IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v1y2000i2p207-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Policy and the Role of Multinationals and Local Enterprises in the Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Pradeep Kanta Ray

    (School of International Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney)

  • Shams Ur-Rahman

    (The Graduate School of Management, University of Western Australia, Nedlands)

Abstract

This paper examines the behavioural differences between multinational and local enterprises in their role as agents of development and transformation in the Indian pharmaceuticals industry. A case study of two large enterprises in the pharmaceuticals industry shows how a model of development spurred by national enterprises based on reverse engineering promotes industrial deepening in India. The comparison also illuminates the multinational enterprise (MNE) affiliate's position within the dynamics of its parental affiliation and its local institutional context, and how such a position may contrast and complement the position that local enterprises (LEs) occupy. The case study is followed by a matched pairs test of 169 enterprises in the Indian chemicals industry to distinguish how nationality might influence a firm's strategic role. Important differences between the ownership groups arise along four major strategic dimensions of technological activities, degree of vertical integration, trade orientation and product-environment compatibility. Local enterprises satisfy a majority of developmental goals while MNE affiliates comply with some transformational goals, and complement the efforts of LEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pradeep Kanta Ray & Shams Ur-Rahman, 2000. "Public Policy and the Role of Multinationals and Local Enterprises in the Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Industry," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 207-228, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:1:y:2000:i:2:p:207-228
    DOI: 10.1177/097215090000100204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097215090000100204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097215090000100204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McAleese, Dermot & McDonald, Donogh, 1978. "Employment Growth and the Development of Linkages in Foreign-Owned and Domestic Manufacturing Enterprises," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 40(4), pages 321-339, November.
    2. Kumar, Nagesh, 1991. "Mode of rivalry and comparative behaviour of multinational and local enterprises : The case of Indian manufacturing," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 381-392, April.
    3. R. E. Caves & M. E. Porter, 1977. "From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 91(2), pages 241-261.
    4. Lall, Sanjaya, 1976. "Conflicts of concepts: Welfare economics and developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 181-195, March.
    5. Newfarmer, Richard S. & Marsh, Lawrence C., 1981. "Foreign ownership, market structure and industrial performance : Brazil's electrical industry," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 47-75, February.
    6. D. Eleanor Westney, 1993. "Institutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Sumantra Ghoshal & D. Eleanor Westney (ed.), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, chapter 3, pages 53-76, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Baranson, Jack, 1970. "Technology Transfer Through the International Firm," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 435-440, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, Nagesh, 1996. "Foreign Direct Investments and Technology Transfers in Development: A Perspective on Recent Literature," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 1996-06, United Nations University - INTECH.
    2. Mas-Ruiz, Francisco J. & Ruiz-Conde, Enar & Calderón-Martínez, Aurora, 2018. "Strategic group influence on entry mode choices in foreign markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1259-1269.
    3. Chang-Yang Lee & Ji-Hwan Lee & Ajai S. Gaur, 2017. "Are large business groups conducive to industry innovation? The moderating role of technological appropriability," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 313-337, June.
    4. Silk Alvin J. & Berndt Ernst R., 2004. "Holding Company Cost Economies in the Global Advertising and Marketing Services Business," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-51, June.
    5. Faouzi Bensebaa, 2003. "La dynamique concurrentielle:défis analytiques et méthodologiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(1), pages 5-37, March.
    6. Hałaj, Grzegorz & Żochowski, Dawid, 2006. "Strategic groups in Polish banking sector and financial stability," MPRA Paper 326, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Raquel Ortega-Argilés & Rosina Moreno, 2005. "Firm Competitive Strategies And The Likelihood Of Survival - The Spanish Case," ERSA conference papers ersa05p347, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Ding, John Y., 1993. "Toward a Framework for Analyzing Multimarket Contact and Multinational Competition," Occasional Papers 233154, Regional Research Project NC-194: Organization and Performance of World Food Systems.
    9. K. Ramakrishnan, 2010. "Business Strategy versus Performance Trade-offs," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 11(3), pages 317-331, October.
    10. Yi-Min Chen, 2008. "How Much Does Country Matter?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(4), pages 404-435, October.
    11. Huang, Kuo-Feng, 2009. "How do strategic groups handle cognitive complexity to sustain competitive advantage? A commentary essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 1296-1298, December.
    12. Sandro Montresor & Antonio Vezzani, 2015. "On the R&D giants’ shoulders: do FDI help to stand on them?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 42(1), pages 33-60, March.
    13. Eduardo Ortas & Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez & Igor Álvarez, 2019. "National institutions, stakeholder engagement, and firms' environmental, social, and governance performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 598-611, May.
    14. Schmalensee, Richard., 1985. "Testing the differential efficiency hypothesis," Working papers 1628-85., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    15. David Audretsch & Yvonne Prince & A. Thurik, 1999. "Do small firms compete with large firms?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 27(2), pages 201-209, June.
    16. Changhyun Kim & Richard A. Bettis, 2014. "Cash is surprisingly valuable as a strategic asset," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(13), pages 2053-2063, December.
    17. Wang, David Han-Min & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Chiang, Chia-Hsin, 2016. "Exploring the value relevance of corporate reputation: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1329-1332.
    18. Stoian, Carmen & Mohr, Alex, 2016. "Outward foreign direct investment from emerging economies: escaping home country regulative voids," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1124-1135.
    19. Enrique Claver & Jose Molina & Juan Tari, 2003. "Strategic groups and firm performance: the case of Spanish house-building firms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 369-377.
    20. Manuel Vallejo, 2008. "Is the Culture of Family Firms Really Different? A Value-based Model for Its Survival through Generations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 261-279, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:1:y:2000:i:2:p:207-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.