IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v15y2014i4p847-866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Firm-specific Attributes on Shareholder Value Creation of Indian Companies: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sweety Narang

    (Sweety Narang, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Khalsa College for Women, Amritsar, India. E-mail: sweety_narang2001@yahoo.co.in)

  • Mandeep Kaur

    (Mandeep Kaur, Associate Professor, Department of Commerce and Business Management, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India. E-mail: mkaur02@yahoo.co.in)

Abstract

This exploratory study attempts to discover the impact of firm-specific characteristics on the shareholder value of the listed companies in India. Apart from this, it seeks to explore whether the significant firm attributes are common to both the dimensions of shareholder value, that is, accounting-based (economic value added (EVA)) as well as market-based dimensions (market value added (MVA) and Tobin’s Q). The data for this study consists of panel data of 100 companies in India covering the financial years from 1997–1998 to 2008–2009. Multiple regression analysis is employed to study the relationship. The study reveals that investors tend to reward the companies which have higher profitability, lower market risk, efficient resource management, high leverage, more liquidity, higher marketing expenditures and robust market capitalization. Evaluating shareholder value on the basis of accounting and market-based dimensions, the study identifies that the selected corporate attributes explain about 34 per cent of the variation in the accounting-based surrogate EVA, whereas they account for more than 55 per cent variation in the firm’s shareholder value when it is measured on the basis of market-based surrogates, MVA and Tobin’s Q. The primary limitations of this study are the size of its sample and non-inclusion of other variables (for example, market, environmental, regulatory, etc.) which may have an effect on the shareholder value. As maximizing shareholder value has become the widely accepted corporate objective the world over, its enhancement has become the key responsibility of corporate executives and managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sweety Narang & Mandeep Kaur, 2014. "Impact of Firm-specific Attributes on Shareholder Value Creation of Indian Companies: An Empirical Analysis," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(4), pages 847-866, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:847-866
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150914543422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150914543422
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150914543422?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biddle, Gary C. & Bowen, Robert M. & Wallace, James S., 1997. "Does EVA(R) beat earnings? Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 301-336, December.
    2. Fernández, Pablo, 2002. "EVA, Economic profit and cash value added do NOT measure shareholder value creation," IESE Research Papers D/453, IESE Business School.
    3. I. M. Pandey, 2005. "What Drives the Shareholder Value?," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 1(1), pages 105-120.
    4. Nikhil Varaiya & Roger A. Kerin & David Weeks, 1987. "The relationship between growth, profitability, and firm value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), pages 487-497, September.
    5. Tobin, James, 1969. "A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 15-29, February.
    6. Duc Khuong Nguyen & Walid Mensi & Adel Boubaker, 2008. "More on corporate diversification, firm size and value creation," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 7(3), pages 1-7.
    7. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:7:y:2008:i:3:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Andrew C. Worthington & Tracey West, 2004. "Australian Evidence Concerning the Information Content of Economic Value-Added," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(2), pages 201-223, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frimpong, Siaw, 2018. "Working capital policies and value creation of listed non-financial firms in Ghana: a panel FMOLS analysis," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(4), pages 725-742, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oksana Melnyk, 2019. "Financial Innovation for Assessing the Enterprise Capitalization," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 95-99, September.
    2. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Leo Vashkor Dewri, 2022. "A Critical Assessment of Interrelationship Among Corporate Governance, Financial Performance, Refined Economic Value Added to Measure Firm Value and Return on Stock," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2718-2759, December.
    4. Hartwell, Christopher A. & Malinowska, Anna P., 2019. "Informal institutions and firm valuation," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Ashita Agrawal & Pitabas Mohanty & Navindra Kumar Totala, 2019. "Does EVA Beat ROA and ROE in Explaining the Stock Returns in Indian Scenario? An Evidence Using Mixed Effects Panel Data Regression Model," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(2), pages 103-134, May.
    6. Claudiu Botoc, 2015. "Risk And Firm Value In European Companies: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 792-800, July.
    7. Stefan Hirsch & David Lanter & Robert Finger, 2021. "Profitability and profit persistence in EU food retailing: Differences between top competitors and fringe firms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 235-263, April.
    8. Kowalski Michał J. & Kazak Jan K., 2020. "Value-Based Management for Real Estate Developers’ Activities," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(4), pages 48-62, December.
    9. Sujata Behera, 2020. "Does the EVA valuation model explain the market value of equity better under changing required return than constant required return?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Farouq Altahtamouni, 2018. "Determinants of Market Value (Case of Jordanian Banks)," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 124-132, January.
    11. Namik Erdogan & Serpil Altinirmak & Caglar Karamasa, 2016. "Performance Assessment of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT) Listed in BIST Via Different Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(7), pages 304-304, July.
    12. Jordan, Dan J. & Rice, Douglas & Sanchez, Jacques & Wort, Donald H., 2011. "Explaining bank market-to-book ratios: Evidence from 2006 to 2009," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 2047-2055, August.
    13. Sujata Behera, 2021. "Does EVA valuation model outperform earnings valuation model in explaining market value of equity?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6312-6337, October.
    14. Lanter, David & Hirsch, Stefan & Finger, Robert, 2018. "Profitability and Competition in EU Food Retailing," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274202, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Chikashi Tsuji, 2006. "Does EVA beat earnings and cash flow in Japan?," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(16), pages 1199-1216.
    16. Herwartz, Helmut & Reimers, Hans-Eggert, 2006. "Modelling the Fisher hypothesis: World wide evidence," Economics Working Papers 2006-04, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    17. Kristinn Hermannsson & Patrizio Lecca, 2016. "Human Capital in Economic Development: From Labour Productivity to Macroeconomic Impact," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 35(1), pages 24-36, March.
    18. Frederico Belo & Chen Xue & Lu Zhang, 2010. "Cross-sectional Tobin's Q," NBER Working Papers 16336, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Timothy Erickson & Toni M. Whited, 2000. "Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment and q," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(5), pages 1027-1057, October.
    20. Athanasios Geromichalos & Lucas Herrenbrueck, 2022. "The Liquidity-Augmented Model of Macroeconomic Aggregates: A New Monetarist DSGE Approach," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 45, pages 134-167, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:847-866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.