang, Lijing & Wang, Yanlong & Chen, Yingchun & Pan, Xing & Zhang, Wenjin & Zhu, Yanzhi, 2020. "Methodology for assessing dependencies between factors influencing airline pilot performance reliability: A case of taxiing tasks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Di Pasquale, Valentina & Miranda, Salvatore & Iannone, Raffaele & Riemma, Stefano, 2015. "A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 17-32.
    9. Kim, Yochan & Park, Jinkyun & Jung, Wondea, 2017. "A classification scheme of erroneous behaviors for human error probability estimations based on simulator data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-13.
    10. Luca Podofillini & Vinh Dang & Enrico Zio & Piero Baraldi & Massimo Librizzi, 2010. "Using Expert Models in Human Reliability Analysis—A Dependence Assessment Method Based on Fuzzy Logic," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(8), pages 1277-1297, August.
    11. Bing Wu & Xinping Yan & Yang Wang & C. Guedes Soares, 2017. "An Evidential Reasoning‐Based CREAM to Human Reliability Analysis in Maritime Accident Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1936-1957, October.
    12. Martin Folch-Calvo & Francisco Brocal-Fernández & Cristina González-Gaya & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2020. "Analysis and Characterization of Risk Methodologies Applied to Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-35, September.
    13. Shuen‐Tai Ung & Wei‐Min Shen, 2011. "A Novel Human Error Probability Assessment Using Fuzzy Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 745-757, May.
    14. Hussein Slim & Sylvie Nadeau, 2020. "A Mixed Rough Sets/Fuzzy Logic Approach for Modelling Systemic Performance Variability with FRAM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    15. He, Ye & Kuai, Nian-Sheng & Deng, Li-Min & He, Xiong-Yuan, 2021. "A method for assessing Human Error Probability through physiological and psychological factors tests based on CREAM and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Su, Xiaoyan & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Xu, Peida & Deng, Yong, 2014. "Inclusion of task dependence in human reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 41-55.
    17. Monferini, A. & Konstandinidou, M. & Nivolianitou, Z. & Weber, S. & Kontogiannis, T. & Kafka, P. & Kay, A.M. & Leva, M.C. & Demichela, M., 2013. "A compound methodology to assess the impact of human and organizational factors impact on the risk level of hazardous industrial plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 280-289.
    18. Bedford, Tim & Bayley, Clare & Revie, Matthew, 2013. "Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of Human Reliability Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 100-110.
    19. Nan, Cen & Eusgeld, Irene & Kröger, Wolfgang, 2013. "Analyzing vulnerabilities between SCADA system and SUC due to interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 76-93.
    20. Kim, Do-Hoon, 2020. "Human factors influencing the ship operator's perceived risk in the last moment of collision encounter," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:178:y:2018:i:c:p:247-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.