IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v38y2020i3p484-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deregulation as socio-spatial transformation: Dimensions and consequences of shifting governmentalities in the Danish construction industry

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Christoffer Gottlieb
  • Nicolaj Frederiksen

Abstract

The paper analyses main dimensions and consequences of deregulation in the Danish construction industry. Previous research has often conceptualized deregulation in terms of either the dismantling of states’ regulatory capacity or the layering of initiatives upon existing structures. Using Foucault’s concept of governmentality, we contribute further to this discussion by conceptualizing the process of deregulation as a socio-spatial transformation. This is a complex process of transformative change involving the opening and reconfiguration of institutional spaces. Drawing on an analysis of historical and current developments and changing modes of construction governance in Denmark, we show how the construction sector in the 1940–1960s was rendered governable by disciplinary power in order to achieve national modernization. We then illustrate how the developments since the early 1990s have been moulded in a neoliberal governmentality, with a focus on deregulation and the establishment of free markets. On the basis, we discuss the consequences of a shift in governmentalities, suggesting that new deliberative spaces in the form of mediating and interstitial institutions are likely to be in demand for in order to transgress the bounds of neoliberalism and ensure commitment for alternative development agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Christoffer Gottlieb & Nicolaj Frederiksen, 2020. "Deregulation as socio-spatial transformation: Dimensions and consequences of shifting governmentalities in the Danish construction industry," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(3), pages 484-502, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:38:y:2020:i:3:p:484-502
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654419868465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654419868465
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654419868465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2001. "NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT: The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 73-94, January.
    2. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic, 2006. "Marketization: From Intellectual Agenda to Global Policy Making," Post-Print hal-01891997, HAL.
    3. Anne E. Green & Michael Orton, 2012. "Policy Innovation in a Fragmented and Complex Multilevel Governance Context: Worklessness and the City Strategy in Great Britain," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 153-164, April.
    4. Grane Mikael Gregaard Rasmussen & Per Langaa Jensen & Stefan Christoffer Gottlieb, 2017. "Frames, agency and institutional change: the case of benchmarking in Danish construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 305-323, June.
    5. Jan Rotmans & Rene Kemp, 2008. "Detour Ahead: A Response to Shove and Walker about the Perilous Road of Transition Management," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(4), pages 1006-1012, April.
    6. Stefan Christoffer Gottlieb & Kim Haugb?lle, 2013. "Contradictions and collaboration: partnering in-between systems of production, values and interests," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 119-134, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesús Cambra-Berdún & Jesús Cambra-Fierro, 2006. "Considerations and implications on the necessity of increasing efficiency in the public education system: The new public management (NPM) and the market orientation as reference concepts," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 3(2), pages 41-58, December.
    2. David Monciardini & Guido Conaldi, 2019. "The European regulation of corporate social responsibility: The role of beneficiaries' intermediaries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 240-259, June.
    3. J. Rommel & J. Christiaens, 2007. "Blocking and Accepting Steering from Ministers and Departments. Coping Strategies of Agencies in Flanders," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/431, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    4. Nill, Jan & Kemp, Ren, 2009. "Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 668-680, May.
    5. Mehrpouya, Afshin & Samiolo, Rita, 2016. "Performance measurement in global governance: Ranking and the politics of variability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 12-31.
    6. Barton, John & Davies, Lloyd & Dooley, Ben & Foxon, Timothy J. & Galloway, Stuart & Hammond, Geoffrey P. & O’Grady, Áine & Robertson, Elizabeth & Thomson, Murray, 2018. "Transition pathways for a UK low-carbon electricity system: Comparing scenarios and technology implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2779-2790.
    7. Hennau Sofie, 2020. "The Relationship between Politics and Administration at the Flemish Local Level: Intermunicipal Differences Explained," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 141-160, December.
    8. Ian Bailey & Federico Caprotti, 2014. "The Green Economy: Functional Domains and Theoretical Directions of Enquiry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(8), pages 1797-1813, August.
    9. Akyel, Dominic, 2014. "Ökonomisierung und moralischer Wandel: Die Ausweitung von Marktbeziehungen als Prozess der moralischen Bewertung von Gütern," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Andrea Felicetti, 2021. "Systemic Unsustainability as a Threat to Democracy," Environmental Values, , vol. 30(4), pages 431-451, August.
    11. Claudia Pahl-Wostl, 2017. "An Evolutionary Perspective on Water Governance: From Understanding to Transformation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2917-2932, August.
    12. René Kemp & Jan Rotmans, 2009. "Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(4), pages 303-322, November.
    13. Vasilios P. Andrikopoulos & Amalia Α. Ifanti, 2020. "New Public Management and Governance: Quo Vadis?," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 430442-4304, December.
    14. Sebastian Billows & Sebastian Kohl & Fabien Tarissan, 2021. "Bureaucrats or Ideologues? EU Merger Control as Market‐centred Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 762-781, July.
    15. Joel Bothello & Afshin Mehrpouya, 2019. "Between regulatory field structuring and organizational roles: Intermediation in the field of sustainable urban development," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 177-196, June.
    16. Mauro, Sara Giovanna & Cinquini, Lino & Pianezzi, Daniela, 2021. "New Public Management between reality and illusion: Analysing the validity of performance-based budgeting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    17. Catherine Paradeise & Jean-Claude Thoenig, 2011. "Réformes et ordres universitaires locaux," Post-Print halshs-00638387, HAL.
    18. Svidroňová Mária Murray & Meričková Beáta Mikušová & Gondášová Lýdia, 2016. "E-procurement in Contracting-out of Public Goods and Services: Evidence from Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 57-71, June.
    19. Kuhmonen, Tuomas, 2017. "Exposing the attractors of evolving complex adaptive systems by utilising futures images: Milestones of the food sustainability journey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 214-225.
    20. Panagiota Xanthopoulou & Alexandros Sahinidis & Zorzeta Bakaki, 2022. "The Impact of Strong Cultures on Organisational Performance in Public Organisations: The Case of the Greek Public Administration," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:38:y:2020:i:3:p:484-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.