IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v8y2019i6p201-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interplay of relational governance, task conflict, opportunism and their effect on the performance of projects

Author

Listed:
  • Jawad Talha Rehan

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China)

  • Zhao Xuefeng

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China)

  • Rafiq Mansoor

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China)

Abstract

Practitioners and academics have been perplexed over the years by low efficiency and bad performance in construction projects. Several critical factors have been uncovered by previous studies which are governance mechanism, task conflict and opportunism. But an obvious question arises how the mechanism of governance in the presence of conflict can mitigate opportunism. The overarching objective of this study is therefore to create a model to study the effectiveness of these mechanisms of governance in the presence of task conflict. This paper is based on a positivist study philosophy in which a quantitative deductive method was used to collect data from 139 participants. Hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) through SmartPLS3.The research findings show that relational governance affects project efficiency considerably and is helpful in decreasing opportunism and conflict. In addition, there is proof that opportunistic behavior will increase the task conflict among parties but both task conflict and opportunism doesn’t have direct impact on the performance of project Key Words:Relational Governance; Project performance; Task Conflict; Opportunism

Suggested Citation

  • Jawad Talha Rehan & Zhao Xuefeng & Rafiq Mansoor, 2019. "Interplay of relational governance, task conflict, opportunism and their effect on the performance of projects," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(6), pages 201-211, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:6:p:201-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/534/483
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/534/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David A Griffith & Matthew B Myers, 2005. "The performance implications of strategic fit of relational norm governance strategies in global supply chain relationships," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 36(3), pages 254-269, May.
    2. Preet S Aulakh & Masaaki Kotabe & Arvind Sahay, 1996. "Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral Approach," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 27(5), pages 1005-1032, December.
    3. Preet S Aulakh & Masaaki Kotabe & Arvind Sahay, 1996. "Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral Approach," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 27(4), pages 1005-1032, December.
    4. Sean M. Handley & Corey M. Angst, 2015. "The impact of culture on the relationship between governance and opportunism in outsourcing relationships," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(9), pages 1412-1434, September.
    5. Ann C. Mooney & Patricia J. Holahan & Allen C. Amason, 2007. "Don't Take It Personally: Exploring Cognitive Conflict as a Mediator of Affective Conflict," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 733-758, July.
    6. Ellen Lau & Steve Rowlinson, 2009. "Interpersonal trust and inter-firm trust in construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 539-554.
    7. Sandy D. Jap & Erin Anderson, 2003. "Safeguarding Interorganizational Performance and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(12), pages 1684-1701, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Szozda & Artur Świerczek, 2022. "Upstream and downstream dyad governance within the network structures: Creating supply chain governance for the customized products," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 873-898, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huo, Baofeng & Fu, Dijia & Zhao, Xiande & Zhu, Jingwen, 2016. "Curbing opportunism in logistics outsourcing relationships: The role of relational norms and contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 293-303.
    2. Seggie, Steven H. & Griffith, David A., 2021. "The moderating effects of economic and strategic relationship value in tolerating active and passive opportunism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 233-244.
    3. Ghasem Zaefarian & Matthew J. Robson & Zhaleh Najafi-Tavani & Stavroula Spyropoulou, 2023. "Relationships of stressors and opportunism in cross-border exchange partnership contexts: When and how monitoring matters," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(3), pages 441-475, April.
    4. Joanita Kataike & Xavier Gellynck, 2018. "22 Years of Governance Structures and Performance: What Has Been Achieved in Agrifood Chains and Beyond? A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, March.
    5. Wu, Jie & Wu, Zefu & Si, Steven, 2016. "The influences of Internet-based collaboration and intimate interactions in buyer–supplier relationship on product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3780-3787.
    6. Vaidyanathan Jayaraman & Zuoming Liu, 2019. "Aligning governance mechanisms with task features to improve service capabilities---an empirical study of professional service outsourcing in India," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 19-39, June.
    7. Pei Chun-Lai & Tomás F Espino-Rodríguez & Tom Baum, 2019. "Do relational norms matter in outsourcing relationships? Lesson learned from hotel sectors," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(2), pages 189-212, March.
    8. Steven H. Dahlquist & David A. Griffith, 2015. "A framework for the formation of governance portfolios in international interfirm marketing collaborations," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 5(1), pages 45-59, June.
    9. Pyper, Keith & Doherty, Anne Marie, 2022. "Employing brand governance mechanisms with export channel partners: What are the performance consequences and contingent effects?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(5).
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13705 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Leinan Zhang & Qingyan Zeng & Silin Zhang & Shuqin Li & Liang Wang, 2022. "Transaction-Specific Investment and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Steven Dahlquist & David Griffith, 2015. "A framework for the formation of governance portfolios in international interfirm marketing collaborations," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 5(1), pages 45-59, June.
    13. Chao-Hung Wang & Kuan-Liang Chen, 2018. "Do Relationships have a Dark Side for Innovation Performance in the High-Tech Industry?," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Ashwin W. Joshi, 2017. "OEM implementation of supplier-developed component innovations: the role of supplier actions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 548-568, July.
    15. Ziggers, Gerrit Willem & Tjemkes, Brian, 2010. "Dynamics in Inter‐Firm Collaboration: The Impact of Alliance Capabilities on Performance," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(2), pages 1-16.
    16. Thomas Mellewigt & Glenn Hoetker & Martina Lütkewitte, 2018. "Avoiding High Opportunism Is Easy, Achieving Low Opportunism Is Not: A QCA Study on Curbing Opportunism in Buyer–Supplier Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1208-1208, December.
    17. Per Erik Eriksson & Ossi Pesamaa, 2007. "Modelling procurement effects on cooperation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 893-901.
    18. Saeed Samiee & Constantine S. Katsikeas & G. Tomas M. Hult, 2021. "The overarching role of international marketing: Relevance and centrality in research and practice," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1429-1444, October.
    19. Papastamatelou Julie & Busch Rainer & Ötken Begüm & Okan Elif Y. & Gassemi Karim, 2016. "Effects of Network Capabilities on Firm Performance across Cultures," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 49(1), pages 79-105, March.
    20. Arjun Bhardwaj & Joerg Dietz & Paul W. Beamish, 2007. "Host country cultural influences on foreign direct investment," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 29-50, February.
    21. Bello, Daniel C. & Chelariu, Cristian & Zhang, Li, 2003. "The antecedents and performance consequences of relationalism in export distribution channels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:6:p:201-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.