IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v10y2021i3p65-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A retrospective view from traditional to boundaryless career and career success

Author

Listed:
  • Filiz Karakus

    (Independent Researcher, Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

An increasingly dynamic career context has changed the nature of careers and led to the emergence of more autonomous and self-directed boundaryless careers. The common idea in different forms of boundaryless careers is mobility. Psychologically and physically mobile individuals start to manage their own careers in terms of their personal pursuits. In such a career environment, the nature of career success has also changed. The importance of subjective career success has been emphasized more than objective career success because only individuals themselves can meaningfully define and assess their career success with reference to their own self-defined standards, needs, and values in such an unstable environment. With the transmission of career responsibility to the individuals, the need to develop career competencies as knowing why competencies, knowing whom competencies, and knowing how competencies emerge in order to survive and become successful. This study reviews career concept and the new perspectives as a boundaryless career within a constantly changing environment which makes it impossible to become successful unless gaining new competencies and survival methods and the new perspectives on career success with a growing increase in subjective career success instead of objective career success. Key Words:Boundaryless career, Physical Mobility, Psychological mobility, Career Competencies, Career Success, Career management

Suggested Citation

  • Filiz Karakus, 2021. "A retrospective view from traditional to boundaryless career and career success," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(3), pages 65-81, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:65-81
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1131/835
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1131
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael White & Stephen Hill & Patrick McGovern & Colin Mills & Deborah Smeaton, 2003. "‘High‐performance’ Management Practices, Working Hours and Work–Life Balance," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 41(2), pages 175-195, June.
    2. Van Buren, Harry J., 2003. "Boundaryless Careers and Employability Obligations," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 131-149, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John S. Heywood & W.S. Siebert & Xiangdong Wei, 2011. "Estimating the Use of Agency Workers: Can Family-Friendly Practices Reduce Their Use?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 535-564, July.
    2. Cowling, Marc, 2007. "Still At Work? An empirical test of competing theories of long hours culture," MPRA Paper 1614, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Booth, Jonathan & Lup, Daniela, 2024. "Enabling inclusion: an analysis of positive and negative outcomes of discretionary work arrangements for employees with disabilities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126269, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Childe, Stephen J. & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Luo, Zongwei & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Roubaud, David, 2019. "Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 534-545.
    5. Duncan Gallie & Ying Zhou & Alan Felstead & Francis Green & Golo Henseke, 2017. "The implications of direct participation for organisational commitment, job satisfaction and affective psychological well-being: a longitudinal analysis," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 174-191, March.
    6. Samantha Callan, 2007. "Implications of family-friendly policies for organizational culture: findings from two case studies," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 21(4), pages 673-691, December.
    7. Martin Gächter & David A. Savage & Benno Torgler, 2009. "Retaining the Thin Blue Line: What Shapes Workers' Intentions not to Quit the Current Work Environment," Working Papers 2010-05, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck, revised Mar 2010.
    8. G. Delina & R. Prabhakara Raya, 2016. "Dilemma of work-life balance in dual-career couples - a study from the Indian perspective," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27.
    9. Gupta, Vishal, 2013. "Development of a Causal Framework linking High Perofrmance HRM Practices, Positive Psychological Capital, Creative Behaviours," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-03-05, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    10. Naval Garg, 2018. "Isolationist versus Integrationist: An Indian Perspective on High-Performance Work Practices," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 7(3), pages 216-227, September.
    11. Helen Russell & Philip J. O'Connell & Frances McGinnity, 2007. "The Impact of Flexible Working Arrangements on Work-Life Conflict and Work Pressure in Ireland," Papers WP189, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    12. Beckmann, Michael & Hegedüs, Istvan, 2011. "Trust-based working time and organizational performance: evidence from German establishment-level panel data," Working papers 2011/13, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    13. Sarah Brown & Jolian McHardy & Robert McNabb & Karl Taylor, 2011. "Workplace Performance, Worker Commitment, and Loyalty," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 925-955, September.
    14. Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Ma del Mar Ramos-González & Santiago Gutiérrez-Broncano & Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo, 2022. "Creating Financial and Social Value by Improving Employee Well-Being: A PLS-SEM Application in SMEs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Simone T. A. Phipps & Leon C. Prieto, 2016. "A Discovery of Early Labor Organizations and the Women who Advocated Work–Life Balance: An Ethical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 249-261, March.
    16. Lott, Yvonne, 2021. "Do employees always reciprocate homebased working with commitment? The role of blurring boundaries, trust and fairness," WSI Working Papers 213, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    17. John Pencavel, 2016. "Recovery from Work and the Productivity of Working Hours," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 83(332), pages 545-563, October.
    18. Duncan Gallie & Ying Zhou & Alan Felstead & Francis Green, 2012. "Teamwork, Skill Development and Employee Welfare," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 23-46, March.
    19. David HUDGINS & Deniz GEVREK, 2015. "A labor utility index to measure worker welfare and labor market performance," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(3(604), A), pages 155-170, Autumn.
    20. Henz, Ursula & Mills, Colin, 2015. "Work-life conflict in Britain: job demands and resources," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60070, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:65-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.