IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Instruments of State Support Distribution in the Agrarian Sector
[Стратегические Инструменты Распределения Господдержки Аграрного Сектора]

Author

Listed:
  • Samygin, Denis Yu. (Самыгин, Денис)

    (Penza State University)

  • Kudryavtsev, Alexandr A. (Кудрявцев, Александр)

    (Penza State Technological University)

Abstract

This work raises the problem of subsidy distribution to Russian regions for agrarian sector support. Having synthesized legal acts, the authors generated data on the state of support tools in the form of allocations from the federal budget to budgets of Russia’s territorial subjects. It is shown that the new budgetary transfer procedures do not correlate with the efficiency of their use, which contradicts the principles of laws on strategic planning and the use of budgetary funds. On the basis of a methodological review, the main tools for subsidy efficiency analysis are generalized and their applicability in Russian practice is revealed. These methods are largely directed towards the description of efficiency assessment processes and diagnose the result of the use of budgetary funds insufficiently. The authors have improved VNIOPTUSH’s method through adding a number of tools, which ensure the assessment of returns from state support use, taking into account the regions’ natural and economic capacity. New communications are revealed, and the functional dependence of support results on natural and economic conditions of reproduction is examined. These tools increase the objectivity of analytical procedures and the effectiveness of the mechanism of fund distribution between regions. Research based on the advanced method provides new data on the efficiency of budgetary funds use, which considerably depends on the extent to which the agrarian capacity of territorial subjects of the Russian Federation is used. Regions with difficult natural and economic conditions have the best efficiency indicators, whereas regions with favorable conditions for agricultural activities have essential reserves to increase the efficiency of subsidy use, which needs to be considered in future state support distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Samygin, Denis Yu. (Самыгин, Денис) & Kudryavtsev, Alexandr A. (Кудрявцев, Александр), 2018. "Strategic Instruments of State Support Distribution in the Agrarian Sector [Стратегические Инструменты Распределения Господдержки Аграрного Сектора]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 156-175, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1844.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена) & Alexandrov, Oleg (Александров, Олег), 2015. "How to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of government programs: methodological issues [Как Оценить Результативность Реализации Государственных Программ: Вопросы Методологии]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 79-98.
    2. Wagner, Alfred, 1891. "Marshall's Principles of Economics," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 5, pages 319-338.
    3. Afanasiev, Roman (Афанасьев, Роман), 2015. "Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of the Russian Federation within the state programs [Оценка Эффективности Расходов Субъектов Российской Федерации В Рамках Государственных Программ]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 99-108.
    4. Denis Samygin, 2017. "Design Model for the Development of Agrarian Economy: Food Aspect," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 591-603.
    5. Uzun, Vasily & Saraykin, Valery & Karlova, Natalya & Gataulina, Ekaterina, "undated". "Methods of Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Policies on Agricultural Development," Published Papers nvg167, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A.J. Arnold, 2017. "Capital reduction case law decisions and the development of the capital maintenance doctrine in late-nineteenth-century England," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 172-190, February.
    2. Yariv, Leeat & Jackson, Matthew O., 2018. "The Non-Existence of Representative Agents," CEPR Discussion Papers 13397, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. SAITO Yukiko, 2013. "Role of Hub Firms in Geographical Transaction Network," Discussion papers 13080, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci & Stefano Usai, 2013. "Productivity Growth In The Old And New Europe: The Role Of Agglomeration Externalities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 418-442, August.
    5. Duranton, Gilles & Jayet, Hubert, 2011. "Is the division of labour limited by the extent of the market? Evidence from French cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 56-71, January.
    6. Kristien Werck & Bruno Heyndels & Benny Geys, 2008. "The impact of ‘central places’ on spatial spending patterns: evidence from Flemish local government cultural expenditures," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 35-58, March.
    7. Koech Cheruiyot, 2022. "Detecting spatial economic clusters using kernel density and global and local Moran's I analysis in Ekurhuleni metropolitan municipality, South Africa," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 307-327, April.
    8. Evert-Jan Visser & Oedzge Atzema, 2007. "With or Without Clusters: Facilitating Innovation through a Differentiated and Combined Network Approach," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(9), pages 1169-1188, April.
    9. Ramesh Chandra & Roger J. Sandilands, 2021. "Nicholas Kaldor, increasing returns and Verdoorn’s Law," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 315-339, April.
    10. SHIMAMOTO Daichi & Yu Ri KIM & TODO Yasuyuki, 2019. "The Effect of Social Interactions on Exporting Activities: Evidence from Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Enterprises in rural Vietnam," Discussion papers 19020, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    11. Carlino, Gerald & Kerr, William R., 2015. "Agglomeration and Innovation," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 349-404, Elsevier.
    12. Giulia Faggio & Olmo Silva & William C Strange, 2020. "Tales of the city: what do agglomeration cases tell us about agglomeration in general? [The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation ," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1117-1143.
    13. Paola Tubaro, 2009. "Is individual rationality essential to market price formation? The contribution of zero-intelligence agent trading models," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19.
    14. H. W. Arndt, 1984. "Political Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 60(3), pages 266-273, September.
    15. Berliant, Marcus & Reed III, Robert R. & Wang, Ping, 2006. "Knowledge exchange, matching, and agglomeration," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 69-95, July.
    16. Margolin, Andrey (Марголин, Андрей), 2018. "Why Government Program Evaluation Methodologies Require Improvement [Пути Совершенствования Методов Оценки Эффективности Государственных Программ]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 54-81, December.
    17. G.M. Peter Swann, 2017. "A Welcome Revolution in Innovation," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 223-231, May.
    18. Anders Waxell, 2008. "Guilty by Association: A Cross-industrial Approach to Sourcing Complementary Knowledge in the Uppsala Biotechnology Cluster," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(11), pages 1605-1624, December.
    19. Alex Coad & Christina Guenther, 2012. "Age, diversification and survival in the German machine tool industry, 1953-2002," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2011-23, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    20. Roberto Ganau & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2022. "Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1275-1299, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    budgetary appropriations; agrarian sector; assessment of subsidy efficiency; effectiveness of budgetary funds; distribution of state support.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.