IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/121726.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A model for the delivery of evidence-based PSHE (personal wellbeing) in secondary schools

Author

Listed:
  • Hale, Daniel
  • Coleman, John
  • Layard, Richard

Abstract

Personal Social Health and Economic (PSHE) education is a non-statutory school subject designed to facilitate the delivery of a number of key competencies relevant to health, safety and wellbeing. As well as contributing to learning objectives in regards to these topics PSHE education has been ascribed with weighty expectations for outcomes well beyond the classroom relating to physical, mental, sexual and emotional health and safety. This paper reviews a programme of research aimed at providing guidance for the evidence-based provision of PSHE education, including a summary of the major impediments and facilitators of evidence-based programming, as well as a model curriculum for the delivery of evidence-based PSHE. An extensive literature review was conducted along with a series of interviews with programme developers, researchers, teachers and other school practitioners with the aim of developing a cohesive rationale for PSHE education and identifying evidence-based programmes which could be implemented to contribute to PSHE aims. The proposed model curriculum is comprised of evidence-based programmes which are PSHE-relevant and applicable or adaptable to the PSHE-education implementation context. While the provision of evidence-based PSHE presents a number of challenges and is limited by a lack of resources and evidence of effectiveness, with appropriate guidance PSHE education can be improved so that a comprehensive syllabus of evidence-based programmes is enacted in secondary schools. This will increase the likelihood that PSHE has the intended effect on adolescent mental and physical health and wellbeing.

Suggested Citation

  • Hale, Daniel & Coleman, John & Layard, Richard, 2011. "A model for the delivery of evidence-based PSHE (personal wellbeing) in secondary schools," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121726, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:121726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/121726/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ennett, S.T. & Tobler, N.S. & Ringwalt, C.L. & Flewelling, R.L., 1994. "How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(9), pages 1394-1401.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard L. Dukes & Judith A. Stein & Jodie B. Ullman, 1997. "Long-Term Impact of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 483-500, August.
    2. Kevin N. Griffith & Lawrence M. Scheier, 2013. "Did We Get Our Money’s Worth? Bridging Economic and Behavioral Measures of Program Success in Adolescent Drug Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, November.
    3. Benjamin W. Fisher & Anthony Petrosino & Hannah Sutherland & Sarah Guckenburg & Trevor Fronius & Ivan Benitez & Kevin Earl, 2023. "School‐based law enforcement strategies to reduce crime, increase perceptions of safety, and improve learning outcomes in primary and secondary schools: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    4. Anderson, D. Mark, 2010. "Does information matter? The effect of the Meth Project on meth use among youths," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 732-742, September.
    5. Chad Nye & Jamie Schwartz & Herb Turner, 2005. "PROTOCOL: The Effectiveness of Parental Involvement for Improving the Academic Performance of Elementary School Children," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19.
    6. Anderson, D. Mark & Rees, Daniel I., 2015. "Per se drugged driving laws and traffic fatalities," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 122-134.
    7. Richard F. Catalano & M. Lisa Berglund & Jean A. M. Ryan & Heather S. Lonczak & J. David Hawkins, 2004. "Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 591(1), pages 98-124, January.
    8. Joel H. Brown & Marianne D'Emidio Caston, 1995. "On Becoming "At Risk" Through Drug Education," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 451-491, August.
    9. Andrés Raineri Bernain, 2001. "Desarrollo De Habilidades Psicosociales En Ejecutivos: Una Revision De La Literatura," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(2), pages 157-192.
    10. Kelley, Allyson & Fatupaito, Bethany & Witzel, Morgan, 2018. "Is culturally based prevention effective? Results from a 3-year tribal substance use prevention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 28-35.
    11. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B . Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1996. "Three-Year Follow-Up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(1), pages 49-66, February.
    12. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B. Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1995. "An Evaluation of D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), Using a Solomon Four-Group Design With Latent Variables," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 409-435, August.
    13. Ita G.G. Kreft, 1998. "An Illustration of Item Homoge-Neity Scaling and Multilevel Analysis Techniques in the Evaluation of Drug Prevention Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(1), pages 46-77, February.
    14. Wei Pan & Haiyan Bai, 2009. "A Multivariate Approach to a Meta-Analytic Review of the Effectiveness of the D.A.R.E. Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, January.
    15. Lorraine Green Mazerolle & Sacha Rombouts & David W. Soole, 2005. "PROTOCOL: A Systematic Review of Drug Law Enforcement Strategies," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19.
    16. L. Thomas Winfree JR & Finn-Aage Esbensen & D. Wayne Osgood, 1996. "Evaluating a School-Based Gang-Prevention Program," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(2), pages 181-203, April.
    17. Dennis J. Palumbo & Jennifer L. Ferguson, 1995. "Evaluating Gang Resistance Education and Training (Great)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(6), pages 597-619, December.
    18. Marianne D'Emidio-Caston & Joel H. Brown, 1998. "The Other Side of the Story," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(1), pages 95-117, February.
    19. James X. Sullivan, 2018. "The Role of Nonprofits in Designing and Implementing Evidence-Based Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 678(1), pages 155-163, July.
    20. Steven A. Gilham & Wayne L. Lucas & David Sivewright, 1997. "The Impact of Drug Education and Prevention Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(5), pages 589-613, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    health education; social-emotional learning; life-skills; prevention; wellbeing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:121726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.