IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v22y1998i1p46-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Illustration of Item Homoge-Neity Scaling and Multilevel Analysis Techniques in the Evaluation of Drug Prevention Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Ita G.G. Kreft

    (California State University, Los Angeles)

Abstract

Many reports of successful school-based intervention programs can be criticized for their choice of a unit of analysis and for the neglect of measurement errors. This article is an illustration of how different conclusions can be reached from different choices of units of analyses and/or of different treatment of the data. This is done by a reanalysis of a well-reported data set. The data is thoroughly taken apart, using different statistical techniques. The result of the analyses shows that earlier reported effects of a normative school-based drug prevention program were not found. The subsequent search for moderator effects of the same program, such as a lowering effect on the relationship between the pre- and posttest or on the relationship between respon dents' use and the use of their fnends, was not successful either. It is concluded that the null hypothesis of zero effects should be retained. More successful was a search for individual charac teristics that show significant relationships with respondents'alcohol use. Among them was the abuse of alcohol by adults in respondents' direct social environment and the use of friends .

Suggested Citation

  • Ita G.G. Kreft, 1998. "An Illustration of Item Homoge-Neity Scaling and Multilevel Analysis Techniques in the Evaluation of Drug Prevention Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(1), pages 46-77, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:22:y:1998:i:1:p:46-77
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9802200103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9802200103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9802200103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B . Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1996. "Three-Year Follow-Up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(1), pages 49-66, February.
    2. Ennett, S.T. & Tobler, N.S. & Ringwalt, C.L. & Flewelling, R.L., 1994. "How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(9), pages 1394-1401.
    3. Jan De Leeuw & Ita Kreft, 1986. "Random Coefficient Models for Multilevel Analysis," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 11(1), pages 57-85, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard L. Dukes & Judith A. Stein & Jodie B. Ullman, 1997. "Long-Term Impact of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 483-500, August.
    2. Ying Liu & Fang Luo & Danhui Zhang & Hongyun Liu, 2017. "Comparison and robustness of the REML, ML, MIVQUE estimators for multi-level random mediation model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1644-1661, July.
    3. Benjamin W. Fisher & Anthony Petrosino & Hannah Sutherland & Sarah Guckenburg & Trevor Fronius & Ivan Benitez & Kevin Earl, 2023. "School‐based law enforcement strategies to reduce crime, increase perceptions of safety, and improve learning outcomes in primary and secondary schools: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    4. Anderson, D. Mark, 2010. "Does information matter? The effect of the Meth Project on meth use among youths," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 732-742, September.
    5. Richard F. Catalano & M. Lisa Berglund & Jean A. M. Ryan & Heather S. Lonczak & J. David Hawkins, 2004. "Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 591(1), pages 98-124, January.
    6. Andrés Raineri Bernain, 2001. "Desarrollo De Habilidades Psicosociales En Ejecutivos: Una Revision De La Literatura," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(2), pages 157-192.
    7. Xu, Mengya & Xin, Jing & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min & Cai, Zhongliang, 2017. "Social inequalities of park accessibility in Shenzhen, China: The role of park quality, transport modes, and hierarchical socioeconomic characteristics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 38-50.
    8. Maria Grazia Pittau & Riccardo Massari & Roberto Zelli, 2013. "Hierarchical Modelling of Disparities in Preferences for Redistribution," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 75(4), pages 556-584, August.
    9. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B . Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1996. "Three-Year Follow-Up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(1), pages 49-66, February.
    10. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B. Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1995. "An Evaluation of D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), Using a Solomon Four-Group Design With Latent Variables," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 409-435, August.
    11. Wei Pan & Haiyan Bai, 2009. "A Multivariate Approach to a Meta-Analytic Review of the Effectiveness of the D.A.R.E. Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, January.
    12. Hale, Daniel & Coleman, John & Layard, Richard, 2011. "A model for the delivery of evidence-based PSHE (personal wellbeing) in secondary schools," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121726, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Lorraine Green Mazerolle & Sacha Rombouts & David W. Soole, 2005. "PROTOCOL: A Systematic Review of Drug Law Enforcement Strategies," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19.
    14. Dennis J. Palumbo & Jennifer L. Ferguson, 1995. "Evaluating Gang Resistance Education and Training (Great)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(6), pages 597-619, December.
    15. Blut, Markus & Beatty, Sharon E. & Evanschitzky, Heiner & Brock, Christian, 2014. "The Impact of Service Characteristics on the Switching Costs–Customer Loyalty Link," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 275-290.
    16. James X. Sullivan, 2018. "The Role of Nonprofits in Designing and Implementing Evidence-Based Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 678(1), pages 155-163, July.
    17. Sarah A. Soule, 1999. "The Diffusion of an Unsuccessful Innovation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 566(1), pages 120-131, November.
    18. Vincenzo Memoli & Venera Tomaselli, 2018. "Non-European immigration: European public opinion through media," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 72(3), pages 29-39, July-Sept.
    19. John Coleman & Daniel Hale & Richard Layard, 2011. "A Model for the Delivery of Evidence-Based PSHE (Personal Wellbeing) in Secondary Schools," CEP Discussion Papers dp1071, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    20. Morrissey, Erin & Wandersman, Abraham & Seybolt, Diana & Nation, Maury & Crusto, Cindy & Davino, Katie, 1997. "Toward a framework for bridging the gap between science and practice in prevention: A focus on evaluator and practitioner perspectives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 367-377, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:22:y:1998:i:1:p:46-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.