IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v24y2023i2p327-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A window of opportunity? The relevance of the rotating European Union presidency in the public eye

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Eisele

    (Department of Communication, 27258University of Vienna, Austria; Department of Communication, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Tobias Heidenreich

    (28422Berlin Social Science Centre, Germany)

  • Nina Kriegler

    (Department of Communication, 27258University of Vienna, Austria)

  • Pamina Syed Ali

    (Department of Communication and Media Research, 27217University of Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Hajo G. Boomgaarden

    (Department of Communication, 27258University of Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

The rotating EU presidency's relevance for EU politics has decreased since the introduction of a permanent council president. However, news salience and framing of the own government acting as the EU presidency can amplify publicity for EU affairs. We, therefore, evaluate the visibility and framing of the EU presidency in 12 Austrian newspapers for 2009–2019. We conduct an automated text analysis of 22 presidencies over 11 years, testing several hypotheses statistically, and qualify results via manually coded frames of the Austrian EU presidency in 2018. The results confirm the crucial importance of the domestication of EU politics, underscoring the potential of the presidency to serve as a window of opportunity for public debate. We discuss our findings with reference to the EU's democratic deficit.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Eisele & Tobias Heidenreich & Nina Kriegler & Pamina Syed Ali & Hajo G. Boomgaarden, 2023. "A window of opportunity? The relevance of the rotating European Union presidency in the public eye," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(2), pages 327-347, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:24:y:2023:i:2:p:327-347
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165221142504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165221142504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165221142504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heidenreich, Tobias & Eisele, Olga & Watanabe, Kohei & Boomgaarden, Hajo G., 2022. "Exploring Engagement With EU News on Facebook: The Influence of Content Characteristics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 121-132.
    2. Adriaan Schout & Sophie Vanhoonacker, 2006. "Evaluating Presidencies of the Council of the EU: Revisiting Nice," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1051-1077, December.
    3. Pieter de Wilde & Astrid Rasch & Michael Bossetta, 2022. "Analyzing Citizen Engagement With European Politics on Social Media," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 90-96.
    4. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i::p:1051-1077 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Katrin Auel & Olga Eisele & Lucy Kinski, 2018. "What Happens in Parliament Stays in Parliament? Newspaper Coverage of National Parliaments in EU Affairs," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 628-645, April.
    6. Tobias Heidenreich & Olga Eisele & Kohei Watanabe & Hajo G. Boomgaarden, 2022. "Exploring Engagement With EU News on Facebook: The Influence of Content Characteristics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 121-132.
    7. van Gruisen, Philippe & Crombez, Christophe, 2021. "The Commission and the Council Presidency in the European Union: Strategic interactions and legislative powers," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Anamaria Dutceac Segesten & Michael Bossetta, 2019. "Can Euroscepticism Contribute to a European Public Sphere? The Europeanization of Media Discourses on Euroscepticism across Six Countries," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 1051-1070, September.
    9. Hanno Degner & Dirk Leuffen, 2019. "Franco-German cooperation and the rescuing of the Eurozone," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 89-108, March.
    10. Lucia Quaglia & Edward Moxon‐Browne, 2006. "What Makes a Good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland Compared," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 349-368, June.
    11. Adriaan Schout, 2017. "The Dutch EU Presidency: The Continuing Relevance of the Rotating Presidency in a Political Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55, pages 54-63, September.
    12. van Gruisen, Philippe & Vangerven, Pieterjan & Crombez, Christophe, 2019. "Voting Behavior in the Council of the European Union: The Effect of the Trio Presidency," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 489-504, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eisele, Olga & Heidenreich, Tobias & Kriegler, Nina & Syed Ali, Pamina & Boomgaarden, Hajo G., 2022. "A window of opportunity? The relevance of the rotating European Union presidency in the public eye," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-21.
    2. Svetličič Marjan & Cerjak Kira, 2015. "Small Countries’ EU Council Presidency and the Realisation of their National Interests: The Case of Slovenia," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(74), pages 5-39, December.
    3. Austė Vaznonytė, 2020. "The rotating Presidency of the Council of the EU – Still an agenda-setter?," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 497-518, September.
    4. Sebastian Blesse & Pierre C Boyer & Friedrich Heinemann & Eckhard Janeba & Anasuya Raj, 2019. "European Monetary Union reform preferences of French and German parliamentarians," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 406-424, September.
    5. Jeffry Frieden & Stefanie Walter, 2019. "Analyzing inter-state negotiations in the Eurozone crisis and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 134-151, March.
    6. Anna-Lena Högenauer, 2021. "Scrutiny or Complacency? Banking Union in the Bundestag and the Assemblée Nationale," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 219-229.
    7. Magnus Lundgren & Stefanie Bailer & Lisa M Dellmuth & Jonas Tallberg & Silvana Târlea, 2019. "Bargaining success in the reform of the Eurozone," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 65-88, March.
    8. Stefan Wallaschek & Kavyanjali Kaushik & Monika Verbalyte & Aleksandra Sojka & Giuliana Sorci & Hans-Jörg Trenz & Monika Eigmüller, 2022. "Same Same but Different? Gender Politics and (Trans-)National Value Contestation in Europe on Twitter," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 146-160.
    9. Anna-Lena Högenauer, 2016. "Luxembourg's EU Council Presidency: Adapting Routines to New Circumstances," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54, pages 91-100, September.
    10. Daniel Finke & Stefanie Bailer, 2019. "Crisis bargaining in the European Union: Formal rules or market pressure?," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 109-133, March.
    11. Carlos Mendez & Fernando Mendez & Vasiliki Triga & Juan Miguel Carrascosa, 2020. "EU Cohesion Policy under the Media Spotlight: Exploring Territorial and Temporal Patterns in News Coverage and Tone," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1034-1055, July.
    12. James P Cross & AustÄ— VaznonytÄ—, 2020. "Can we do what we say we will do? Issue salience, government effectiveness, and the legislative efficiency of Council Presidencies," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(4), pages 657-679, December.
    13. Silvana Târlea & Stefanie Bailer & Hanno Degner & Lisa M Dellmuth & Dirk Leuffen & Magnus Lundgren & Jonas Tallberg & Fabio Wasserfallen, 2019. "Explaining governmental preferences on Economic and Monetary Union Reform," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 24-44, March.
    14. Maurizio Carbone, 2015. "Beyond the Telemachus complex: courses, discourses and the 2014 Italian Presidency of the Council of the European Union-super-," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53, pages 83-92, September.
    15. Christophe Crombez & Pieterjan Vangerven & Philippe van Gruisen, 2023. "Preferences and Institutions in European (Dis)Integration," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 5-15.
    16. Federica Genovese & Gerald Schneider, 2020. "Smoke with fire: Financial crises and the demand for parliamentary oversight in the European Union," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 633-665, July.
    17. Philippe van Gruisen & Martijn Huysmans, 2020. "The Early Warning System and policymaking in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 451-473, September.
    18. Niels Gheyle, 2019. "Conceptualizing the Parliamentarization and Politicization of European Policies," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 227-236.
    19. Brigitte Pircher & Mike Farjam, 2021. "Oppositional voting in the Council of the EU between 2010 and 2019: Evidence for differentiated politicisation," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 472-494, September.
    20. Helena Seibicke & Asimina Michailidou, 2022. "The Challenges of Reconstructing Citizen-Driven EU Contestation in the Digital Media Sphere," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 97-107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:24:y:2023:i:2:p:327-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.