IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v15y2019i9p1550147719875629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fault diagnosis method based on time domain weighted data aggregation and information fusion

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zhang
  • Wen Jiang
  • Xinyang Deng

Abstract

Fault diagnosis of equipment is a key issue in the industrial field, and it is essential to keep abreast of equipment status. However, previous studies either considered fault data at a single moment or gave the same weight to data over a period of time. In view of the problems above, fault diagnosis method based on time domain weighted data aggregation and information fusion is proposed in this article. First, the monitored data of sensors loaded by the equipment are aggregated utilizing the linear decaying weights. Then, Gaussian models of each fault type under different fault features are established based on aggregated data. And the basic probability assignments are generated by matching aggregated testing samples with the constructed Gaussian model. At last, the basic probability assignments generated under each fault feature are fused by Dempster combination rule. The proposed method is verified and the results show that the total fault recognition rate can reach 97.5%, which increased by 1.9% compared with the method that Gaussian model constructed by original data.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zhang & Wen Jiang & Xinyang Deng, 2019. "Fault diagnosis method based on time domain weighted data aggregation and information fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(9), pages 15501477198, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:15:y:2019:i:9:p:1550147719875629
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147719875629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147719875629
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147719875629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Meizhu & Zhang, Qi & Deng, Yong, 2018. "Evidential identification of influential nodes in network of networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 283-296.
    2. Deng, Xinyang & Jiang, Wen & Wang, Zhen, 2019. "Zero-sum polymatrix games with link uncertainty: A Dempster-Shafer theory solution," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 101-112.
    3. Lei Chen & Ling Diao & Jun Sang, 2019. "A novel weighted evidence combination rule based on improved entropy function with a diagnosis application," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(1), pages 15501477188, January.
    4. Fu, Chao & Chang, Wenjun & Xue, Min & Yang, Shanlin, 2019. "Multiple criteria group decision making with belief distributions and distributed preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 623-633.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen, Tao & Jiang, Wen, 2019. "Identifying influential nodes based on fuzzy local dimension in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 332-342.
    2. Liguo Fei & Jun Xia & Yuqiang Feng & Luning Liu, 2019. "A novel method to determine basic probability assignment in Dempster–Shafer theory and its application in multi-sensor information fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(7), pages 15501477198, July.
    3. Duan, Shuyu & Wen, Tao & Jiang, Wen, 2019. "A new information dimension of complex network based on Rényi entropy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 516(C), pages 529-542.
    4. Shijun Xu & Yi Hou & Xinpu Deng & Peibo Chen & Kewei Ouyang & Ye Zhang, 2021. "A novel divergence measure in Dempster–Shafer evidence theory based on pignistic probability transform and its application in multi-sensor data fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 17(7), pages 15501477211, July.
    5. Eduardo Fernández & Claudia Gómez-Santillán & Nelson Rangel-Valdez & Laura Cruz-Reyes, 2022. "Group Multi-Objective Optimization Under Imprecision and Uncertainty Using a Novel Interval Outranking Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 945-994, October.
    6. Huimin Xiao & Shouwen Wu & Chunsheng Cui, 2022. "The Research on Consistency Checking and Improvement of Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relation Based on Similarity Measure and Minimum Adjustment Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Juan Antonio Morente-Molinera & Francisco Javier Cabrerizo & Sergio Alonso & Ignacio Javier Pérez & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2020. "Assisting Users in Decisions Using Fuzzy Ontologies: Application in the Wine Market," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Min Xue & Chao Fu & Shanlin Yang, 2022. "A comparative analysis of probabilistic linguistic preference relations and distributed preference relations for decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 71-97, March.
    9. Deng, Xinyang & Jiang, Wen & Wang, Zhen, 2020. "An Information Source Selection Model Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 385(C).
    10. Yutong Song & Yong Deng, 2019. "A new method to measure the divergence in evidential sensor data fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(4), pages 15501477198, April.
    11. Du, Yuxian & Lin, Xi & Pan, Ye & Chen, Zhaoxin & Xia, Huan & Luo, Qian, 2023. "Identifying influential airports in airline network based on failure risk factors with TOPSIS," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    12. Xiao, Feng & Li, Jin & Wei, Bo, 2022. "Cascading failure analysis and critical node identification in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 596(C).
    13. Tang, Jinjun & Li, Zhitao & Gao, Fan & Zong, Fang, 2021. "Identifying critical metro stations in multiplex network based on D–S evidence theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 574(C).
    14. Xiaohong Chen & Weiwei Zhang & Xuanhua Xu & Wenzhi Cao, 2022. "Managing Group Confidence and Consensus in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Large Group Decision-Making Based on Social Media Data Mining," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 995-1023, October.
    15. Lei, Mingli, 2022. "Information dimension based on Deng entropy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).
    16. Ahmad, Amreen & Ahmad, Tanvir & Bhatt, Abhishek, 2020. "HWSMCB: A community-based hybrid approach for identifying influential nodes in the social network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    17. Wu, Yu’e & Zhang, Zhipeng & Yang, Guoli & Liu, Haixin & Zhang, Qingfeng, 2022. "Evolution of cooperation driven by diversity on a double-layer square lattice," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Xinyu Huang & Dongming Chen & Dongqi Wang & Tao Ren, 2020. "MINE: Identifying Top- k Vital Nodes in Complex Networks via Maximum Influential Neighbors Expansion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Cui, Huizi & Zhou, Lingge & Li, Yan & Kang, Bingyi, 2022. "Belief entropy-of-entropy and its application in the cardiac interbeat interval time series analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Xiaozhuan Gao & Yong Deng, 2019. "The generalization negation of probability distribution and its application in target recognition based on sensor fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(5), pages 15501477198, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:15:y:2019:i:9:p:1550147719875629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.