IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The validity and reliability of the Malay version of the social support for exercise and physical environment for physical activity scales

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulwali Sabo
  • Yee Cheng Kueh
  • Wan Nor Arifin
  • YoungHo Kim
  • Garry Kuan

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine the validity of the Malay-translated version scales for assessing the social support and physical environment for exercise activities. Method: The study was a cross-sectional design in nature, using self-reported questionnaires among the university students in Malaysia. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling approach. Perceptions regarding social support and physical environment were assessed using the Malay-translated version scales. The standard forward-backwards translation was conducted to translate the English version of the scales to the Malay version. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to validate the translated version scales; composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) were computed. Results: A total of 857 students participated in this study (female: 49.1%, male: 50.9%). The mean age of the participants was 20.2 (SD = 1.6). The fit indices of the initial hypothesized measurement models (social support and physical environment) were not satisfactory. Further improvements were made by adding covariances between residuals' items within the same factor for each hypothesized model. The final re-specified measurement models demonstrated adequate factor structure for the social support scale with 24 items (CFI = .932, TLI = .920, SRMR = .054, RMSEA = .061), and the physical environment scale with five items (CFI = .994, TLI = .981, SRMR = .013, RMSEA = .054). The CR was .918 for family support, .919 for friend support, .813 for perceived availability, and .771 for perceived quality. The AVEs were .560 for family support, .547 for friend support, .554 for perceived availability, and .628 for perceived quality. The intra-class correlation (ICC) based on test-retest was .920 for family support, .984 for friend support, .895 for availability of facilities, and .774 for quality of facilities. Conclusion: The Malay version of the social support scale for exercise and the physical environment scale for physical activity were shown to have adequate psychometric properties for assessing perceived social support and physical environment among the university students in Malaysia. Perspective: This study presented the psychometric properties of the social support and physical environment scales based on CFA and was the first to translate these scales from the original English version to the Malay version.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulwali Sabo & Yee Cheng Kueh & Wan Nor Arifin & YoungHo Kim & Garry Kuan, 2020. "The validity and reliability of the Malay version of the social support for exercise and physical environment for physical activity scales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239725
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239725
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239725&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerbing, David W & Anderson, James C, 1984. "On the Meaning of Within-Factor Correlated Measurement Errors," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(1), pages 572-580, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sherry E. Moss & Meng Song & Sean T. Hannah & Zhen Wang & John J. Sumanth, 2020. "The Duty to Improve Oneself: How Duty Orientation Mediates the Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Feedback-Seeking and Feedback-Avoiding Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 615-631, September.
    2. Justina GineikienÄ—, 2013. "Consumer Nostalgia Literature Review And An Alternative Measurement Perspective," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 4(2).
    3. E. L. L. Strijbosch & G. H. P. Helm & G. J. J. M. Stams & I. B. Wissink, 2018. "Young Children (4–8 years) in Group Care: Development and Validation of a Group Climate Instrument," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(6), pages 1769-1780, December.
    4. Golossenko, Artyom & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Aroean, Lukman, 2020. "Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 737-755.
    5. Jurlin, Kresimir & Malekovic, Sanja & Puljiz, Jaksa & Cziraky, Dario & Polic, Mario, 2002. "Covariance structure analysis of regional development data: an application to municipality development assessment," ERSA conference papers ersa02p469, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Michael Hennessy & Amy Bleakley & Martin Fishbein, 2012. "Measurement Models for Reasoned Action Theory," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 640(1), pages 42-57, March.
    7. Ching Ching Fang & James J. H. Liou & Sun-Weng Huang & Ying-Chuan Wang & Hui-Hua Huang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2021. "A Hybrid, Data-Driven Causality Exploration Method for Exploring the Key Factors Affecting Mobile Payment Usage Intention," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Junwei Zheng & Guangdong Wu, 2018. "Work-Family Conflict, Perceived Organizational Support and Professional Commitment: A Mediation Mechanism for Chinese Project Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Mercy Gloria Ashepet & Liesbet Vranken & Caroline Michellier & Olivier Dewitte & Rodgers Mutyebere & Clovis Kabaseke & Ronald Twongyirwe & Violet Kanyiginya & Grace Kagoro-Rugunda & Tine Huyse & Liesb, 2024. "Assessing scale reliability in citizen science motivational research: lessons learned from two case studies in Uganda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Pereira, Arun & Hsu, Chin-Chun & Kundu, Sumit K., 2005. "Country-of-origin image: measurement and cross-national testing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 103-106, January.
    11. Gordon W. Cheung & Helena D. Cooper-Thomas & Rebecca S. Lau & Linda C. Wang, 2024. "Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 745-783, June.
    12. Shagun Tyagi & Ashulekha Gupta & Nabila Ansari, 2024. "Adoption and perception of banking customers towards green mode of banking: a demonstration of structural equation modelling," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 826-842, September.
    13. Harris, Lloyd C. & He, Hongwei, 2019. "Retail employee pilferage: A study of moral disengagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 57-68.
    14. André Pirralha & Wiebke Weber, 2020. "Correction for measurement error in invariance testing: An illustration using SQP," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Sande, Jon Bingen & Nyrud, Anders Qvale, 6. "Consumer preferences for wood surfaces – a latent variable approach," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 42, April.
    16. Rupp, Deborah E. & Cropanzano, Russell, 2002. "The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 925-946, September.
    17. Hannah, Sean T. & Avolio, Bruce J. & Walumbwa, Fred O. & Chan, Adrian, 2012. "Leader Self and Means Efficacy: A multi-component approach," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 143-161.
    18. Mütterlein, Joschka & Kunz, Reinhard E. & Baier, Daniel, 2019. "Effects of lead-usership on the acceptance of media innovations: A mobile augmented reality case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 113-124.
    19. Zhang, Yan & Han, Yu-Lan, 2019. "Paradoxical leader behavior in long-term corporate development: Antecedents and consequences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 42-54.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.