IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/busper/v5y2017i2p151-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Response to Brand Gender Bending: An Integrated Review and Future Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Namrata Sandhu

Abstract

In the postmodern era, many marketers have disturbed the strict gender discipline traditionally associated with gendered brands. Marketers are redoing their gender work by blurring the stark distinction between masculine and feminine brands. New consumption ideologies are developing that transcend the gendered meanings of brands and encourage men and women to infiltrate brands traditionally associated with the opposite gender. “Unisex†is emerging as the byword. This review convenes the phenomenological consumer responses to brand gender bending. It specifically highlights the contrast between the ways in which men and women react to dilution/revision of the gender identity meanings of their brands. This article also underscores the ethnographic, sociological, psychological, and anthropological reasons that justify these reactions. Based on the review and scientific understanding of the long-standing research, this article proposes a conceptual framework that exhibits the determinants that govern consumer responses to brand gender bending. Future researchers may empirically examine the validity of the framework. The practical implications of the article focus on providing suggestions to marketers engaged in the design of cross-gender brand extension strategies. It is believed that this article adds a fresh multidisciplinary perspective to the exiting literature on brand gender bending.

Suggested Citation

  • Namrata Sandhu, 2017. "Consumer Response to Brand Gender Bending: An Integrated Review and Future Research Agenda," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 5(2), pages 151-166, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:5:y:2017:i:2:p:151-166
    DOI: 10.1177/2278533717692917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2278533717692917
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2278533717692917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent Larivière & Yves Gingras, 2010. "On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 126-131, January.
    2. Man Mohan Siddh & Gunjan Soni & Rakesh Jain, 2015. "Perishable food supply chain quality (PFSCQ)," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 292-313, November.
    3. Vincent Larivière & Yves Gingras, 2010. "On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 126-131, January.
    4. Avery, Jill, 2012. "Defending the markers of masculinity: Consumer resistance to brand gender-bending," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 322-336.
    5. Nakata, Cheryl & Huang, Yili, 2005. "Progress and promise: the last decade of international marketing research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 611-618, May.
    6. Thompson, Craig J & Haytko, Diana L, 1997. "Speaking of Fashion: Consumers' Uses of Fashion Discourses and the Appropriation of Countervailing Cultural Meanings," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(1), pages 15-42, June.
    7. Park, C Whan & Milberg, Sandra & Lawson, Robert, 1991. "Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 185-193, September.
    8. Wallendorf, Melanie & Arnould, Eric J, 1991. ""We Gather Together": Consumption Rituals of Thanksgiving Day," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 13-31, June.
    9. Sandor Czellar, 2003. "Consumer attitude toward brand extensions : An Integrative Model and Research Propositions," Post-Print hal-00480357, HAL.
    10. Michael Humphreys & Andrew D. Brown, 2002. "Dress and Identity: A Turkish Case Study," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(7), pages 927-952, November.
    11. Tuncay, Linda & Otnes, Cele C., 2008. "The Use of Persuasion Management Strategies by Identity-Vulnerable Consumers: The Case of Urban Heterosexual Male Shoppers," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(4), pages 487-499.
    12. Kates, Steven M, 2002. "The Protean Quality of Subcultural Consumption: An Ethnographic Account of Gay Consumers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 383-399, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Namrata Sandhu, 2019. "Fueling Gender Stereotypes: A Content Analysis of Automobile Advertisements," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 7(2), pages 163-178, July.
    2. Namrata Sandhu & Dilpreet Singh, 2017. "Gender Contamination in Indian Automobile Advertisements," Paradigm, , vol. 21(2), pages 139-155, December.
    3. Namrata Sandhu, 2018. "Impact of Gender Cues in Advertisements on Perceived Gender Identity Meanings of the Advertised Product," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 7(4), pages 293-303, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avery, Jill, 2012. "Defending the markers of masculinity: Consumer resistance to brand gender-bending," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 322-336.
    2. Yuen, Tsunwai Wesley & Nieroda, Marzena & He, Hongwei & Park, Yunseul, 2021. "Can dissimilarity in product category be an opportunity for cross-gender brand extension?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 348-357.
    3. Hackett, Edward J. & Leahey, Erin & Parker, John N. & Rafols, Ismael & Hampton, Stephanie E. & Corte, Ugo & Chavarro, Diego & Drake, John M. & Penders, Bart & Sheble, Laura & Vermeulen, Niki & Vision,, 2021. "Do synthesis centers synthesize? A semantic analysis of topical diversity in research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    4. Xian Li & Ronald Rousseau & Liming Liang & Fangjie Xi & Yushuang Lü & Yifan Yuan & Xiaojun Hu, 2022. "Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 2105-2122, April.
    5. Rafols, Ismael & Leydesdorff, Loet & O’Hare, Alice & Nightingale, Paul & Stirling, Andy, 2012. "How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1262-1282.
    6. Zheng Yan & Wenqian Robertson & Yaosheng Lou & Tom W. Robertson & Sung Yong Park, 2021. "Finding leading scholars in mobile phone behavior: a mixed-method analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9499-9517, December.
    7. van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Hessels, Laurens K., 2011. "Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 463-472, April.
    8. Lawson, Cornelia & Soós,Sándor, 2014. "A Thematic Mobility Measure for Econometric Analysis," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201408, University of Turin.
    9. Marco Guerzoni & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2014. "Music consumption at the dawn of the music industry: the rise of a cultural fad," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(2), pages 145-171, May.
    10. E. Bacchiega & M. Colucci & M. Magnani, 2019. "What goes around, comes around: Reciprocal effects and double-sided moral hazard in the choice of brand licensing," Working Papers wp1136, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    11. Xingchen Li & Qiang Wu & Yuanyuan Liu, 2017. "A quantitative analysis of researcher citation personal display considering disciplinary differences and influence factors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1093-1112, November.
    12. Nathalie Veg-Sala & Elyette Roux, 2018. "Cross-gender extension potential of luxury brands: a semiotic analysis," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(5), pages 436-448, September.
    13. Fuyuki Yoshikane & Yutaka Suzuki & Keita Tsuji, 2012. "Analysis of the relationship between citation frequency of patents and diversity of their backward citations for Japanese patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 721-733, September.
    14. Juana Paul Moiwo & Fulu Tao, 2013. "The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 1031-1050, June.
    15. Reindert K. Buter & Ed. C. M. Noyons & Anthony F. J. Raan, 2011. "Searching for converging research using field to field citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(2), pages 325-338, February.
    16. Jonathan M. Levitt & Mike Thelwall, 2016. "Long term productivity and collaboration in information science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1103-1117, September.
    17. Didegah, Fereshteh & Thelwall, Mike, 2013. "Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 861-873.
    18. Shang, Yuanyuan & Sivertsen, Gunnar & Cao, Zhe & Zhang, Lin, 2021. "Gender differences in research focused on the Sustainable Development Goal of Gender Equality," SocArXiv 3fapz, Center for Open Science.
    19. Feng Shi & James Evans, 2023. "Surprising combinations of research contents and contexts are related to impact and emerge with scientific outsiders from distant disciplines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Alfonso Ávila-Robinson & Cristian Mejia & Shintaro Sengoku, 2021. "Are bibliometric measures consistent with scientists’ perceptions? The case of interdisciplinarity in research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7477-7502, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:5:y:2017:i:2:p:151-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.