IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2005_num_388_1_7168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Après le bac professionnel ou technologique : la poursuite d'études jusqu'à bac + 2 et sa rentabilité salariale en début de vie active

Author

Listed:
  • Stéphanie Moullet

Abstract

[fre] Le rendement salarial que les bacheliers professionnels et technologiques peuvent attendre de la poursuite de leurs études dépend de leur réussite, incertaine, au diplôme de niveau bac + 2. Le calcul de ce rendement est fondé sur le supplément de salaire que pourraient escompter ces bacheliers, compte tenu de leurs caractéristiques individuelles, s'ils poursuivaient leurs études en cas de réussite au niveau du diplôme bac + 2, ou sans obtenir de titre plus élevé. En tenant exclusivement compte de l'incertitude liée au risque d'échec au diplôme et au risque de chômage, les bacheliers professionnels qui poursuivent leurs études peuvent espérer après trois ans de vie active un supplément moyen de salaire de 5,6 % relativement à ceux qui arrêtent leur formation initiale au bac, de + 10,6 % pour les bacheliers technologiques. Néanmoins, pour ces derniers, les caractéristiques des deux groupes (arrêt des études ou poursuite avec succès) diffèrent, et une simulation de la poursuite d'études pour les simples bacheliers ne leur attribue qu'un gain de 3,2 % en cas de succès au diplôme de bac + 2. Le rendement simulé de la poursuite d'études diplômantes par les bacheliers sortant immédiatement après leur réussite au bac professionnel est du même ordre de grandeur que celui obtenu par ceux qui ont effectivement poursuivi et réussi au niveau bac + 2 (autour de 13 %). L'avantage retiré de la poursuite d'études tiendrait alors essentiellement à une meilleure rémunération des caractéristiques individuelles analogues à celles de ceux qui ont effectivement poursuivi et réussi au niveau bac + 2. Les bacheliers professionnels qui n'ont pas poursuivi au-delà auraient pu avoir intérêt à le faire, et ce même dans le cas d'un cursus non sanctionné par un diplôme (le rendement serait alors de 5,2 %). Ces résultats reposent néanmoins sur l'hypothèse que les informations disponibles suffisent pour caractériser l'homogénéité ou la dissemblance des populations étudiées. [ger] Zweijähriges Studium nach dem Berufs-oder Technologieabitur und dessen lohnmaBiger Vorteil zu Beginn des Erwerbslebens . . Welchen lohnmaBigen Nutzen die Absolventen eines Fachabiturs aus einen'l anschlieBenden zweijahrigen Studium ziehen, hangt vom Bestehen des Diploms ab. Die Berechnung dieses Nutzens basiert auf dem zusatzlichen Lohn, den diese Abiturienten aufgrund ihrer individuellen Merkmale erwarten konnten, wenn sie nach Bestehen dieses Diploms weiter studieren oder kein hoheres Diplom erwerben. Unter ausschlieBlicher Berücksichtigung der Unsicherheit im Hinblick auf das Nichtbestehen des Diploms oder die Arbeitslosigkeit konnen die Inhaber eines Berufsabiturs, die ihre Ausbildung fortsetzen, nach drei Jahren Erwerbstatigkeit mit einem durchschnittlichen Lohnzuwachs von 5,6% gegenüber denen, die ihre Erstausbildung mit dem Abitur abschlieBen, und die Inhaber eines Technologieabiturs von 10,6% rechnen. Bei Letzteren unterscheiden sich jedoch die Merkmale der beiden Gruppen (Beendigung der Ausbildung oder erfolgreiches Studium), sodass bei einer Simulation des Studiums die Inhaber lediglich eines Abiturs nur einen Zugewinn von 3,2% im Falle des Bestehens des Diploms nach einem zweijahrigen Studium erlangen. Der simulierte Nutzen des Erwerbs eines Studienabschlusses für die Abiturienten, die unmittelbar nach Abschluss des Berufsgymnasiums ins Erwerbsleben eintreten, ist dagegen gleich groB wie bei denjenigen, die ein zweijahriges Studium absolvierten und erfolgreich abschlossen (etwa 13%). Demnach bestünde der Vorteil eines Studiums im Wesentlichen in einer besseren Vergütung der individuellen Merkmale, die denen derjenigen entsprechen, die ein zweijahriges Studium absolvierten und erfolgreieh abschlossen. Die Inhaber eines Berufsabiturs, die danach nicht weiter studierten, hatten aber gut getan, dies zu tun, auch ohne Erwerb eines Diploms (der Nutzen lage bei 5,2%). Diese Ergebnisse basieren allerdings auf der Hypothese, dassdieverfügbarenlnformationenzurCharakterisierung der Homogenitat oder Unterschiedlichkeit der untersuchten Populationen ausreichen. [spa] Tras el bachillerato profesional o tecnológico: la continuaci6n de estudios durante dos anos y su rentabilidad salarial al iniciar la vida activa . . El rendimiento salarial que pueden alcanzar los bachilIeres profesionales y tecnolégicos como consecuencia de sus estudios depende de la obtencién, incierta, de la titulacién de nivel bachiller + 2. El calculo de dicho rendimiento se basa en el suplemento salarial con el que podrfan contar estos bachilleres, conforme a sus caracterfsticas particulares, en casa de