IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v49y2017i8p1743-1761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neoliberal urbanism, public space, and the greening of the growth machine: New York City’s High Line park

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Lang
  • Julia Rothenberg

Abstract

In post-industrial cities throughout the world abandoned railroads, demolished freeways, disused canals, and other derelict industrial ruins are being transformed into ecologically inspired and aesthetically designed leisure, consumption, and tourist spaces based upon the principles of Landscape Urbanism and ideas about sustainable park design. New York City’s High Line is one example of this growing trend. Sustainable parks like the High Line claim to provide economic, ecological, and equity benefits associated with the 3 Es of sustainability. Our research on the development of New York City’s High Line suggests that while the High Line meets the economic piece of the sustainability triad with its promise of generating growth, its success in terms of the ecological dimension of sustainability is unclear. More troubling is the High Line’s neglect of the social equity component of the discourse of sustainability. Our work brings together several key arguments in the critical literature on urban sustainability to examine how structural constraints associated with creating post-industrial ecological spaces in a climate of neoliberal urbanization play out in the paradigmatic case of the High Line.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Lang & Julia Rothenberg, 2017. "Neoliberal urbanism, public space, and the greening of the growth machine: New York City’s High Line park," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1743-1761, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:49:y:2017:i:8:p:1743-1761
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X16677969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X16677969
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X16677969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harvey Molotch & Mark Treskon, 2009. "Changing Art: SoHo, Chelsea and the Dynamic Geography of Galleries in New York City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 517-541, June.
    2. Ian Hamilton Thompson, 2012. "Ten Tenets and Six Questions for Landscape Urbanism," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 7-26.
    3. Harold A. Perkins, 2013. "Consent to Neoliberal Hegemony through Coercive Urban Environmental Governance," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 311-327, January.
    4. Claudio de Magalhaes & Matthew Carmona, 2009. "Dimensions and models of contemporary public space management in England," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 111-129.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2019. "Edible urbanism 5.0," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Koenraad Danneels, 2023. "THE POLITICS OF URBAN ECOLOGY: Paul Duvigneaud and the Rise of Ecological Urbanism in Brussels during the 1970s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 792-808, September.
    3. Malini Ranganathan, 2014. "Paying for Pipes, Claiming Citizenship: Political Agency and Water Reforms at the Urban Periphery," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 590-608, March.
    4. Pappalepore, Ilaria & Duignan, Michael B., 2016. "The London 2012 cultural programme: A consideration of Olympic impacts and legacies for small creative organisations in east London," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 344-355.
    5. Ricardo Martín & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Bridging the Gap between Landscape and Management within Marinas: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Vanessa Mathews, 2014. "Incoherence and Tension in Culture-Led Redevelopment," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1019-1036, May.
    7. Joanna P. Ganning, 2016. "Arts Stability and Growth Amid Redevelopment in U.S. Shrinking Cities’ Downtowns," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(3), pages 239-251, August.
    8. Jinvo Nam & Nicola Dempsey, 2018. "Community Food Growing in Parks? Assessing the Acceptability and Feasibility in Sheffield, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Jenny Schuetz & Richard K. Green, 2014. "Is The Art Market More Bourgeois Than Bohemian?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 273-303, March.
    10. Ricardo Martín & Víctor Yepes, 2022. "Assessing the Relationship between Landscape and Management within Marinas: The Managers’ Perception," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Krzysztofik Robert & Dymitrow Mirek & Biegańska Jadwiga & Senetra Adam & Gavriilidou Eleftheria & Nadolu Bogdan & Kantor-Pietraga Iwona & Grzelak-Kostulska Elżbieta & Oureilidou Eleni & Luches Daniel , 2017. "Landscapes with different logics: A physicalistic approach to semantic conflicts in spatial planning," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 36(4), pages 29-45, December.
    12. Joaquim Rius Ulldemolins, 2014. "Culture and authenticity in urban regeneration processes: Place branding in central Barcelona," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(14), pages 3026-3045, November.
    13. Jinvo Nam & Nicola Dempsey, 2019. "Understanding Stakeholder Perceptions of Acceptability and Feasibility of Formal and Informal Planting in Sheffield’s District Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Schuetz, Jenny, 2014. "Do art galleries stimulate redevelopment?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 59-72.
    15. Lai, Lawrence W.C. & Ho, Daniel C.W. & Chau, K.W. & Yu, Esther Y.T. & Lam, Cindy L.K. & Leung, Nixon T.H. & Davies, Stephen N.G., 2021. "Property rights & the perceived health contribution of public open space in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Elena-Lavinia Ciuculescu & Florin-Alexandru Luca, 2024. "How Can Cities Build Their Brand through Arts and Culture? An Analysis of ECoC Bidbooks from 2020 to 2026," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Álvaro Mercado & Geoffrey Grulois, 2020. "On-Drawing South American Extent: Geo-Poetic Mapping Palimpsest in the Travesías de Amereida," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 205-217.
    18. Minjin Lee & Hangil Kim & SangHyun Cheon, 2021. "A Network Approach to Revealing Dynamic Succession Processes of Urban Land Use and User Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Jansson Johan, 2014. "Temporary events and spaces in the Swedish primary art market," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 58(1), pages 202-215, October.
    20. Meghan Ashlin Rich & William Tsitsos, 2016. "Avoiding the ‘SoHo Effect’ in Baltimore: Neighborhood Revitalization and Arts and Entertainment Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 736-756, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:49:y:2017:i:8:p:1743-1761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.