IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/bemann/v8y2018i3p12-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review Of The Internal And External Barriers To Public Sector Innovation In Kosovo

Author

Listed:
  • Rinor KURTESH

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Prishtina Hasan Prishtina, Prishtina, Kosovo)

Abstract

The focus of this study is to identify the barriers to innovation processes in the public sector of Kosovo. This study is exploratory and a mixed methodology is used, while the findings are compared and contrasted with the most recent literature in public sector innovation. The findings clearly indicate that a risk-averse culture still persists in Kosovo’s public sector. In addition to that, lack of human and financial resources add another important barrier towards public sector innovation. Moreover, staff resistance is also considered an important barrier to public sector innovation in Kosovo. Therefore, it is recommended for public sector managers to integrate the new concepts of open innovation and networked governance to diminish these barriers. These concepts demand engaging all employees as well as external parties in critical innovation processes which in default will lead to the adoption of a culture of innovation in the public sector of Kosovo. This study contributes to further research, regarding the adoption of a culture of innovation in the public sector of developing countries. Lastly, this research enriches and extends the current knowledge of public sector innovation with focus on the barriers to public sector innovation processes in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Rinor KURTESH, 2018. "A Systematic Review Of The Internal And External Barriers To Public Sector Innovation In Kosovo," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(3), pages 12-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:12-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://beman.ase.ro/no83/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Sauermann & Wesley M. Cohen, 2008. "What Makes Them Tick? Employee Motives and Firm Innovation," NBER Working Papers 14443, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. David Albury, 2005. "Fostering Innovation in Public Services," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 51-56, January.
    3. Mark H. Moore, 2005. "Break-Through Innovations and Continuous Improvement: Two Different Models of Innovative Processes in the Public Sector," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 43-50, January.
    4. Buurman, Margaretha & Delfgaauw, Josse & Dur, Robert & Van den Bossche, Seth, 2012. "Public sector employees: Risk averse and altruistic?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 279-291.
    5. Jean Hartley, 2005. "Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 27-34, January.
    6. Christian Pfeifer, 2011. "Risk Aversion and Sorting into Public Sector Employment," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 12(1), pages 85-99, February.
    7. Chung-An Chen & Barry Bozeman, 2012. "Organizational Risk Aversion: Comparing The Public and Non-Profit Sectors," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 377-402, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clark, Richard & Griffith, Garry & Madzivhandila, Tshilidzi & Mulholland, Cynthia & Nengovhela, Nkhanedzeni & Timms, Janice, 2012. "Learning by Writing: Applying Continuous Improvement and Innovation Principles to Project Management by Formal Documentation and Publication," Papers 234293, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment.
    2. Torugsa, Nuttaneeya (Ann) & Arundel, Anthony, 2017. "Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 900-910.
    3. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.
    4. Kurteshi Rinor, 2018. "Human Resources Supporting Innovation in the Public Sector: The Case of Kosovo," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 9(3), pages 153-172, December.
    5. Rinor F. Kurteshi, 2018. "Information Sources Supporting Innovation In The Public Sector: The Case Of Kosovo," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 22-31, September.
    6. Ayaita Adam & Yang Philip & Gülal Filiz, 2019. "Where Does the Good Shepherd Go? Civic Virtue and Sorting into Public Sector Employment," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 571-599, December.
    7. Tor Helge Aas & Nina Jentoft & Mikaela Vasstrøm, 2016. "Managing innovation of care services: An exploration of Norwegian municipalities," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1215762-121, December.
    8. Köllő, János, 2013. "A közszféra bérszintje és a magánszektorból átlépők szelekciója 1997-2008 között [Public-sector pay and flows from the private to the public sector]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 523-554.
    9. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Stephanie Prümer & Claus Schnabel, 2019. "Questioning the Stereotype of the “Malingering Bureaucrat”: Absence from Work in the Public and Private Sector in Germany," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 570-603, November.
    11. Shuping Wu & Zan Yang, 2023. "Government Behavior on Urban Land Supply: Does it Follow a Prospect Preference?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 264-286, August.
    12. Marta Orviska & Juraj Nemec, 2015. "Public Sector Innovation Support by European States: Its Characteristics and Impact on Firms," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(1), pages 19-31.
    13. Jung, SeEun & Choe, Chung & Oaxaca, Ronald L., 2018. "Gender wage gaps and risky vs. secure employment: An experimental analysis," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 112-121.
    14. Min-Seok Pang, 2017. "Politics and Information Technology Investments in the U.S. Federal Government in 2003–2016," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 33-45, March.
    15. Dur Robert & Zoutenbier Robin, 2015. "Intrinsic Motivations of Public Sector Employees: Evidence for Germany," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 343-366, August.
    16. Tufan Özsoy & Konuralp Sezgili, 2024. "Exploring the Current Practices and Future Directions in Project Management Education and Training," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, March.
    17. Michal Livnat-Lerer & Raanan Sulitzeau-Kenan & Tehila Kogut, 2018. "Foresighted outcome effect: A micro-foundation of agents’ risk aversion in principal-agent relations," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 1(1).
    18. Aaron M. Lane, 2020. "The destruction phase of public sector innovation: regulations governing school closure in Australia," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1151-1169, September.
    19. Maria Paola, 2013. "The Determinants of Risk Aversion: The Role of Intergenerational Transmission," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 14(2), pages 214-234, May.
    20. Soyoung Park & Yinglee Tseng & Sungchan Kim, 2016. "The Impact of Innovation on Job Satisfaction: Evidence from U.S. Federal Agencies," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 274-286, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:12-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zamfir Andreea (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.