IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v55y2023i8p2009-2030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusive growth, public transit infrastructure investments and neighbourhood trajectories of inequality in Montreal

Author

Listed:
  • Sébastien Breau

    (Department of Geography, 5620McGill University, Canada)

  • Megan Wylie

    (Department of Geography, McGill University, Canada; Office of Energy Transition, 6314Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada)

  • Kevin Manaugh

    (Department of Geography and Bieler School of Environment, 5620McGill University, Canada)

  • Samantha Carr

    (Department of Geography, 5620McGill University, Canada)

Abstract

Investing in accessible, affordable and sustainable modes of transportation is increasingly seen as an important policy tool for fostering the development of more inclusive cities and combating the rise in inequality. In this article, we review how the concept of inclusive growth has gained traction at the local level framed within a discourse of building more equitable and sustainable cities with a particular emphasis on transportation infrastructure projects as a way of operationalizing the concept as a policy tool. Using Montreal as a case study, we then proceed to evaluate two competing proposals for major public transit infrastructure projects (the Pink line and the REM Phase II) to see if one may potentially offer more inclusive outcomes in terms of transit access and mobility. We do so by first examining changes in the spatial configurations of neighbourhood income disparities in the city between 1981 and 2016. After identifying a pattern of growing spatial polarization between higher- and lower-income neighbourhoods, we use a buffer analysis of transit stations to assess which of the two proposed transit infrastructure projects is best positioned to curb the growth of neighbourhood disparities. Our results suggest the proposed Pink line project provides more coverage in terms of accessibility and connecting economically disadvantaged neighbourhoods from Montreal Nord to Lachine with the downtown core.

