IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v15y2019i5p1550147719849381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The generalization negation of probability distribution and its application in target recognition based on sensor fusion

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaozhuan Gao
  • Yong Deng

Abstract

Target recognition in uncertain environments is a hot issue. Fusion rules are used to combine the sensor reports from different sources. In this situation, obtaining more information to make correct decision is an essential issue. Probability distribution is one of the most used methods to represent uncertainty information. In addition, the negation of probability distribution provides a new view to represent the uncertainty information. In this article, the existing negation of probability distribution is extended with Tsallis entropy. The main reason is that different systems have different parameter q . Some numerical examples are used to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method. Besides, the article also discusses the application of negation in target recognition based on sensor fusion to further demonstrate the importance of negation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaozhuan Gao & Yong Deng, 2019. "The generalization negation of probability distribution and its application in target recognition based on sensor fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(5), pages 15501477198, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:15:y:2019:i:5:p:1550147719849381
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147719849381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147719849381
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147719849381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Surapati Pramanik & Shyamal Dalapati & Shariful Alam & Florentin Smarandache & Tapan Kumar Roy, 2018. "NC-Cross Entropy Based MADM Strategy in Neutrosophic Cubic Set Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Bing Wu & Xinping Yan & Yang Wang & C. Guedes Soares, 2017. "An Evidential Reasoning‐Based CREAM to Human Reliability Analysis in Maritime Accident Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1936-1957, October.
    3. Wilk, G. & Włodarczyk, Z., 2008. "Example of a possible interpretation of Tsallis entropy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(19), pages 4809-4813.
    4. Deng, Wei & Deng, Yong, 2018. "Entropic methodology for entanglement measures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 693-697.
    5. Preda, Vasile & Dedu, Silvia & Gheorghe, Carmen, 2015. "New classes of Lorenz curves by maximizing Tsallis entropy under mean and Gini equality and inequality constraints," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 925-932.
    6. Li, Meizhu & Zhang, Qi & Deng, Yong, 2018. "Evidential identification of influential nodes in network of networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 283-296.
    7. Yin, Likang & Deng, Yong, 2018. "Toward uncertainty of weighted networks: An entropy-based model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 508(C), pages 176-186.
    8. Khammar, A.H. & Jahanshahi, S.M.A., 2018. "Quantile based Tsallis entropy in residual lifetime," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 492(C), pages 994-1006.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingo Klein, 2022. "Some Technical Remarks on Negations of Discrete Probability Distributions and Their Information Loss," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Priya Tanwar & Amit Srivastava, 2023. "Generalization of negation of a probability distribution," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 447-454, March.
    3. Tanwar, Priya & Srivastava, Amit, 2023. "Negation and redistribution with a preference — An information theoretic analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Liguo Fei & Jun Xia & Yuqiang Feng & Luning Liu, 2019. "A novel method to determine basic probability assignment in Dempster–Shafer theory and its application in multi-sensor information fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(7), pages 15501477198, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Bo & Deng, Yong, 2019. "A cluster-growing dimension of complex networks: From the view of node closeness centrality," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 80-87.
    2. Ahmad, Amreen & Ahmad, Tanvir & Bhatt, Abhishek, 2020. "HWSMCB: A community-based hybrid approach for identifying influential nodes in the social network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    3. Wu, Bing & Yip, Tsz Leung & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Akyuz, Emre & Arslan, Ozcan, 2022. "An extended HEART Dempster–Shafer evidence theory approach to assess human reliability for the gas freeing process on chemical tankers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Yuga Raju Gunda & Suprakash Gupta & Lalit Kumar Singh, 2023. "Assessing human performance and human reliability: a review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(3), pages 817-828, June.
    6. Xinyu Huang & Dongming Chen & Dongqi Wang & Tao Ren, 2020. "MINE: Identifying Top- k Vital Nodes in Complex Networks via Maximum Influential Neighbors Expansion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Wang, Lei & Liu, Qing & Dong, Shiyu & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Selection of countermeasure portfolio for shipping safety with consideration of investment risk aversion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Duan, Shuyu & Wen, Tao & Jiang, Wen, 2019. "A new information dimension of complex network based on Rényi entropy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 516(C), pages 529-542.
    9. Vytautas Paulauskas & Viktoras Senčila & Donatas Paulauskas & Martynas Simutis, 2023. "Impact of Port Shallowness (Clearance under the Ship’s Keel) on Shipping Safety, Energy Consumption and Sustainability of Green Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Zhou, Yusheng & Li, Xue & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Holistic risk assessment of container shipping service based on Bayesian Network Modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Yu Zhang & Wen Jiang & Xinyang Deng, 2019. "Fault diagnosis method based on time domain weighted data aggregation and information fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(9), pages 15501477198, September.
    12. Wang, Likun & Yang, Zaili, 2018. "Bayesian network modelling and analysis of accident severity in waterborne transportation: A case study in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 277-289.
    13. Bing Wu & Huibin Tian & Xinping Yan & C. Guedes Soares, 2020. "A probabilistic consequence estimation model for collision accidents in the downstream of Yangtze River using Bayesian Networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 422-436, April.
    14. Thapliyal, Richa & Taneja, H.C. & Kumar, Vikas, 2015. "Characterization results based on non-additive entropy of order statistics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 417(C), pages 297-303.
    15. Abrishami, Shokoufeh & Khakzad, Nima & Hosseini, Seyed Mahmoud, 2020. "A data-based comparison of BN-HRA models in assessing human error probability: An offshore evacuation case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Rong, H. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Maritime traffic probabilistic prediction based on ship motion pattern extraction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Du, Lei & Goerlandt, Floris & Kujala, Pentti, 2020. "Review and analysis of methods for assessing maritime waterway risk based on non-accident critical events detected from AIS data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. Ziyang Ye & Yanyi Chen & Tao Wang & Baiyuan Tang & Chengpeng Wan & Hao Zhang & Bozhong Zhou, 2024. "A Two-Stage Bayesian Network Approach to Inland Waterway Navigation Risk Assessment Considering the Characteristics of Different River Segments: A Case of the Yangtze River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Fan, Cunlong & Montewka, Jakub & Zhang, Di, 2022. "A risk comparison framework for autonomous ships navigation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    20. Ji, Changcheng & Gao, Fei & Liu, Wenjiang, 2024. "Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on cloud model and best-worst method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:15:y:2019:i:5:p:1550147719849381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.