IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v39y2021i5p919-937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The concept of solidarity in cohesion policies of the European Union and Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Márton Czirfusz

Abstract

This paper discusses cohesion policies of the EU and Hungary from the conceptual perspective of solidarity. Continuing recent debates positioned at the intersection of solidarity, welfare state and Europeanization, a multi-scalar approach of solidarity is explored. Although the notion of solidarity – i.e. overcoming inequalities across member states and their regions – was an important conceptual building block at the foundation of the EU, the usage of the term has decreased steadily in recent decades’ EU cohesion policies, and more significantly after the 2008 economic crisis. As a parallel trend, the concept’s meaning has shifted from a more general to a reduced one in narrow policy areas. Based on a document analysis, the paper reviews cohesion policy changes of recent EU programming periods and finds that solidarity has lost importance in main planning and legislative documents, a recent shift being the growth policy relaunch of past years. Contrasting these trends with the national scale, a case study of Hungary found that the concept of solidarity was mobilized according to EU-level cohesion policy ideas during the 1990s and early 2000s, but the current right-wing government put forward a new discourse of solidarity which they related with the refugee crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Márton Czirfusz, 2021. "The concept of solidarity in cohesion policies of the European Union and Hungary," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(5), pages 919-937, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:5:p:919-937
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654420971636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654420971636
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654420971636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo Medeiros, 2017. "From smart growth to European spatial planning: a new paradigm for EU cohesion policy post-2020," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(10), pages 1856-1875, October.
    2. Thomas Farole & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Michael Storper, 2011. "Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5), pages 1089-1111, September.
    3. John Bachtler & Iain Begg, 2018. "Beyond Brexit: Reshaping policies for regional development in Europe," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(1), pages 151-170, March.
    4. Roberta Capello, 2018. "Cohesion Policies and the Creation of a European Identity: The Role of Territorial Identity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 489-503, April.
    5. Łukasz Damurski & Marcin Oleksy, 2018. "Communicative and participatory paradigm in the European territorial policies. A discourse analysis," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 1471-1492, July.
    6. Bernard Elissalde & Frédéric Santamaria & Philippe Jeanne, 2014. "Harmony and Melody in Discourse on European Cohesion," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 627-647, March.
    7. Neil Brenner, 1999. "Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 431-451, March.
    8. Marcin Dąbrowski & Katarzyna Piskorek, 2018. "The development of strategic spatial planning in Central and Eastern Europe: between path dependence, European influence, and domestic politics," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 571-589, October.
    9. Tiago Moreira Ramalho, 2020. "The Troika in its own words: responding to the politicisation of the southern European crises," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/337630, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Bachtler, John & Begg, Iain, 2018. "Beyond Brexit: reshaping policies for regional development in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86438, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Andreas Faludi, 2007. "Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society1," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 567-583, May.
    12. Marcin Dąbrowski & Ida Musiałkowska & Laura Polverari, 2018. "Introduction: drawing lessons from international policy-transfer initiatives in regional and urban development and spatial planning," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(9), pages 1165-1168, September.
    13. Valeria Lingua, 2018. "Institutionalizing EU strategic spatial planning into domestic planning systems: trajectories of change in Italy and England," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 591-614, October.
    14. Georgia Giannakourou, 2012. "The Europeanization of National Planning: Explaining the Causes and the Potentials of Change," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 117-135.
    15. Jan Drahokoupil, 2007. "Analysing the Capitalist State in Post‐Socialism: Towards the Porterian Workfare Postnational Regime," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 401-424, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vratislav Havlík, 2020. "Europeanization as the Reterritorialization of the State: Towards Conceptual Clarification," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1288-1306, September.
    2. Cristian Incaltarau & Gabriela Carmen Pascariu & Neculai‐Cristian Surubaru, 2020. "Evaluating the Determinants of EU Funds Absorption across Old and New Member States – the Role of Administrative Capacity and Political Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 941-961, July.
    3. Annie Tubadji & Thomas Colwill & Don Webber, 2021. "Voting with your feet or voting for Brexit: The tale of those stuck behind," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 247-277, April.
    4. Rosa Canelli & Riccardo Realfonzo & Francesco Zezza, 2022. "An empirical Stock‐Flow Consistent regional model of Campania," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(1), pages 209-257, February.
    5. Ramona Pîrvu & Cristian Drăgan & Gheorghe Axinte & Sorin Dinulescu & Mihaela Lupăncescu & Andra Găină, 2019. "The Impact of the Implementation of Cohesion Policy on the Sustainable Development of EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Ross Brown & Ronald V Kalafsky & Suzanne Mawson & Lori Davies, 2020. "Shocks, uncertainty and regional resilience: The case of Brexit and Scottish SMEs," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(7), pages 655-675, November.
    7. Oliver Mas, 2018. "Brexit No Deal: The Budgetary Impact on CAP - Greece and the EU27," Working Papers 2018-4, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    8. Javier Martín-Uceda & Joan Vicente Rufí, 2021. "Territorial Development and Cross-Border Cooperation: A Review of the Consequences of European INTERREG Policies on the Spanish–French Border (2007–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Glückler Johannes & Wójcik Dariusz, 2023. "Seven Years of Brexit: Economic Geographies of Regional De- and Recoupling," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2-3), pages 67-75, August.
    10. Roberta Capello & Camilla Lenzi, 2018. "The dynamics of regional learning paradigms and trajectories," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 727-748, September.
    11. Andrei Sebastian Badea, 2011. "Perspectives On Improving Cohesion Policy Spending," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3(1), pages 6-12, March.
    12. Robyn Eversole & Megerssa Walo, 2020. "Leading and following in Australian regional development: Why governance matters," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 291-302, April.
    13. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Lewis Dijkstra, 2021. "Does Cohesion Policy reduce EU discontent and Euroscepticism?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 354-369, February.
    14. Marcin Wójcik & Karolina Dmochowska-Dudek & Paulina Tobiasz-Lis, 2021. "Boosting the Potential for GeoDesign : Digitalisation of the System of Spatial Planning as a Trigger for Smart Rural Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    15. repec:ehl:lserod:110767 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. David Burgalassi & Chiara Agnoletti & Leonardo Piccini, 2019. "Polycentricity and regional development: an analytical framework and some evidence from Italy," Discussion Papers 2019/249, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    17. Baumgart, Sabine & Danielzyk, Rainer & Dörry, Sabine & Hülz, Martina & Matthes, Jürgen & Orth, Martin & Schmidt-Seiwert, Volker & Schmitt, Peter & Wood, Gerald, 2021. "Brexit: Neue Herausforderungen für ein neues Europa," Positionspapier aus der ARL 120, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    18. John R. Moodie & Viktor Salenius & Michael Kull, 2022. "From impact assessments towards proactive citizen engagement in EU cohesion policy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 1113-1132, October.
    19. David Evers & Joost Tennekes, 2016. "Europe exposed: mapping the impacts of EU policies on spatial planning in the Netherlands," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1747-1765, October.
    20. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    21. Mark D. Partridge & Dan S. Rickman & M. Rose Olfert & Ying Tan, 2015. "When Spatial Equilibrium Fails: Is Place-Based Policy Second Best?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1303-1325, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:5:p:919-937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.