IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recoru/ecoru_0013-0559_1998_num_245_1_5017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mise en évidence de l'instabilité des modèles de réapprovisionnement continu par une analyse dynamique des systèmes logistiques

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Thiel

Abstract

[fre] Cet article se propose d'analyser la dynamique des échanges entre distributeurs et producteurs à partir du nouveau paradigme qu'est l'Efficient Consumer Response (ECR). Plus précisément, différents modes de réapprovisionnement continu des magasins de détail et des entrepôts des distributeurs ont été comparés. Des modèles génériques représentant trois schémas d'organisation logistique ont été simulés. La modélisation s'est fondée sur le paradigme de la dynamique des systèmes de Forrester tout en s'appuyant sur une approche empirique des relations industrie-commerce et sur des publications portant sur l'ECR. Une synthèse finale des résultats de simulation comportementale de ces trois modèles est présentée dans l'objectif de saisir l'intérêt commun qu'ont fournisseurs et distributeurs à essayer de comprendre comment réagir rapidement sur la totalité du pipeline logistique. [eng] This paper consists in analysing the dynamics of the exchanges between the distributors and the producers basing the ECR new paradigm. More precisely, different methods of continuous replenishments of shops and distributors warehouses has been compared. Generic models which represent these three logistic organisation diagrams have been implemented. The modelling phase based on Forrester's system dynamics paradigm, used an empirical approach of the relationships between industry and commerce and was based on the papers talking about ECR. Finally, we summarise the major simulation of the three models results in objective to try to improve the understanding of the common politics of the distributors and producers, which rapidly permits to react upon the supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Thiel, 1998. "Mise en évidence de l'instabilité des modèles de réapprovisionnement continu par une analyse dynamique des systèmes logistiques," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 245(1), pages 56-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1998_num_245_1_5017
    DOI: 10.3406/ecoru.1998.5017
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.1998.5017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1998.5017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecoru_0013-0559_1998_num_245_1_5017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecoru.1998.5017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph D. Blackburn & Dean H. Kropp & Robert A. Millen, 1986. "A Comparison of Strategies to Dampen Nervousness in MRP Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 413-429, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Kok, Ton & Inderfurth, Karl, 1997. "Nervousness in inventory management: Comparison of basic control rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 55-82, November.
    2. Özen, Ulaş & Doğru, Mustafa K. & Armagan Tarim, S., 2012. "Static-dynamic uncertainty strategy for a single-item stochastic inventory control problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 348-357.
    3. Salewski, Frank & Nissen, Rüdiger, 1993. "Revidierende hierarchische Planung: Ein Konzept am Beispiel der Personaleinsatzplanung in Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 335, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    4. Sivadasan, Suja & Smart, Janet & Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa & Calinescu, Anisoara, 2013. "Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 253-262.
    5. Sahin, Funda & Powell Robinson, E. & Gao, Li-Lian, 2008. "Master production scheduling policy and rolling schedules in a two-stage make-to-order supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 528-541, October.
    6. Ghobbar, Adel A. & Friend, Chris H., 2004. "The material requirements planning system for aircraft maintenance and inventory control: a note," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 217-221.
    7. Narayanan, Arunachalam & Robinson, Powell, 2010. "Evaluation of joint replenishment lot-sizing procedures in rolling horizon planning systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 85-94, September.
    8. Zhao, Xiande & Lam, Kokin, 1997. "Lot-sizing rules and freezing the master production schedule in material requirements planning systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 281-305, December.
    9. Kilic, Onur A. & Tarim, S. Armagan, 2011. "An investigation of setup instability in non-stationary stochastic inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 286-292, September.
    10. Xie, Jinxing & Zhao, Xiande & Lee, T. S., 2003. "Freezing the master production schedule under single resource constraint and demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 65-84, January.
    11. Wijngaard, J., 2004. "The effect of foreknowledge of demand in case of a restricted capacity: The single-stage, single-product case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(1), pages 95-109, November.
    12. Erenguc, S. Selcuk & Simpson, N. C. & Vakharia, Asoo J., 1999. "Integrated production/distribution planning in supply chains: An invited review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 219-236, June.
    13. van Donselaar, K. & van den Nieuwenhof, J. & Visschers, J., 2000. "The impact of material coordination concepts on planning stability in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 169-176, November.
    14. Kimms, A, 1998. "Stability Measures for Rolling Schedules with Applications to Capacity Expansion Planning, Master Production Scheduling, and Lot Sizing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 355-366, June.
    15. Demirel, Edil & Özelkan, Ertunga C. & Lim, Churlzu, 2018. "Aggregate planning with Flexibility Requirements Profile," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 45-58.
    16. Simpson, N. C., 1999. "Multiple level production planning in rolling horizon assembly environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 15-28, April.
    17. Tarim, S. Armagan & Kingsman, Brian G., 2006. "Modelling and computing (Rn, Sn) policies for inventory systems with non-stationary stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 581-599, October.
    18. Salewski, Frank, 1994. "An integrative approach to audit-staff scheduling," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 358, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    19. Clark, Alistair R., 2003. "Optimization approximations for capacity constrained material requirements planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 115-131, May.
    20. Grubbstrom, Robert W. & Tang, Ou, 2000. "Modelling rescheduling activities in a multi-period production-inventory system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 123-135, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1998_num_245_1_5017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecoru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.