IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v19y1995i4p409-435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), Using a Solomon Four-Group Design With Latent Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Richard L. Dukes

    (Colorado University, Colorado Springs)

  • Jodie B. Ullman

    (University of California, Los Angeles)

  • Judith A. Stein

    (University of California, Los Angeles)

Abstract

The authors examine the effectiveness of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.), con trolling for maturation and pretest sensitization by using a Solomon Four-Group design with latent variables. Results analyzed at the classroom level (440 classrooms, 10,000 students) indicated that D.A.R.E. participation resulted in greater self-esteem, stronger institutional bonds, and endorsement of fewer risky behaviors. The pretest was reactive on one of four latent-variable outcomes: resistance to peer pressure. Maturation resulted in effects counter to D.A.R.E.: lower self-esteem and weaker institutional bonds. Effects were stronger than those reported in prior meta-analytic studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B. Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1995. "An Evaluation of D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), Using a Solomon Four-Group Design With Latent Variables," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 409-435, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:19:y:1995:i:4:p:409-435
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9501900404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9501900404
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9501900404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ennett, S.T. & Tobler, N.S. & Ringwalt, C.L. & Flewelling, R.L., 1994. "How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(9), pages 1394-1401.
    2. Moskowitz, Joel M., 1993. "Why reports of outcome evaluations are often biased or uninterpretable : Examples from evaluations of drug abuse prevention programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard L. Dukes & Judith A. Stein & Jodie B. Ullman, 1997. "Long-Term Impact of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 483-500, August.
    2. Benjamin W. Fisher & Anthony Petrosino & Hannah Sutherland & Sarah Guckenburg & Trevor Fronius & Ivan Benitez & Kevin Earl, 2023. "School‐based law enforcement strategies to reduce crime, increase perceptions of safety, and improve learning outcomes in primary and secondary schools: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    3. Anderson, D. Mark, 2010. "Does information matter? The effect of the Meth Project on meth use among youths," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 732-742, September.
    4. Richard F. Catalano & M. Lisa Berglund & Jean A. M. Ryan & Heather S. Lonczak & J. David Hawkins, 2004. "Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 591(1), pages 98-124, January.
    5. Andrés Raineri Bernain, 2001. "Desarrollo De Habilidades Psicosociales En Ejecutivos: Una Revision De La Literatura," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(2), pages 157-192.
    6. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B . Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1996. "Three-Year Follow-Up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(1), pages 49-66, February.
    7. Wei Pan & Haiyan Bai, 2009. "A Multivariate Approach to a Meta-Analytic Review of the Effectiveness of the D.A.R.E. Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Hale, Daniel & Coleman, John & Layard, Richard, 2011. "A model for the delivery of evidence-based PSHE (personal wellbeing) in secondary schools," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121726, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Lorraine Green Mazerolle & Sacha Rombouts & David W. Soole, 2005. "PROTOCOL: A Systematic Review of Drug Law Enforcement Strategies," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19.
    10. Dennis J. Palumbo & Jennifer L. Ferguson, 1995. "Evaluating Gang Resistance Education and Training (Great)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(6), pages 597-619, December.
    11. James X. Sullivan, 2018. "The Role of Nonprofits in Designing and Implementing Evidence-Based Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 678(1), pages 155-163, July.
    12. Sarah A. Soule, 1999. "The Diffusion of an Unsuccessful Innovation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 566(1), pages 120-131, November.
    13. Braver, Sanford L. & Smith, Melanie C., 1996. "Maximizing both external and internal validity in longitudinal true experiments with voluntary treatments: The "combined modified" design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 287-300, November.
    14. John Coleman & Daniel Hale & Richard Layard, 2011. "A Model for the Delivery of Evidence-Based PSHE (Personal Wellbeing) in Secondary Schools," CEP Discussion Papers dp1071, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    15. Morrissey, Erin & Wandersman, Abraham & Seybolt, Diana & Nation, Maury & Crusto, Cindy & Davino, Katie, 1997. "Toward a framework for bridging the gap between science and practice in prevention: A focus on evaluator and practitioner perspectives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 367-377, August.
    16. Kevin N. Griffith & Lawrence M. Scheier, 2013. "Did We Get Our Money’s Worth? Bridging Economic and Behavioral Measures of Program Success in Adolescent Drug Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, November.
    17. Chad Nye & Jamie Schwartz & Herb Turner, 2005. "PROTOCOL: The Effectiveness of Parental Involvement for Improving the Academic Performance of Elementary School Children," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19.
    18. Anderson, D. Mark & Rees, Daniel I., 2015. "Per se drugged driving laws and traffic fatalities," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 122-134.
    19. Joel H. Brown & Marianne D'Emidio Caston, 1995. "On Becoming "At Risk" Through Drug Education," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 451-491, August.
    20. Kelley, Allyson & Fatupaito, Bethany & Witzel, Morgan, 2018. "Is culturally based prevention effective? Results from a 3-year tribal substance use prevention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 28-35.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:19:y:1995:i:4:p:409-435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.