continuar sus estudios tras la obtencién de la titulacién de nivel bachiller + 2,0 sin la obtencién dei grade mas elevado. Teniendo como (mica incertidumbre el. riesgo de no obtener la titulacién y, por ende, un empleo, los bachilIeres profesionales que continuan sus estudios pueden esperar, tras tres anos de vida activa, un promedia de 5,6 % mas en su salario que el de aquéllos que suspenden su formacién inicial de bachillerato, mas de 10,6 % para los bachilleres tecnolégicos. No obstante, para estos ultimos, las caracterfsticas de los dos grupos (suspensién de estudios 0 continuacién con éxito) difieren, siendo asf que la continuacién de los estudios sélo atribuye un incremento de 3,2 % a los simples bachilleres en casa de obtener la titulacién de nivel bachiller + 2. Por el contrario, el rendimiento proyectado de la continuacién de estudios sancionados con bachilleres egresados, después de haber obtenido inmediatamente el bachillerato profesional, es de una orden de magnitud similar a la conseguida por aquéllos que han continuado y obtenido el nivel bachiller + 2 (alrededor de 13 %). La ventaja en la continuacién de estudios conlIevarfa principalmente una mejor remuneracién de las caracteristicas individuales analogas a las de aquéllos que han continuado y obtenido el nivel bachiller + 2. Los bachilleres profesionales que no han proseguido con otros estudios hubieran podido estar interesados en hacerlo, yeso mismo en el casa de estudios universitarios en los que no se concede titulacién (el rendimiento serfa asf de 5,2 %). No obstante, dichos resultados se basan en la hipétesis de que basta con las informaciones disponibles para caracterizar la homogeneidad 0 la diferencia de las poblaciones estudiadas. [eng] After the Professional or Technological Baccalauréat: Wage Return at the Start of Working Life for Holders of a 2-Year Higher Education Diploma (Bac + 2) . . The wage return professional or technological baccalauréat holders can expect depends on whether or not they obtain a 2-year higher education diploma (Bac + 2). This return is calculated according to the wage supplement they can expect to receive (taking into account individual characteristics) if they continue their studies beyond the 2-year higher education diploma, or if no further qualification is obtained. Allowing for uncertainty, stemming from the risk of diploma failure and unemployment, after three years of working Iife professional baccalauréat holders who continue their studies can hope to obtain an average salary supplement of 5.6% compared with those who stopped their initial training at baccalauréat level, a figure that rises to 10.6% for technological baccalauréat holders. However, when the differing characteristics of these two groups (Le. those who stop studying and those who continue their studies with success) are taken into account, baccalauréat holders obtaining a 2-year higher education diploma can expect a wage supplement of just 3.2%. Studies have shown, however, that there is no difference between the wage return to professional baccalauréat holders pursuing further qualifications and the wage return to those who have actually studied for and obtained the 2-year higher education diploma (around 13%). Those who continue their studies would be rewarded with better pay in recognition of individual characteristics which are similar to those characteristics of holders of a 2-year higher education diploma. Professional baccalauréat holders who have not continued to this level would have been weil advised to have done so, since even for courses not leading to a qualification the wage return would be 5.2%. These results, however, depend upon the assumption that there is sufficient information available to characterise the similarities and differences of the populations studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Stéphanie Moullet, 2005. "Après le bac professionnel ou technologique : la poursuite d'études jusqu'à bac + 2 et sa rentabilité salariale en début de vie active," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 388(1), pages 15-36.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2005_num_388_1_7168
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2005.7168
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2005.7168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2005.7168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2005_num_388_1_7168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2005.7168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willis, Robert J & Rosen, Sherwin, 1979. "Education and Self-Selection," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(5), pages 7-36, October.
    2. Stéfan Lollivier & Pascale Pollet, 2003. "Impact de la formation initiale sur les rémunérations au cours de la vie active," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 113(6), pages 801-827.
