IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfh/bbejor/v13y2024i2p918-924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Information in Organizations by the Employees is Fruitful or not? A Theoretical Context

Author

Listed:
  • Farrukh Abbas

    (PhD Scholar, University Institute of Management Sciences, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan)

  • Irfan Ullah

    (Doctor of Philosophy in Business Administration, Iqra University, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan)

  • Raja Mazhar Hameed

    (Doctor of Philosophy in Business Administration, National Book Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan)

  • Nida Zahid

    (Doctor of Philosophy in Management Sciences, Bahria University Islamabad, Pakistan)

Abstract

The phrase perceived information refers feeling or self-assessments of knowing related information. Perceived information’s level affects the intellectual capacity and makes use of interrelationships amid new portions of information in subjects like choice decision tasks. It also influences themes’ assessments of the significance of latest and old information. This research effort is necessary for elaborating the value of perceived information by the employees for their job satisfaction. As the phrase, perceived information needs to be discussed because there is not much literature on it. It is a context base analysis from existing literature; where information sharing is considered as independent, whereas job satisfaction is dependent variable. Perceived information along with its dimensions is use as mediation that the workforce is perceiving the information from the environment through information sharing’s as well as it has impacts on job satisfaction. Investigation on available literature is exploring that perceived basic (initial, necessary), appropriate (specific) and actionable information by the workforce have both positive and negative impacts. However, it depends upon the nature of workforce especially their levels to understand and handle the things. This study is highlighting both bright and dark sides of information. When information has higher level of perceived intrinsic information quality, but lacks contextual weight or realistic applications, it might not facilitate job satisfaction. Some theoretical links has been elaborated in this study i.e., functions of basic, appropriate and actionable information.

Suggested Citation

  • Farrukh Abbas & Irfan Ullah & Raja Mazhar Hameed & Nida Zahid, 2024. "Perceived Information in Organizations by the Employees is Fruitful or not? A Theoretical Context," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 918-924.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:918-924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/925/958
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/925
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul R. Carlile, 2004. "Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 555-568, October.
    2. Waqas Shair & Abdul Waheed & Muhammad Mubasher Kamran & Neelam Kubra, 2022. "Digital Divide in Pakistan: Barriers to ICT Usage among the Individuals of Pakistan," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 196-204.
    3. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    4. Rob Cross & Lee Sproull, 2004. "More Than an Answer: Information Relationships for Actionable Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 446-462, August.
    5. Stephanie Watts Sussman & Wendy Schneier Siegal, 2003. "Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    6. Roh, Taewoo & Seok, Junhee & Kim, Yaeri, 2022. "Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 2001. "Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 198-213, April.
    8. Fiona Murray & Siobhán O'Mahony, 2007. "Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 1006-1021, December.
    9. Park, C Whan & Mothersbaugh, David L & Feick, Lawrence, 1994. "Consumer Knowledge Assessment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 71-82, June.
    10. Eppright, David R. & Tanner, John Jr. & Hunt, James B., 1994. "Knowledge and the ordered protection motivation model: Tools for preventing AIDS," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 13-24, May.
    11. Lies De Kimpe & Michel Walrave & Pieter Verdegem & Koen Ponnet, 2022. "What we think we know about cybersecurity: an investigation of the relationship between perceived knowledge, internet trust, and protection motivation in a cybercrime context," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 1796-1808, June.
    12. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dean A. Shepherd & Marc Gruber, 2021. "The Lean Startup Framework: Closing the Academic–Practitioner Divide," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 967-998, September.
    2. Jacqueline N. Lane & Ina Ganguli & Patrick Gaule & Eva Guinan & Karim R. Lakhani, 2021. "Engineering serendipity: When does knowledge sharing lead to knowledge production?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1215-1244, June.
    3. repec:hal:gemwpa:hal-00864332 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ferguson, J.E. & Huysman, M.H., 2009. "Between ambition and approach: towards sustainable knowledge management in development organizations," Serie Research Memoranda 0003, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Esther Tippmann & Pamela Sharkey Scott & Vincent Mangematin, 2014. "Stimulating Knowledge Search Routines and Architecture Competences: The Role of Organizational Context and Middle Management," Post-Print hal-00864332, HAL.
    6. Esther Tippmann & Pamela Sharkey Scott & Vincent Mangematin, 2014. "Stimulating Knowledge Search Routines and Architecture Competences: The Role of Organizational Context and Middle Management," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00864332, HAL.
    7. Martinkenaite, Ieva & Breunig, Karl Joachim, 2016. "The emergence of absorptive capacity through micro–macro level interactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 700-708.
    8. George Kuk, 2006. "Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1031-1042, July.
    9. Ceci, Federica & Prencipe, Andrea, 2013. "Does Distance Hinder Coordination? Identifying and Bridging Boundaries of Offshored Work," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 324-332.
    10. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.
    11. Samina Karim & Aseem Kaul, 2015. "Structural Recombination and Innovation: Unlocking Intraorganizational Knowledge Synergy Through Structural Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 439-455, April.
    12. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    13. Marte C.W. Solheim & Ron Boschma & Sverre Herstad, 2018. "Related variety, unrelated variety and the novelty content of firm innovation in urban and non-urban locations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1836, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2018.
    14. Maria Franca Norese & Diana Rolando & Rocco Curto, 2023. "DIKEDOC: a multicriteria methodology to organise and communicate knowledge," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1049-1082, June.
    15. Nay Chi Khin Khin Oo & Sirisuhk Rakthin, 2022. "Integrative Review of Absorptive Capacity’s Role in Fostering Organizational Resilience and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    17. Nabila Benmostefa, 2017. "Intergenerational sharing of knowledge in communities of practice: A theoretical framework [Le partage intergénérationnel des connaissances dans les communautés de pratique : Un cadre théorique]," Post-Print hal-01781362, HAL.
    18. Alison Bullock & Zoё Slote Morris & Christine Atwell, 2013. "Exchanging knowledge through healthcare manager placements in research teams," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(13-14), pages 1363-1380, October.
    19. Vieru, Dragos & Rivard, Suzanne, 2014. "Organizational identity challenges in a post-merger context: A case study of an information system implementation project," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 381-386.
    20. Stefano Brusoni & Lorenzo Cassi & Simge Tuna, 2021. "Knowledge integration between technical change and strategy making," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1521-1552, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:918-924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.