Suggested Citation

  • Sébastien Breau & Megan Wylie & Kevin Manaugh & Samantha Carr, 2023. "Inclusive growth, public transit infrastructure investments and neighbourhood trajectories of inequality in Montreal," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 2009-2030, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:8:p:2009-2030
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X231162091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X231162091
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X231162091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kassoum Ayouba & Julie Le Gallo & Andrés Vallone, 2020. "Beyond GDP: an analysis of the socio-economic diversity of European regions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(9), pages 1010-1029, February.
    2. Ilan Wiesel & Fanqi Liu, 2021. "Conceptualising modes of redistribution in public urban infrastructure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1561-1580, June.
    3. Picot, Garnett & Pyper, Wendy & Myles, John, 2000. "Neighbourhood Inequality in Canadian Cities," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 2000160e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    4. Pernia, Ernesto & Kakwani, Nanak, 2000. "What is Pro-poor Growth?," MPRA Paper 104987, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Ceri Hughes & Ruth Lupton, 2021. "Understanding inclusive growth at local level: changing patterns and types of neighbourhood disadvantage in three English city-regions," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(1), pages 141-156.
    6. David Castells‐Quintana & Vicente Royuela & Paolo Veneri, 2020. "Inequality and city size: An analysis for OECD functional urban areas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(4), pages 1045-1064, August.
    7. Emil Evenhuis & Neil Lee & Ron Martin & Peter Tyler, 2021. "Rethinking the political economy of place: challenges of productivity and inclusion," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(1), pages 3-24.
    8. Mizuki Kawabata, 2003. "Job Access and Employment among Low-Skilled Autoless Workers in US Metropolitan Areas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(9), pages 1651-1668, September.
    9. Neil Lee, 2019. "Inclusive Growth in cities: a sympathetic critique," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 424-434, March.
    10. Wen-Hao Chen & John Myles & Garnett Picot, 2012. "Why Have Poorer Neighbourhoods Stagnated Economically while the Richer Have Flourished? Neighbourhood Income Inequality in Canadian Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(4), pages 877-896, March.
    11. Sébastien Breau & Michael Shin & Nick Burkhart, 2018. "Pulling apart: new perspectives on the spatial dimensions of neighbourhood income disparities in Canadian cities," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 2010. "Economic Geographers and the Limelight: Institutions and Policy in the World Development Report 2009," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 86(4), pages 361-370, October.
    13. Nanak Kakwani & Ernesto M. Pernia, 2000. "What is Pro-poor Growth?," Asian Development Review (ADR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 1-16.
    14. Elizabeth C. Delmelle & Isabelle Nilsson & Alexander Bryant, 2021. "Investigating Transit-Induced Displacement Using Eviction Data," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 326-341, March.
    15. Fiaschi, Davide & Gianmoena, Lisa & Parenti, Angela, 2018. "Spatial club dynamics in European regions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 115-130.
    16. David Waite & Bruce Whyte & Jill Muirie, 2020. "From an agreeable policy label to a practical policy framework: inclusive growth in city-regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(9), pages 1812-1835, September.
    17. Ahmed El-Geneidy & Michael Grimsrud & Rania Wasfi & Paul Tétreault & Julien Surprenant-Legault, 2014. "New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 193-210, January.
    18. World Bank, 2009. "Geography in Motion: World Development Report 2009 (excerpt)," Transnational Corporations Review, Ottawa United Learning Academy, vol. 1(3), pages 40-46, September.
    19. Lucas, Karen, 2012. "Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 105-113.
    20. Rafael H. M. Pereira & Tim Schwanen & David Banister, 2017. "Distributive justice and equity in transportation," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 170-191, March.
    21. Pereira, Rafael H.M., 2019. "Future accessibility impacts of transport policy scenarios: Equity and sensitivity to travel time thresholds for Bus Rapid Transit expansion in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 321-332.
    22. David Waite & Graeme Roy, 2022. "The promises and pitfalls of operationalizing inclusive growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(11), pages 1989-2000, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Serra, Bernardo & Oliveira, Gabriel T. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2020. "Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Zhu, Le & Shi, Fei, 2022. "Spatial and social inequalities of job accessibility in Kunshan city, China: Application of the Amap API and mobile phone signaling data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2020. "Suburbanization of transport poverty," SocArXiv hkpfj, Center for Open Science.
    4. Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2019. "Sizing up transport poverty: A national scale accounting of low-income households suffering from inaccessibility in Canada, and what to do about it," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 214-223.
    5. Mwesigwa, Leonard & Yin, Zehui & Farber, Steven, 2024. "Evaluating the level of access and equity of the bus rapid transit (BRT) system: The case of Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Richard Crisp & David Waite & Anne Green & Ceri Hughes & Ruth Lupton & Danny MacKinnon & Andy Pike, 2024. "‘Beyond GDP’ in cities: Assessing alternative approaches to urban economic development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1209-1229, May.
    7. Emil Evenhuis & Neil Lee & Ron Martin & Peter Tyler, 2021. "Rethinking the political economy of place: challenges of productivity and inclusion," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(1), pages 3-24.
    8. Bjørnson Lunke, Erik, 2023. "Accessibility in a multi-ethnic city: Residential trade-offs among first-time parents," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    9. Edward Randal & Caroline Shaw & Alistair Woodward & Philippa Howden-Chapman & Alex Macmillan & Jamie Hosking & Ralph Chapman & Andrew M. Waa & Michael Keall, 2020. "Fairness in Transport Policy: A New Approach to Applying Distributive Justice Theories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2019. "Sizing up transport poverty: A national scale accounting of low-income households suffering from inaccessibility in Canada, and what to do about it," SocArXiv ua2gj, Center for Open Science.
    11. Lee, Neil, 2023. "Inclusive innovation in cities: from buzzword to policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117818, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Allen, Jeff & Higgins, Christopher D. & Silver, Daniel & Farber, Steven, 2023. "Are low-income residents disproportionately moving away from transit?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Lou, Jiehong & Shen, Xingchi & Niemeier, Deb, 2020. "Are stay-at-home orders more difficult to follow for low-income groups?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Kraay, Aart, 2004. "When is growth pro-poor? Cross-country evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3225, The World Bank.
    15. Sophie Webber, 2015. "Randomising Development: Geography, Economics and the Search for Scientific Rigour," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(1), pages 36-52, February.
    16. Lin, Joanne Yuh-Jye & Jenelius, Erik & Cebecauer, Matej & Rubensson, Isak & Chen, Cynthia, 2023. "The equity of public transport crowding exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    17. Touhami Abdelkhalek & Dorothee Boccanfuso, 2023. "Is the Moroccan Fiscal System Progressive ? A Shapley Decomposition," Policy briefs on Economic Trends and Policies 2342, Policy Center for the New South.
    18. Peter Warr, 2005. "Pro‐poor Growth," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Luz, Gregório & Barboza, Matheus H.C. & Portugal, Licinio & Giannotti, Mariana & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Does better accessibility help to reduce social exclusion? Evidence from the city of São Paulo, Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 186-217.
    20. Ryan, Jean & Martens, Karel, 2023. "Defining and implementing a sufficient level of accessibility: What’s stopping us?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:8:p:2009-2030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.