    3. Oaxaca, Ronald, 1973. "Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 14(3), pages 693-709, October.
    4. Alan S. Blinder, 1973. "Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 8(4), pages 436-455.
    5. Dominique Goux & Éric Maurin, 1997. "Destinées sociales : le rôle de l'école et du milieu d'origine," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 306(1), pages 13-26.
    6. Patrick Puhani, 2000. "The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 53-68, February.
    7. James J. Heckman & Lance J. Lochner & Petra E. Todd, 2003. "Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions," NBER Working Papers 9732, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. White, Halbert, 1980. "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 817-838, May.
    9. Hilmer, Michael J., 2001. "A comparison of alternative specifications of the college attendance equation with an extension to two-stage selectivity-correction models," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 263-278, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arnaud Dupray & Isabelle Recotillet, 2004. "Trajectoires scolaires atypiques et conditions d'entrée sur le marché du travail : l'exemple des sortants de niveaux IV et III," Working Papers halshs-00087354, HAL.
    2. Nicolas Gury, 2011. "Dropping out of higher education in France: a micro-economic approach using survival analysis," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 51-64.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabin Langevin & David Masclet & Fabien Moizeau & Emmanuel Peterle, 2017. "Ethnic gaps in educational attainment and labor-market outcomes: evidence from France," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 84-111, January.
    2. Gabin Langevin & David Masclet & Fabien Moizeau & Emmanuel Peterle, 2017. "Ethnic gaps in educational attainment and labor-market outcomes: evidence from France," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 84-111, January.
    3. Golder, Stefan M., 2000. "Endowment or Discrimination? An Analysis of Immigrant-Native Earnings Differentials in Switzerland," Kiel Working Papers 967, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Polachek, Solomon W., 2008. "Earnings Over the Life Cycle: The Mincer Earnings Function and Its Applications," Foundations and Trends(R) in Microeconomics, now publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 165-272, April.
    5. Mark Clatworthy & Gerald Makepeace & Michael Peel, 2009. "Selection bias and the Big Four premium: New evidence using Heckman and matching models," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 139-166.
    6. Ward-Warmedinger, Melanie E., 1999. "Salary and the Gender Salary Gap in the Academic Profession," IZA Discussion Papers 64, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Kristy Eastough & Paul W. Miller, 2004. "The Gender Wage Gap in Paid‐ and Self‐Employment in Australia," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 257-276, September.
    8. P.W. Miller & S. Rummery, 1989. "Gender Wage Discrimination in Australia: A reassessment," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 89-21, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    9. Atal, Juan Pablo & Ñopo, Hugo R. & Winder, Natalia, 2009. "New Century, Old Disparities: Gender and Ethnic Wage Gaps in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 1131, Inter-American Development Bank.
    10. Leslie I. Boden & Monica Galizzi, 2003. "Income Losses of Women and Men Injured at Work," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 38(3).
    11. Blunch, Niels-Hugo & Das, Maitreyi Bordia, 2007. "Changing norms about gender inequality in education : evidence from Bangladesh," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4404, The World Bank.
    12. Moser, Christian, 2016. "How Could Wage Inequality Within and Across Enterprises be Reduced?," MPRA Paper 95381, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Pablo Lavado & Nelson Oviedo & Hernán Ruffo, 2016. "Destruction of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skills in Adulthood," Working Papers 16-07, Centro de Investigación, Universidad del Pacífico.
    14. Haoge Chang & Joel Middleton & P. M. Aronow, 2021. "Exact Bias Correction for Linear Adjustment of Randomized Controlled Trials," Papers 2110.08425, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    15. Nicola Gagliardi & Benoît Mahy & François Rycx, 2021. "Upstreamness, Wages and Gender: Equal Benefits for All?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 52-83, March.
    16. Hübler, Olaf, 2003. "Geschlechtsspezifische Lohnunterschiede (Gender-specific wage differentials)," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 36(4), pages 539-559.
    17. Niels-Hugo Blunch, 2018. "Just like a woman? New comparative evidence on the gender income gap across Eastern Europe and Central Asia," IZA Journal of Migration and Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-41, December.
    18. Sile Padraigin O'Dorchai, 2008. "Do women gain or lose from becoming mothers?," Brussels Economic Review, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 51(2/3), pages 243-268.
    19. Hugo Ñopo, 2008. "Matching as a Tool to Decompose Wage Gaps," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(2), pages 290-299, May.
    20. Christopher Bollinger & James P. Ziliak & Kenneth R. Troske, 2011. "Down from the Mountain: Skill Upgrading and Wages in Appalachia," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(4), pages 819-857.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2005_num_388_1_7168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.