IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/1413.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ökonomisierung und moralischer Wandel: Die Ausweitung von Marktbeziehungen als Prozess der moralischen Bewertung von Gütern

Author

Listed:
  • Akyel, Dominic

Abstract

Die zeitgenössische Ökonomisierungstheorie hat moralischen und nachfrageseitigen Wandel als Einflussfaktor für Ökonomisierung bislang stark vernachlässigt. Sie erklärt den derzeitigen Ökonomisierungstrend mit Veränderungen der politischen und unternehmerischen Leitbilder sowie gewandelten wirtschaftlichen Kontextbedingungen. Ich zeige in diesem Artikel, dass bei der Entstehung von Ökonomisierungsprozessen auch moralische und nachfrageseitige Veränderungen eine Rolle spielen können. Um die moralische Dimension dieses Phänomens zu erschließen, wird Ökonomisierung dabei als ein Prozess der Legitimierung und Legalisierung des Austauschs von Gütern charakterisiert. Darauf aufbauend arbeite ich vier idealtypische Varianten der Ökonomisierung heraus, durch die sich insbesondere die Interaktion von staatlich initiierter Marktschaffung und Ökonomisierung als einem Prozess der Enttraditionalisierung wirtschaftlichen Handelns besser fassen lässt. Der hier skizzierte Ansatz trägt dazu bei, die vielfältigen Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Ökonomisierung und Modernisierung besser zu verstehen und ebnet so den Weg für eine stärker moralisch fundierte Soziologie der Ökonomisierung.

Suggested Citation

  • Akyel, Dominic, 2014. "Ökonomisierung und moralischer Wandel: Die Ausweitung von Marktbeziehungen als Prozess der moralischen Bewertung von Gütern," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:1413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/100090/1/792431103.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Streeck, Wolfgang & Mertens, Daniel, 2010. "Politik im Defizit: Austerität als fiskalpolitisches Regime," MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Alvin E. Roth, 2007. "Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(3), pages 37-58, Summer.
    3. Wehinger, Frank, 2011. "Illegale Märkte: Stand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung," MPIfG Working Paper 11/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic, 2006. "Marketization: From Intellectual Agenda to Global Policy Making," Post-Print hal-01891997, HAL.
    5. Fulcher, James, 2004. "Capitalism: A Very Short Introduction," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192802187.
    6. Daniel Friedman & Daniel McNeill, 2013. "Morals and Markets," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-1-137-33152-6, December.
    7. Beckert, Jens, 2005. "The Moral Embeddedness of Markets," MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Aspers, Patrik, 2009. "How are markets made?," MPIfG Working Paper 09/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    9. Satz, Debra, 2010. "Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195311594.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Dworczak & Scott Duke Kominers & Mohammad Akbarpour, 2021. "Redistribution Through Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1665-1698, July.
    2. Viola S. Ackfeld, 2020. "The Aversion to Monetary Incentives for Changing Behavior," Working Paper Series in Economics 100, University of Cologne, Department of Economics.
    3. Marina Della Giusta & Maria Laura Di Tommaso & Sarah Jewell & Francesca Bettio, 2021. "Quashing demand or changing clients? Evidence of criminalization of sex work in the United Kingdom," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 88(2), pages 527-544, October.
    4. Marie Daou & Alain Marciano, 2022. "Commodification: The traditional pro-market arguments," Post-Print hal-03876907, HAL.
    5. Sandro Ambuehl & Muriel Niederle & Alvin E. Roth, 2015. "More Money, More Problems? Can High Pay Be Coercive and Repugnant?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 357-360, May.
    6. Yew-Kwang NG, 2016. "Extending Economic Analysis to Analyze Policy Issues More Broadly," Economic Growth Centre Working Paper Series 1609, Nanyang Technological University, School of Social Sciences, Economic Growth Centre.
    7. Chen, Daniel L., 2016. "Markets, Morality, and Economic Growth: Competition Affects Utilitarian Judgment," IAST Working Papers 16-45, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    8. Julio J. Elías & Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis, 2019. "Paying for Kidneys? A Randomized Survey and Choice Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2855-2888, August.
    9. Shengwu Li, 2017. "Ethics and market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 705-720.
    10. Jason Monios, 2023. "The Moral Limits of Market-Based Mechanisms: An Application to the International Maritime Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 283-299, October.
    11. Katharina Huesmann & Achim Wambach, 2015. "Constraints on Matching Markets Based on Moral Concerns," CESifo Working Paper Series 5356, CESifo.
    12. Kevin Leportier, 2024. "Altruism and the Simple Argument for Markets," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04571499, HAL.
    13. Nicola Lacetera, 2016. "Incentives and Ethics in the Economics of Body Parts," NBER Working Papers 22673, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Karen Evelyn Hauge & Snorre Kverndokk & Andreas Lange, 2024. "On the opposition to market institutions on moral grounds," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    15. Philip J Held & Frank McCormick & Glenn M Chertow & Thomas G Peters & John P Roberts, 2018. "Would government compensation of living kidney donors exploit the poor? An empirical analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Beckert, Jens & Wehinger, Frank, 2011. "In the shadow illegal markets and economic sociology," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Sandro Ambuehl, 2017. "An Offer You Can't Refuse? Testing Undue Inducement," CESifo Working Paper Series 6296, CESifo.
    18. Pierre Januard, 2022. "At the Boundaries of the Trading Sphere: The Appearance of the 'Just Price' in Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on the Sentences," Working Papers halshs-03658417, HAL.
    19. Muriel Niederle & Alvin E. Roth, 2009. "The Effects of a Centralized Clearinghouse on Job Placement, Wages, and Hiring Practices," NBER Chapters, in: Studies of Labor Market Intermediation, pages 235-271, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Lacetera, Nicola & Macis, Mario, 2008. "Motivating Altruism: A Field Study," IZA Discussion Papers 3770, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:1413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.