IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v5y2017i7p54-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constraints and Facilitators for Successful Integration: How Bureaucratic Contacts Affects Migrants’ Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Warda Belabas
  • Lasse Gerrits

Abstract

Integration of migrants in Dutch society is a continuous political concern. The regulations governing the immigrant integration processes, and the formal demands to the migrants have been revised several times. Inevitably, the process requires the immigrant to engage in bureaucratic contacts. We postulate that these bureaucratic contacts have a reinforcing or a dampening effect on the integration process, hence on its success. We deployed a grounded research approach in order to investigate this assumption. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 51 migrants. We conclude that bureaucratic contacts have considerable impact on many aspects of the migrants' lives. The observed patterns of positive and negative loops with both favorable and unfavorable consequences for migrants demonstrate the systematic reality in which integration processes develop. The bureaucratic contacts – or lack thereof – are constantly used by migrants to evaluate their situation and to decide on new actions. This in turn sets off a chain reaction that impacts both bureaucratic contacts later on and the way migrants integrate in Dutch society.

Suggested Citation

  • Warda Belabas & Lasse Gerrits, 2017. "Constraints and Facilitators for Successful Integration: How Bureaucratic Contacts Affects Migrants’ Pathways," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(7), pages 54-65, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:7:p:54-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/2496/2628
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/2496
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sterman, J.D., 2006. "Learning from evidence in a complex world," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 505-514.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mishra, Divya & Digidiki, Vasileia & Winch, Peter J., 2020. "The endings of journeys: A qualitative study of how Greece’s child protection system shapes unaccompanied migrant children’s futures," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Jones, Bobby & Caudill, Barry & Nakaima, April, 2016. "Steps towards incorporating heterogeneities into program theory: A case study of a data-driven approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 88-97.
    2. Wenjing Luo & Zhi Qiu & Yurika Yokoyama & Shengyuan Zheng, 2022. "Decision-Making Mechanism of Joint Activities for the Elderly and Children in Integrated Welfare Facilities: A Discussion Based on “Motivation–Constraint” Interaction Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:6558 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Louise Freebairn & Jo-An Atkinson & Nathaniel D Osgood & Paul M Kelly & Geoff McDonnell & Lucie Rychetnik, 2019. "Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen & Urban, Jennifer Brown & Frerichs, Leah & Dave, Gaurav, 2017. "Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 254-264.
    6. Yuxuan Xu & Jiangbo Chang & Fang Su, 2024. "Multi-Scale Evaluation and Simulation of Livelihood Efficiency in Post-Poverty Mountainous Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-35, October.
    7. Boelsen-Robinson, Tara & Blake, Miranda R. & Brown, Andrew D. & Huse, Oliver & Palermo, Claire & George, Neetu A. & Peeters, Anna, 2021. "Mapping factors associated with a successful shift towards healthier food retail in community-based organisations: A systems approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    9. David Rees & Janet Stephenson & Debbie Hopkins & Adam Doering, 2017. "Exploring stability and change in transport systems: combining Delphi and system dynamics approaches," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 789-805, July.
    10. Edward J. Garrity, 2011. "System Dynamics Modeling of Individual Transferable Quota Fisheries and Suggestions for Rebuilding Stocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-32, January.
    11. repec:mpr:mprres:6554 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Jürgen Strohhecker, 2016. "Factors influencing strategy implementation decisions: an evaluation of a balanced scorecard cockpit, intelligence, and knowledge," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 89-119, February.
    13. Willis, Cameron David & Corrigan, Crystal & Stockton, Lisa & Greene, Julie Kathryn & Riley, Barbara Lyn, 2017. "Exploring the unanticipated effects of multi-sectoral partnerships in chronic disease prevention," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 158-168.
    14. Sondoss Elsawah & Allen Tim Luen Ho & Michael J. Ryan, 2022. "Teaching Systems Thinking in Higher Education," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 66-102, January.
    15. Wayne Wakeland & Alexandra Nielsen & Teresa D. Schmidt, 2016. "Gaining Policy Insight with a System Dynamics Model of Pain Medicine Prescribing, Diversion and Abuse," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 400-412, May.
    16. Paulo Gonçalves & Paolo Ferrari & Luca Crivelli & Emiliano Albanese, 2023. "Model‐informed health system reorganization during emergencies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1323-1344, May.
    17. Mahamoud, Aziza & Roche, Brenda & Homer, Jack, 2013. "Modelling the social determinants of health and simulating short-term and long-term intervention impacts for the city of Toronto, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 247-255.
    18. Brydie Clarke & Janelle Kwon & Boyd Swinburn & Gary Sacks, 2021. "Understanding the dynamics of obesity prevention policy decision-making using a systems perspective: A case study of Healthy Together Victoria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Christophe Feder & Beniamino Callegari & David Collste, 2024. "The system dynamics approach for a global evolutionary analysis of sustainable development," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 351-374, April.
    20. Zhang, J. & Tong, L. & Lamberson, P.J. & Durazo-Arvizu, R.A. & Luke, A. & Shoham, D.A., 2015. "Leveraging social influence to address overweight and obesity using agent-based models: The role of adolescent social networks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 203-213.
    21. Ivana Stankov & Natasha J. Howard & Mark Daniel & Margaret Cargo, 2017. "Policy, Research and Residents’ Perspectives on Built Environments Implicated in Heart Disease: A Concept Mapping Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, February.
    22. Pagani, Anna & Macmillan, Alex & Savini, Federico & Davies, Michael & Zimmermann, Nici, 2025. "What if there were a moratorium on new housebuilding? An exploratory study with London-based housing associations," SocArXiv f6suj_v2, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    migration; integration; complex systems; bureaucratic contacts; feedback loops;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:7:p:54-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.