IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v11y2022i10p341-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lecturers' perspectives concerning the variables that hinder critical thinking development in the classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Ikenna Franklin Eze

    (Cape Peninsula University of Technology)

  • Chux Gervase Iwu

    (Cape Peninsula University of Technology)

  • Jobo Dubihlela

    (Cape Peninsula University of Technology)

Abstract

The need to train learners to think critically has been stressed and it has become a key concern among scholars in recent years. Although there is strong evidence demonstrating the benefits of critical thinking as well as proposals for its integration in schools, scholars are still looking for evidence demonstrating how teachers instill critical thinking in the classroom and the obstacles they face. Furthering this argument necessitated lecturers’ feedback on the obstacles to teaching critical thinking in the classroom. Data was collected from academics at a South African university of technology using interpretative phenomenological analysis approaches. The lecturers identified several obstacles that inhibited them from inculcating critical thinking in the classroom. The first one is time, according to the lecturers there is not enough time to inculcate critical thinking since the average lesson last for fifty minutes. The second is the large population of students. The third is the learners themselves who according to the lecturers are indifferent, unwilling to engage. Finally, the educational system according to the lecturers is based on rote learning and memorisation at all levels, which hinders creative, unique, and logical thinking. The findings of this study could have significant consequences for the auditing profession, as teachers are frequently pushed to come up with new approaches to help students improve their critical thinking abilities. Key Words:Critical thinking, Critical thinking obstacles, Interpretative phenomenological analysis, Qualitative research, Focus groups

Suggested Citation

  • Ikenna Franklin Eze & Chux Gervase Iwu & Jobo Dubihlela, 2022. "Lecturers' perspectives concerning the variables that hinder critical thinking development in the classroom," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 341-349, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:341-349
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2232/1625
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Kivunja, 2015. "Teaching Students to Learn and to Work Well with 21st Century Skills: Unpacking the Career and Life Skills Domain of the New Learning Paradigm," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-1, February.
    2. Ester van Laar & Alexander J. A. M. van Deursen & Jan A. G. M. van Dijk & Jos de Haan, 2020. "Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paweł Ziemba & Mateusz Piwowarski & Kesra Nermend, 2023. "Remote Work in Post-Pandemic Reality—Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Teleconferencing Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Yahya Fikri & Mohamed Rhalma, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Early Childhood Education (ECE): Do Effects and Interactions Matter?," Post-Print hal-04701470, HAL.
    3. Jana Stofkova & Adela Poliakova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Matej Krejnus & Vladimira Binasova & Naqibullah Daneshjo, 2022. "Digital Skills as a Significant Factor of Human Resources Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Christian Stary, 2023. "Digital Process Twins as Intelligent Design Technology for Engineering Metaverse/XR Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Caterina Belle Azzarello & Lee Arakawa & Daniel Edi & Madasyn Sutton & Randy Larkins, 2021. "Perceived Life-Readiness from Real-World Curriculum Experiences of Alumni," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(6), pages 1-33, December.
    6. Rosa M. Serrano & Oscar Casanova, 2022. "Toward a Technological and Methodological Shift in Music Learning in Spain: Students’ Perception of Their Initial Teacher Training," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    7. Cigdem Hursen & Derviş Paşa & Hafize Keser, 2023. "High School Students’ Use of Information, Media, and Technology Skills and Multidimensional 21st-Century Skills: An Investigation within the Context of Students, Teachers, and Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Cátia Rosário & Celeste Varum & Anabela Botelho, 2024. "Comparison of the Profile of Portuguese Companies That Receive Public Support for Innovation: National Support vs. European Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Vida Lang & Andrej Šorgo, 2024. "Views of Students, Parents, and Teachers on Smartphones and Tablets in the Development of 21st-Century Skills as a Prerequisite for a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Veronika Bikse & Liva Grinevica & Baiba Rivza & Peteris Rivza, 2022. "Consequences and Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Impact on the Development of Employability Skills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Fatima Afzal & Roksana Jahan Tumpa, 2024. "Exploring Leadership Styles to Foster Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-32, January.
    12. Battisti, Enrico & Alfiero, Simona & Leonidou, Erasmia, 2022. "Remote working and digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Economic–financial impacts and psychological drivers for employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 38-50.
    13. Cordella, Antonio & Gualdi, Francesco & van de Laar, Mindel, 2024. "Digital skills within the public sector: a missing link to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122256, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Helsper, Ellen & Schneider, Luc & van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M. & van Laar, Ester, 2020. "The youth skills digital indicator: report on the conceptualisation and development of the ySkills digital skills measure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108878, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Annika Kreuder & Ulrich Frick & Katrin Rakoczy & Sabine J. Schlittmeier, 2024. "Digital competence in adolescents and young adults: a critical analysis of concomitant variables, methodologies and intervention strategies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Mario Grande-de-Prado & Ruth Cañón & Sheila García-Martín & Isabel Cantón, 2020. "Digital Competence and Gender: Teachers in Training. A Case Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Maria José Sá & Ana Isabel Santos & Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2021. "Digitainability—Digital Competences Post-COVID-19 for a Sustainable Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Laetitia Hauret & Ludivine Martin & Nicolas Poussing, 2024. "Teleworkers’ digital up-skilling: Evidence from the spring 2020 lockdown," Post-Print hal-04574761, HAL.
    19. Fanny Kovaleski & Claudia Tania Picinin & João Luiz Kovaleski, 2022. "The Challenges of Technology Transfer in the Industry 4.0 Era Regarding Anthropotechnological Aspects: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:341-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.