IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mrpase/v3y2011i3p21-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Importance Of Service Life Planning In Sustainable Architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Silverio HERNANDEZ-MORENO

    (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Cerro de Coatepec s/no, Ciudad Universitaria, C. P. 50100,Toluca, Estado de México, México)

Abstract

In most of the architecture and construction firms service life planning is not considered in the process of architectural design, and neither is life cycle assessment; and even on occasions, sustainable design is neither taken into account in the processes of building creation because it is complex and specialists are needed to implement it. The objective of the present document is to approach this topic from the sustainable design viewpoint and to regard it accordingly, analyzing several concepts related to service life and durability of the building and the strategies the architect or constructor must follow in order to create totally of partially sustainable buildings, which prolong its service life in optimal conditions of performance, functionality and comfort, thus decreasing costs and environmental impacts during its service life. It is concluded that it is of the utmost importance to apply these models, methods and strategies of environmental design to attain the efficacy of the building, mainly on the stage of life service related to use, operation and maintenance of the building, which is the stage that impacts and pollutes the environment the most.

Suggested Citation

  • Silverio HERNANDEZ-MORENO, 2011. "Importance Of Service Life Planning In Sustainable Architecture," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(3), pages 21-31, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:3:y:2011:i:3:p:21-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrp.ase.ro/no33/f3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iuliana NICHERSU & Cristina IACOBOAEA, 2011. "Systematic Spatial Planning," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(2), pages 67-77, May.
    2. Cristina ALPOPI & Cristina MANOLE & Sofia Elena COLESCA, 2011. "Assessment Of The Sustainable Urban Development Level Through The Use Of Indicators Of Sustainability," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(2), pages 78-87, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcin FELTYNOWSKI, 2013. "The Use Of Geographical Information Systems In The Urban Communes Of ?ÓD? Metropolitan Area," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 5(1), pages 5-13, March.
    2. Silverio HernAndez MORENO, 2012. "The Method By Factors To Estimate Service Life In Uildings Projects According To Norm Iso 15686," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(4), pages 5-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreea Ileana Zamfir, 2011. "Management Of Renewable Energy And Regional Development: European Experiences And Steps Forward," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(3), pages 35-42, August.
    2. Armenia Androniceanu, 2012. "Civil Servants Career Development in the Romanian Central Public Administration," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2012(19), pages 43-52, December.
    3. Gheorghe BASANU & Victor TELEASA & Robert CHIRA & Serban TARANU, 2011. "The Estimation of the Operational Capacity of the Logistic System According to the Level of the Functionality Status of its Constituent Organizations," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(4), pages 780-800, October.
    4. Fang‐Li Ruan & Liang Yan, 2022. "Challenges facing indicators to become a universal language for sustainable urban development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 41-57, February.
    5. Adam Przybyłowski & Agnieszka Kałaska & Piotr Przybyłowski, 2022. "Quest for a Tool Measuring Urban Quality of Life: ISO 37120 Standard Sustainable Development Indicators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Nidia Isabel Molina-Gómez & Karen Rodríguez-Rojas & Dayam Calderón-Rivera & José Luis Díaz-Arévalo & P. Amparo López-Jiménez, 2020. "Using Machine Learning Tools to Classify Sustainability Levels in the Development of Urban Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Cheng Li & Junxiang Li, 2017. "Assessing Urban Sustainability Using a Multi-Scale, Theme-Based Indicator Framework: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Pingtao Yi & Qiankun Dong & Weiwei Li & Lu Wang, 2023. "Assessment of city sustainability with the consideration of synergy among economy–society–environment criteria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7645-7668, August.
    9. Roşca Vlad I., 2019. "Costs a pretty penny: how household income impacts upon motorization in Europe and raises manufacturer branding challenges," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 759-771, May.
    10. Piotr Przybyłowski & Adam Przybyłowski & Agnieszka Kałaska, 2021. "Utility Method as an Instrument of the Quality of Life Assessment Using the Examples of Selected European Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Abubakr A. A. ALSHARIF & Biswajeet PRADHAN & Shattri MANSOR & Helmi Zulhaidi Mohd SHAFRI, 2015. "Urban expansion assessment by using remotely sensed data and the relative Shannon entropy model in GIS: A case study of Tripoli, Libya," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 55-71, February.
    12. Andreea Zamfir & Razvan-Andrei Corbos, 2015. "Towards Sustainable Tourism Development in Urban Areas: Case Study on Bucharest as Tourist Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Antczak-Stępniak Agata, 2020. "The Role of the Study of Conditions and Directions of Spatial Development of the Commune in the Growth of Developers’ Activity Based on the Łódź Example," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 65-76, September.
    14. Dimitrios TSIOTAS & Labros SDROLIAS & Georgios ASPRIDIS & Ioannis PAPADIMOPOULOS, 2020. "Geographical And Socioeconomic Determinants In The Topology Of Spatial Networks: Evidence From The Interregional Road Network In Greece," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(3), pages 5-28, August.
    15. Juan Tang & Hong-lin Zhu & Zhi Liu & Fu Jia & Xiao-xue Zheng, 2019. "Urban Sustainability Evaluation under the Modified TOPSIS Based on Grey Relational Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:3:y:2011:i:3:p:21-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.