IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3326-d347765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Machine Learning Tools to Classify Sustainability Levels in the Development of Urban Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Nidia Isabel Molina-Gómez

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Universidad Santo Tomás, 110231 Bogota, Colombia
    Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Karen Rodríguez-Rojas

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Universidad Santo Tomás, 110231 Bogota, Colombia)

  • Dayam Calderón-Rivera

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Universidad Santo Tomás, 110231 Bogota, Colombia)

  • José Luis Díaz-Arévalo

    (Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 111321 Bogota, Colombia)

  • P. Amparo López-Jiménez

    (Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

Different studies have been carried out to evaluate the progress made by countries and cities towards achieving sustainability to compare its evolution. However, the micro-territorial level, which encompasses a community perspective, has not been examined through a comprehensive forecasting method of sustainability categories with machine learning tools. This study aims to establish a method to forecast the sustainability levels of an urban ecosystem through supervised modeling. To this end, it was necessary to establish a set of indicators that characterize the dimensions of sustainable development, consistent with the Sustainable Development Goals. Using the data normalization technique to process the information and combining it in different dimensions made it possible to identify the sustainability level of the urban zone for each year from 2009 to 2017. The resulting information was the basis for the supervised classification. It was found that the sustainability level in the micro-territory has been improving from a low level in 2009, which increased to a medium level in the subsequent years. Forecasts of the sustainability levels of the zone were possible by using decision trees, neural networks, and support vector machines, in which 70% of the data were used to train the machine learning tools, with the remaining 30% used for validation. According to the performance metrics, decision trees outperformed the other two tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Nidia Isabel Molina-Gómez & Karen Rodríguez-Rojas & Dayam Calderón-Rivera & José Luis Díaz-Arévalo & P. Amparo López-Jiménez, 2020. "Using Machine Learning Tools to Classify Sustainability Levels in the Development of Urban Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3326-:d:347765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Shen & Jared M. Kyllo & Xulin Guo, 2013. "An Integrated Model Based on a Hierarchical Indices System for Monitoring and Evaluating Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-36, February.
    2. Cristina ALPOPI & Cristina MANOLE & Sofia Elena COLESCA, 2011. "Assessment Of The Sustainable Urban Development Level Through The Use Of Indicators Of Sustainability," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(2), pages 78-87, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreea Ileana Zamfir, 2011. "Management Of Renewable Energy And Regional Development: European Experiences And Steps Forward," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(3), pages 35-42, August.
    2. Anibal Gusso & Cristina Cafruni & Fabiane Bordin & Mauricio Roberto Veronez & Leticia Lenz & Sabrina Crija, 2015. "Multi-Temporal Patterns of Urban Heat Island as Response to Economic Growth Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Qunxi Gong & Min Chen & Xianli Zhao & Zhigeng Ji, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Development System Measurement Based on Dissipative Structure Theory, the Grey Entropy Method and Coupling Theory: A Case Study in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Armenia Androniceanu, 2012. "Civil Servants Career Development in the Romanian Central Public Administration," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2012(19), pages 43-52, December.
    5. Francis Rathinam & Sayak Khatua & Zeba Siddiqui & Manya Malik & Pallavi Duggal & Samantha Watson & Xavier Vollenweider, 2021. "Using big data for evaluating development outcomes: A systematic map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    6. Fang‐Li Ruan & Liang Yan, 2022. "Challenges facing indicators to become a universal language for sustainable urban development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 41-57, February.
    7. Stanislav E. Shmelev & Nathan Lefievre & Nadim Saadi & Irina A. Shmeleva, 2023. "Interdisciplinary Linkages among Sustainability Dimensions in the Context of European Cities and Regions Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-28, October.
    8. Adam Przybyłowski & Agnieszka Kałaska & Piotr Przybyłowski, 2022. "Quest for a Tool Measuring Urban Quality of Life: ISO 37120 Standard Sustainable Development Indicators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Anibal Gusso & André Silva & John Boland & Leticia Lenz & Conrad Philipp, 2017. "Income Driven Patterns of the Urban Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Helen W Zheng & Geoffrey QP Shen & Yan Song & Bingxia Sun & Jingke Hong, 2017. "Neighborhood sustainability in urban renewal: An assessment framework," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(5), pages 903-924, September.
    11. Cheng Li & Junxiang Li, 2017. "Assessing Urban Sustainability Using a Multi-Scale, Theme-Based Indicator Framework: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Sowińska-Świerkosz, Barbara & Soszyński, Dawid, 2022. "Spatial indicators as a tool to support the decision-making process in relation to different goals of rural planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Pingtao Yi & Qiankun Dong & Weiwei Li & Lu Wang, 2023. "Assessment of city sustainability with the consideration of synergy among economy–society–environment criteria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7645-7668, August.
    14. Xuedong Liang & Weiwei Zhang & Lei Chen & Fumin Deng, 2016. "Sustainable Urban Development Capacity Measure—A Case Study in Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Roşca Vlad I., 2019. "Costs a pretty penny: how household income impacts upon motorization in Europe and raises manufacturer branding challenges," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 759-771, May.
    16. Lie Ma & Dandan Li & Xiaobo Tao & Haifeng Dong & Bei He & Xiaosu Ye, 2017. "Inequality, Bi-Polarization and Mobility of Urban Infrastructure Investment in China’s Urban System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Piotr Przybyłowski & Adam Przybyłowski & Agnieszka Kałaska, 2021. "Utility Method as an Instrument of the Quality of Life Assessment Using the Examples of Selected European Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Abubakr A. A. ALSHARIF & Biswajeet PRADHAN & Shattri MANSOR & Helmi Zulhaidi Mohd SHAFRI, 2015. "Urban expansion assessment by using remotely sensed data and the relative Shannon entropy model in GIS: A case study of Tripoli, Libya," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 55-71, February.
    19. Andreea Zamfir & Razvan-Andrei Corbos, 2015. "Towards Sustainable Tourism Development in Urban Areas: Case Study on Bucharest as Tourist Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Dimitrios TSIOTAS & Labros SDROLIAS & Georgios ASPRIDIS & Ioannis PAPADIMOPOULOS, 2020. "Geographical And Socioeconomic Determinants In The Topology Of Spatial Networks: Evidence From The Interregional Road Network In Greece," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(3), pages 5-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3326-:d:347765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.