IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v12y1987i2p159-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Perspectives on the Management of Infor Mation Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Trevor C. Bailey

    (Department of Mathematical Statistics and Operations Research, Streatham Court, University of Exeter, Exeter EX 44 PU, U.K.)

Abstract

Recently a number of articles have drawn attention to management problems associated with growth in the use of infor Mation technology. Indeed, several authors argue that we have entered an era when the most difficult computer problems confronting organisations are managerial, rather than technical. Certainly, the technology is pervasive, and the issues involved in its management are wide-ranging and complex. This paper reviews the recent literature and identifies nine recurrent themes that tend to dominate much of the discussion. Thereby it defines a set of dimensions under which contemporary management of infor Mation technology must operate and attempts to clarify the constraints and conflicts which it must address.

Suggested Citation

  • Trevor C. Bailey, 1987. "Some Perspectives on the Management of Infor Mation Technology," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 12(2), pages 159-183, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:12:y:1987:i:2:p:159-183
    DOI: 10.1177/031289628701200202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289628701200202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/031289628701200202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rockart, John F. (John Fralick) & Crescenzi, Adam D., 1984. "Engaging top management in information planning and development : a case study," Working papers no. 115. Working paper (S, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    2. Quillard, Judith A., 1983. "A study of corporate use of personal computers," Working papers no. 109. Working paper (S, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. James G. March, 1978. "Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 9(2), pages 587-608, Autumn.
    4. J. F. Rockart & M. S. Scott Morton, 1984. "Implications of Changes in Information Technology for Corporate Strategy," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 84-95, February.
    5. Rockart, John F. (John Fralick) & Flannery, Lauren S., 1981. "The management of end user computing," Working papers no. 76. Working paper (Sl, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. Rockart, John F. (John Fralick), 1982. "The changing role of the information systems executive : a critical success factors perspective," Working papers 1297-82. Report (Alfred P, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thunström, Linda & Nordström, Jonas & Shogren, Jason F., 2015. "Certainty and overconfidence in future preferences for food," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 101-113.
    2. Freeman, Steven F., 1997. "Good decisions : reconciling human rationality, evolution, and ethics," Working papers WP 3962-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. Venugopal Gopalakrishna-Remani & Robert Paul Jones & Kerri M. Camp, 2019. "Levels of EMR Adoption in U.S. Hospitals: An Empirical Examination of Absorptive Capacity, Institutional Pressures, Top Management Beliefs, and Participation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1325-1344, December.
    4. van Riel, A.C.R. & Lievens, A., 2003. "New service development in high tech sectors: a decision making perspective," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    5. Pascale Amans & Sylvie Rascol-Boutard, 2006. "Controlling Complex Organizations on the Basis of an Operational Performance Measure," Post-Print hal-01659071, HAL.
    6. Moore, Don A., 1999. "Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences, ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 146-165, May.
    7. Rockart, John F. (John Fralick), 1982. "The changing role of the information systems executive : a critical success factors perspective," Working papers 1297-82. Report (Alfred P, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    8. Kieran Donaghy, 2011. "Models of travel demand with endogenous preference change and heterogeneous agents," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 17-30, March.
    9. Alvesson, Mats & Sveningsson, Stefan, 2011. "Management is the solution: Now what was the problem? On the fragile basis for managerialism," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 349-361.
    10. Sérgio Domingues & Dejan Zlatkovic, 2015. "Renegotiating PPP Contracts: Reinforcing the 'P' in Partnership," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 204-225, March.
    11. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez, 2022. "The Influence of Knowledge on Managing Risk for the Success in Complex Construction Projects: The IPMA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    12. Guercini, Simone & Milanesi, Matilde, 2020. "Heuristics in international business: A systematic literature review and directions for future research," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4).
    13. Mohammad Reza Nikbakht & Mehrdad Sadr Ara, 2016. "A new experimental model for profit maximization," Journal of Economic and Financial Studies (JEFS), LAR Center Press, vol. 4(3), pages 45-52, June.
    14. Stine Labes & Nicolai Hanner & Ruediger Zarnekow, 2017. "Successful Business Model Types of Cloud Providers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(4), pages 223-233, August.
    15. Alan B. Krueger & Daniel Kahneman & David Schkade & Norbert Schwarz & Arthur A. Stone, 2009. "National Time Accounting: The Currency of Life," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring the Subjective Well-Being of Nations: National Accounts of Time Use and Well-Being, pages 9-86, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Swait, Joffre & Adamowicz, Wiktor, 2001. "Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 141-167, November.
    17. Wayne DeSarbo & Duncan Fong & John Liechty & Jennifer Coupland, 2005. "Evolutionary preference/utility functions: A dynamic perspective," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 179-202, March.
    18. Judith Banda-Guzman & Alejandra Lopez-Salazar, 2014. "Success Factors in Pepper Greenhouses - Case Study: Queretaro, Mexico," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 96-107, May.
    19. Mark Heitmann & Andreas Herrmann, 2007. "Die Zufriedenheit mit dem Entscheidungsprozess als Determinante der Kundenbindung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 530-566, August.
    20. Chu, P. C. & Spires, Eric E. & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 1999. "Cross-Cultural Differences in Choice Behavior and Use of Decision Aids: A Comparison of Japan and the United States," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 147-170, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    INfor MATION TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:12:y:1987:i:2:p:159-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.