IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0248107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method-oriented systematic review on the simple scale for acceptance measurement in advanced transport telematics

Author

Listed:
  • Jan C Zoellick
  • Adelheid Kuhlmey
  • Liane Schenk
  • Stefan Blüher

Abstract

Acceptance intuitively is a precondition for the adaptation and use of technology. In this systematic review, we examine academic literature on the “simple scale for acceptance measurement” provided by Van der Laan, Heino, and de Waard (1997). This measure is increasingly applied in research on mobility systems without having been thoroughly analysed. This article aims to provide such a critical analysis. We identified 437 unique references in three aggregated databases and included 128 articles (N = 6,058 participants) that empirically applied the scale in this review. The typical study focused on a mobility system using a within-subjects design in a driving simulator in Europe. Based on quality indicators of transparent study aim, group allocation procedure, variable definitions, sample characteristics, (statistical) control of confounders, reproducibility, and reporting of incomplete data and test performance, many of the 128 articles exhibited room for improvements (44% below.50; range 0 to 1). Twenty-eight studies (22%) reported reliability coefficients providing evidence that the scale and its sub-scales produce reliable results (median Cronbach’s α >.83). Missing data from the majority of studies limits this conclusion. Only 2 out of 10 factor analyses replicated the proposed two-dimensional structure questioning the use of these sub-scales. Correlation results provide evidence for convergent validity of acceptance, usefulness, and satisfying with limited confidence, since only 14 studies with a median sample size of N = 40 reported correlation coefficients. With these results, the scale might be a valuable addition for technology attitude research. Firstly, we recommend thorough testing for a better understanding of acceptance, usefulness, and satisfying. Secondly, we suggest to report scale results more transparently and rigorously to enable meta-analyses in the future. The study protocol is available at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/j782c/).

Suggested Citation

  • Jan C Zoellick & Adelheid Kuhlmey & Liane Schenk & Stefan Blüher, 2021. "Method-oriented systematic review on the simple scale for acceptance measurement in advanced transport telematics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248107
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248107
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248107&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0248107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Vlassenroot, Sven & Broekx, Steven & Mol, Johan De & Panis, Luc Int & Brijs, Tom & Wets, Geert, 2007. "Driving with intelligent speed adaptation: Final results of the Belgian ISA-trial," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 267-279, March.
    3. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    4. Comte, Samantha & Wardman, Mark & Whelan, Gerard, 2000. "Drivers' acceptance of automatic speed limiters: implications for policy and implementation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 259-267, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilgihan, Anil & Barreda, Albert & Okumus, Fevzi & Nusair, Khaldoon, 2016. "Consumer perception of knowledge-sharing in travel-related Online Social Networks," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 287-296.
    2. Aixia Li & A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam & Xiaoqing Gu, 2021. "Factors Engaging College Students in Online Learning: An Investigation of Learning Stickiness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    3. Oghuma, Apollos Patricks & Chang, Younghoon & Libaque-Saenz, Christian Fernando & Park, Myeong-Cheol & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2015. "Benefit-confirmation model for post-adoption behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: A comparative analysis of KakaoTalk and Joyn in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 658-677.
    4. Chen Wei, 2021. "The influence of Consumers’ Purchase intention on Smart Wearable Device: A study of Consumers in East China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(8), pages 46-72.
    5. Li, Chia-Ying & Fang, Yu-Hui, 2020. "I searched, I collected, I experienced: Exploring how mobile augmented reality makes the players go," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Bilal Al-Momani, 2016. "The Effect of Perceived Factors of Decision Support Systems on Actual Usage: Behavioral Intention of Using Decision Support Systems as a Mediating Variable: “An Empirical Study of Jordanian Higher Edu," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 201-201, December.
    7. Suzy Jagger & Haytham Siala & Diane Sloan, 2016. "It's All in the Game: A 3D Learning Model for Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 383-403, August.
    8. Shahla Asadi & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Abd Razak Che Husin & Elaheh Yadegaridehkordi, 2017. "Customers perspectives on adoption of cloud computing in banking sector," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 305-330, December.
    9. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi, 2019. "Chat now… Examining the variables influencing the use of online live chat," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 55-67.
    10. van der Pas, J.W.G.M. & Kessels, J. & Vlassenroot, S.H. & van Wee, B., 2014. "The pros and cons of Intelligent Speed Adaptation as a restrictive measure for serious speed offenders," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 158-174.
    11. Phillip C. James, 2021. "What Determines Student Satisfaction in an E-learning Environment? A Comprehensive Literature Review of Key Success Factors," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-1, August.
    12. Dalal Bamufleh & Amani Saud Alshamari & Asrar Saud Alsobhi & Hanan Hisham Ezzi & Waad Sultan Alruhaili, 2021. "Exploring Public Attitudes toward E-Government Health Applications Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(3), pages 1-1, August.
    13. Bong Keun Jeong & Tom E Yoon, 2013. "An Empirical Investigation on Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Banking Services," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(1), pages 31-40, March.
    14. Mohammad Hasan Galib & Khalid Ait Hammou & Jennifer Steiger, 2018. "Predicting Consumer Behavior: An Extension of Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-73, August.
    15. Federico Iannacci & Colm Fearon & Kristine Pole, 2021. "From Acceptance to Adaptive Acceptance of Social Media Policy Change: a Set-Theoretic Analysis of B2B SMEs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 663-680, June.
    16. Shahla Asadi & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Abd Razak Che Husin & Elaheh Yadegaridehkordi, 0. "Customers perspectives on adoption of cloud computing in banking sector," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-26.
    17. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Rahman, Shaikh Moksadur, 2020. "Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Business Review, Asian Business Consortium, vol. 10(2), pages 99-108.
    19. Wang Kai, 2019. "Towards a Taxonomy of Idea Generation Techniques," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 65-80, January.
    20. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0248107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.